On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:57:23 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Chris Forbes wrote:
>
> > Seems a little unfortunate to add a random bool to this interface which is
> > otherwise fairly descriptive, but OK.
> >
>
> I agree that this is a bit
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Chris Forbes wrote:
> Seems a little unfortunate to add a random bool to this interface which is
> otherwise fairly descriptive, but OK.
>
I agree that this is a bit unfortunate. I was going to suggest adding a
flags parameter and a bitfield
Seems a little unfortunate to add a random bool to this interface which is
otherwise fairly descriptive, but OK.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> While my intention is that the new intrinsics should be usable by all
> drivers, we need to make them
While my intention is that the new intrinsics should be usable by all
drivers, we need to make them optional until all drivers switch.
This doesn't do anything yet, but I added it as a separate patch to
keep the interface churn separate for easier review.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke