On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 13:08, Lucas Stach wrote:
> I can reproduce the issue, but sadly there is no simple fix for this,
> as it's a bad interaction between some of the new features.
> At the core of the issue is the dmabuf-feedback support with the chain
> of events being as follows:
>
> 1.
Am Donnerstag, dem 25.04.2024 um 07:56 -0300 schrieb Joao Paulo Silva
Goncalves:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:58 AM Lucas Stach wrote:
>
> > Etnaviv added some resource tracking to fix issues with a number of
> > use-cases, which did add some CPU overhead and might cost some
> >
Hi Joao Paulo,
Am Mittwoch, dem 24.04.2024 um 19:31 -0300 schrieb Joao Paulo Silva
Goncalves:
> Hello all,
>
> We might have encountered a performance regression after upgrading from Mesa
> 2022.0.3 to 2024.0.2. During our automated hardware tests using LAVA, we
> noticed
> a lower score on
Hello all,
We might have encountered a performance regression after upgrading from Mesa
2022.0.3 to 2024.0.2. During our automated hardware tests using LAVA, we noticed
a lower score on glmark2 when we upgraded from the OpenEmbedded release from
Kirkstone to Scartgarth. After conducting some
