Re: [Metamath] Metamath Christmas challenge

2024-01-01 Thread Igor Ieskov
A proof for 3cubes is ready - https://github.com/expln/metamath-theorems/blob/master/metamath-christmas-challenge-2023/metamath-christmas-challenge-2023.mm - Igor On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 4:59:54 PM UTC+1 savask wrote: > Thierry, > > > Maybe I'll have another go at implementing the

Re: [Metamath] Results about ax-13 usage

2024-01-01 Thread Mario Carneiro
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 6:43 PM Jim Kingdon wrote: > One (historical?) note: some of what we have now is the result of > experimentation in the opposite direction - trying to figure out whether a > logical system can be built without distinct variable constraints at all (I > think there is some

Re: [Metamath] Results about ax-13 usage

2024-01-01 Thread Jim Kingdon
This isn't something I'm likely to get hugely involved with myself, but it does intrigue me particularly from the point of iset.mm.  There right now we have both https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/ax-bndl.html and https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/ax-i12.html (stronger and weaker forms of what in

Re: [Metamath] Same alphabet requirements in Word theorems

2024-01-01 Thread David A. Wheeler
> On Dec 31, 2023, at 7:32 PM, Jerry James wrote: > > Greetings, > > Due to some real life events, I had to step away from metamath last year. > First, I want to apologize for ghosting the community on the last couple of > pull requests I made in 2022. I hope you can forgive me for that.

[Metamath] Results about ax-13 usage

2024-01-01 Thread Gino Giotto
In the last few days, I've been working on reducing the usage of ax-13, aiming at getting the highest result with the minimum amount of changes. The results of my findings are committed in my repository branch https://github.com/GinoGiotto/set.mm/tree/ax-13-complete, which is based on a