On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
On 04/17/2013 02:31 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
[snipped]
How hard would it be to make GLSL IR an alternative IR for pipe
drivers? On the driver side, it seems I only need to add
PIPE_SHADER_IR_GLSL for the preferred IR and
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Those are just ideas. I'm open to discussion.
The driver is disabled by default and needs to be enabled via
--with-gallium-drivers=i965.
I think a warning + maybe something like
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
I think everything Marek said was correct. If you could extend Gallium
to consume
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 07:25:12AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
Those are just ideas. I'm open to discussion.
The driver is disabled by default and needs to be enabled via
--with-gallium-drivers=i965.
I think a warning + maybe something like
--with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial might
- Original Message -
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
I think everything Marek said was correct. If
On 04/17/2013 02:31 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Marek Olšákmar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chia-I Wuolva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Matt Turnermatts...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On 04/16/2013 01:58 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
If you could agree with me, then, technically, we need to make the new
driver less confusing. The driver is disabled by default, of course.
It can be enabled with --with-gallium-drivers=i965 now. Would it help
if I change it to something like
On 04/16/2013 05:09 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
I think everything Marek said was correct. If you could extend Gallium
to consume GLSL IR it might actually
Hi list,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I've been working on i965g, a new pipe driver for Intel GEN6 (and
later), for a while now. I would like to know if there is any
interest in it and if it can be merged upstream. The code is
currently
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
My only objection is over adding a driver that is explicitly a toy,
the confusion it will cause users, and the developer time it will
waste. It wasn't uncommon for
On 04/16/2013 09:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
My only objection is over adding a driver that is explicitly a toy,
the confusion it will cause users, and the
On 04/16/2013 09:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
My only objection is over adding a driver that is explicitly a toy,
the confusion it will cause users, and the
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kenneth Graunke kenn...@whitecape.org wrote:
On 04/16/2013 09:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
My only objection is over adding a
Am Dienstag, den 16.04.2013, 10:23 -0700 schrieb Matt Turner:
waste. It wasn't uncommon for a user to waste a nontrivial amount of
someone's time in #intel-gfx only to discover that they were trying to
use the (old) i965g driver that no one maintained.
I wonder, should i965g be built by
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Michael Karcher
michael.karc...@fu-berlin.de wrote:
I suspect there might be a comparable need for a i965g driver, as that
chip has no vertex shader hardware.
This isn't true.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
My only objection is over adding a driver that is explicitly a toy,
the
On 04/16/2013 10:35 AM, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.04.2013, 10:23 -0700 schrieb Matt Turner:
waste. It wasn't uncommon for a user to waste a nontrivial amount of
someone's time in #intel-gfx only to discover that they were trying to
use the (old) i965g driver that no one
Hi Ken,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Kenneth Graunke kenn...@whitecape.orgwrote:
On 04/16/2013 09:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
My only objection is over
i965 is fully programmable. It can do vertex, geometry, hull, domain, and
fragment shading in hardware. The only thing the i965 classic driver uses
software rendering for is some deprecated and rarely used GL 1.x features.
I think the original 965G and 965GM chip suffered from a balance
Those are just ideas. I'm open to discussion.
The driver is disabled by default and needs to be enabled via
--with-gallium-drivers=i965.
I think a warning + maybe something like
--with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial might work,
the thing is distros should probably be using i915g at this
- Original Message -
Those are just ideas. I'm open to discussion.
The driver is disabled by default and needs to be enabled via
--with-gallium-drivers=i965.
I think a warning + maybe something like
--with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial might work,
If not, then I'd
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
I think everything Marek said was correct. If you could extend Gallium
to consume GLSL IR it might actually be an interesting project.
Yes, it is. I
Hi list,
I've been working on i965g, a new pipe driver for Intel GEN6 (and
later), for a while now. I would like to know if there is any
interest in it and if it can be merged upstream. The code is
currently available here
https://github.com/olvaffe/mesa/tree/i965g
The project was started
If you want a piece of advice... it would be great to extend gallium
to allow the GLSL IR to be passed to drivers directly. Once that's
done, I think you can copy their shader codegen as-is with all
optimizations or even share it. Also, I don't think Intel will move to
Gallium if they can't use
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
This is interesting, personally I'm fine with getting this merged.
That said, there was a i965g driver upstream before (though it never
worked right IIRC and was probably gen4 or maybe gen5 too only due to
its age),
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
This is interesting, personally I'm fine with getting this merged.
That said, there was a i965g driver upstream before (though it never
worked right IIRC and was probably gen4 or maybe gen5 too only due to
its age),
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want a piece of advice... it would be great to extend gallium
to allow the GLSL IR to be passed to drivers directly. Once that's
done, I think you can copy their shader codegen as-is with all
optimizations
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Stéphane Marchesin
stephane.marche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
wrote:
This is interesting, personally I'm fine with getting this merged.
That said, there was a i965g driver upstream before (though
28 matches
Mail list logo
