Hi All,
Has anybody done any work to port Freediag
(http://freediag.sourceforge.net/) to OpenBSD or to write similar
ODBII software for our favorite OS? Googling did not yield anything
useful.
For those that don't already know, ODBII is the nifty hardware
interface present in many automobiles
Rob writes:
I am looking to see if anyone is successfully using cfs on 3.7 with
the generic kernel. We can discuss this offline unless anyone
objects, as it is old and not well documented software.
Specificially, when I do the cmkdir, the command hangs after
entering the password
Is there any way to force the SSHd to accapt just e.g. 1024Bit
DSA/RSA-Keys but e.g. absolutly NO key wich is under 1024Bit?
So that I could prevent the usage of e.g. weak keys (~512Bit) via the
sshd_config?
Kind regards,
Sebastian
--
Don't buy anything from YeongYang.
Their Computercases are
Hi Sebastian,
So does a normal Via Board match the ATX-Specification so that the
PCI-Slot is still useable? I just saw some special desktop-cases as I
tried to find the answer. :-/
I have had no problems mounting Mini-ITX boards in normal ATX housings.
HTH... Nico
From: Christopher Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anybody done any work to port Freediag
(http://freediag.sourceforge.net/) to OpenBSD or to write similar
ODBII software for our favorite OS? Googling did not yield anything
useful.
-Just being curious, if some developer actually ported this to
Sebastian,
On 8/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just a little question to those who've already a VIA Epia Board.
THe MINI-ITX-Factor looks very small so I asked myself if I would be able
to include the board in anormal ATX-Case. Because I need the PCI-Slot
(Wlan-GW) I
Hi,
I've been having a problem with OpenBSD and my server
for a long time now. Transferring large amounts of data
triggers it and `sh /etc/netstart em0` will fix it temporarily.
I've been using scp mostly but the problem isn't protocol
dependant since samba transfer triggered it also. I get
hello, i have a obsd machine as a gateway to other 6 pc's using nat. one of
those pc's i use for gaming so i want to use altq for bw purposes. the
relevant part of pf is this:
internal_lan = 10.0.0.0/24 http://10.0.0.0/24
game_pc = 10.0.0.6 http://10.0.0.6
.
queue std_in bandwidth 445Kb
I've set up a soft raid 1 in a degraded configuration (waiting on the
second drive to arrive). I used MAKEDEV to create an placeholder wd5.
After compiling the raid driver and auto configure into the kernel I
tried a reboot (to properly switch the root over to the raid array)
and during a kernel
I think the manual says the last filter rule to match takes precedence,
unless it's NAT rules, then it's the first.
Also, I've found pftop as a great firewall rule debugging aid.
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: John Blaze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:16
* Hyb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 14:18]:
While I wouldn't consider my BGP knowledge as strong, it was fundamentally
the CARP interaction that I was trying to grasp
oh, that is very easy.
you tell bgpd that a neighbor session depends on an interface. all it
does is too look at that
- Original Message -
From: Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: bgpd and two CARPed routers
makes no sense at all. put one from each prvider to the active and one
from eaach to the backup core router.
I can't
I am now running 3.7. I got graphical logins via xdm working and
decided to replace xdm with kdm. I changed the call of xdm
in rc to a call to kdm and rebooted. kdm comes up and accepts
input, but I cannot log in with any id, including root. (I always get
the message 'login failed'.) Are there
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:34:54 -0500
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now running 3.7. I got graphical logins via xdm working and
decided to replace xdm with kdm. I changed the call of xdm
in rc to a call to kdm and rebooted. kdm comes up and accepts
input, but I cannot log in with
On Thursday 11 August 2005 08:42, J. Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:34:54 -0500
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now running 3.7. I got graphical logins via xdm working and
decided to replace xdm with kdm. I changed the call of xdm
in rc to a call to kdm and
Dave Feustel wrote:
I am now running 3.7. I got graphical logins via xdm working and
decided to replace xdm with kdm. I changed the call of xdm in rc
to a call to kdm and rebooted. kdm comes up and accepts input,
but I cannot log in with any id, including root. (I always get
the message
I'm playing around with a reverse proxy app called Pound that requires
threading support in OpenSSL, but apparently the version of OpenSSL in
the source tree does not enable threading by default.
Is there a reason why I shouldn't enable threading in a stand alone
version of OpenSSL? Is there a
* Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 17:11]:
Hi, yet another smart question: if I call bind() this way
struct sockaddr_in sin;
int fd;
fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
bind(fd, (struct sockaddr*) sin, sizeof(sin);
...
then do I still have to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 08:34:54AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
I am now running 3.7. I got graphical logins via xdm working and
decided to replace xdm with kdm. I changed the call of xdm
in rc to a call to kdm and rebooted. kdm comes up and accepts
input, but I cannot log in with any id,
2005/8/11, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sockaddr_in would suffice, but it is bad style. with sockaddr_storage,
you ar eon the safe side, even when you add v6 support later, or v8, or
whatever the future brings, so play safe and use sockaddr_storage,
that's what it is for.
Thanks. Yes, I
* Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 17:46]:
basically every system call can be interrupted and thus fail with EINTR
What about SA_RESTART? Can it be relied on to restart poll(), accept(),
read() and writev() when I for example use SIGHUP to reload config files?
Or should I
I am now running 3.7 with KDE 3.3.2.
All my apps seem to be running, usually even better
than in 3.6 :-).
