Re: [meta-ti] doxygen recipe duplicate in meta-ti

2021-03-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 03:08:47AM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:55:30PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am seeing this > > > > doxygen: > > meta-oe 1.8.20 > > meta-ti 1.8.9.1 > > > > And meta-ti wins because it has higher

Re: [meta-ti] uim-sysfs duplicate recipes

2021-03-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:51 AM Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 06:43, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > uim-sysfs seems to be copied into several layers as seen here > > > > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=uim-sysfs > > > > I wonder

Re: [meta-ti] uim-sysfs duplicate recipes

2021-03-18 Thread Fathi Boudra
Hi, On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 06:43, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi > > uim-sysfs seems to be copied into several layers as seen here > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=uim-sysfs > > I wonder if this should be consolidated into one common place ? > perhaps meta-oe or

Re: [meta-ti] doxygen recipe duplicate in meta-ti

2021-03-18 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:55:30PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > I am seeing this > > doxygen: > meta-oe 1.8.20 > meta-ti 1.8.9.1 > > And meta-ti wins because it has higher layer priority, which is not a good > thing > can we use the version from meta-oe and

[meta-ti] [PATCH] layer.conf: add hardknott to compatible release branches

2021-03-18 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index 2393e61a..6fb214c6 100644 --- a/conf/layer.conf +++ b/conf/layer.conf @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "meta-ti" BBFILE_PATTERN_meta-ti :=