I *have* run into a few places where 3.7 apps do not
work quite like the 3.6 apps. These are more likely KDE
problems than OpenBSD problems, but maybe
someone will know how to fix them.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
2005/8/11, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sockaddr_in would suffice, but it is bad style. with sockaddr_storage,
you ar eon the safe side, even when you add v6 support later, or v8, or
whatever the future brings, so play
On Thursday 11 August 2005 10:37, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
You might want to check out
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html
Thanks for the pointer. I remember reading it a while ago,
but I had forgotten about it since then.
I found that point 6 in that writeup doesn't work for me,
possibly
I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode
ie. if, while logged in via xdm, I enter ctl-alt-F[0-3],
I get a tty login!!!
And if, alfter logging in to one of those tty screens,
I atempt to start KDE, I am informed that I can't
because the x
I've been asked to do something a bit silly for work. Let me give you the
background.
I have a bunch of network connections that run our of a non-OpenBSD firewall,
they just happen to be VPN tunnels, for auditing purposes they want to generate
a log when somebody starts a session down one of
* Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 18:57]:
I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode
ie. if, while logged in via xdm, I enter ctl-alt-F[0-3],
I get a tty login!!!
eh, yes, of course.
And if, alfter logging in to one of those
* Hyb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 18:57]:
I just have one remaining query - with two sessions from each upstream and
CARP on the inside interface, does this make a legitimate scenario for
ifstated?
nah.
Presumably if both upstream interfaces failed on the CARP master,
but the internal
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#TimeZone
I ll do what I want from here
seems the best way to do it
On 8/11/05, Andy Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
Thanks Andy thats the same as
ln -s /usr/share/zoneinfo/GB /etc/localtime
if I am not wrong.
Yes, its the same.
I
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:51:38AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
| I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
| terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode
Hardly a surprise, of course. Please read up on ttys(5). You can not
have run OpenBSD without having logged in to a text-mode console
On Thursday 11 August 2005 11:59, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 18:57]:
I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode
ie. if, while logged in via xdm, I enter ctl-alt-F[0-3],
I get a tty login!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:52 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Major Surprise with xdm on 3.7
I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
terminals C[0-3] are running in
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:25:38 -0500
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 11:59, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 18:57]:
I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode
ie.
On Thursday 11 August 2005 13:25, you wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 11:59, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 18:57]:
I just discovered that even though xdm is running,
terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode
ie. if, while logged in via xdm, I
On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:13, Paul de Weerd wrote:
xdm is for graphical logins. text-mode console logins are handled by
getty(8). You can not make xdm handle text-mode logins, that's not
what it's designed to do.
I understand that.
It is beginning to look like I have had for at least 2
On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:41, Paul de Weerd wrote:
The fact that you can not run multiple X servers on one videocard, as
it currently stands.
I did not think a separate server was required for each terminal window.
That may be one of my conceptual problems about how X Windows works.
You
I never tried it in OpenBSD, but usually when I already have logged in
graphically I can go to a console, type X :1 -query localhost and get
another xdm login screen.
Wijnand
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:49:13PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
| On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:13, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| xdm is for graphical logins. text-mode console logins are handled by
| getty(8). You can not make xdm handle text-mode logins, that's not
| what it's designed to do.
|
| I
Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides that, if you log in on a text console, use startx(1) to launch
X, lock your X session when you leave your computer (of course) then
anyone can switch to the text console where you started X, suspend
(^Z) or stop (^C or ^\) that and access your
Thanks for the advice, Paul. I'll try to follow it.
On Thursday 11 August 2005 13:04, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:49:13PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
| On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:13, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| xdm is for graphical logins. text-mode console logins are handled
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Dave Feustel wrote:
What I dn't yet quite grasp is why there cannot be multiple independent
instances of kde running, each one attached to a different virtual terminal
(C0-C3) on the same computer. Then I could be logged on as two different
users simultaneously,
From: Dave Feustel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I dn't yet quite grasp is why there cannot be multiple
independent
instances of kde running, each one attached to a different
virtual terminal
(C0-C3) on the same computer. Then I could be logged on as
two different
users simultaneously,
I think there are people doing what you're describing. Try Googling on
xdm+ttys or xdm+lock.down and you'll see some tips for FreeBSD, Linux,
etc. One of these might work for you.
I once got into xdm the way you describe and had a devil of a time
getting back out. That was the first and last
On Thursday 11 August 2005 13:54, Mats O Jansson wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Dave Feustel wrote:
What I dn't yet quite grasp is why there cannot be multiple independent
instances of kde running, each one attached to a different virtual terminal
(C0-C3) on the same computer. Then I
On Thursday 11 August 2005 01:41 pm, Paul de Weerd wrote:
The fact that you can not run multiple X servers on one videocard, as
it currently stands.
You really should read up on ttys(5) and the X Windows.
That isn't entirely true, on my Linux desktop I have gdm starting 2 virtual
consoles
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Wijnand Wiersma
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:05 PM
To: misc
Subject: Re: Major Surprise with xdm on 3.7
I never tried it in OpenBSD, but usually when I already have logged in
graphically I can
Dave Feustel wrote:
Keep in mind that xdm does not at all do what I thought it did.
If using xdm does not permit simultaeneous multiple instances of KDE
on my computer, then I see no advantage to using xdm.
From a message by Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Dave Feustel wrote:
Keep in mind that xdm does not at all do what I thought it did.
If using xdm does not permit simultaeneous multiple instances of KDE
on my computer, then I see no advantage to using xdm.
How about having the graphics system up when the
On Thursday 11 August 2005 15:23, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Dave Feustel wrote:
Keep in mind that xdm does not at all do what I thought it did.
If using xdm does not permit simultaeneous multiple instances of KDE
on my computer, then I see no advantage to using xdm.
From a message by
Does anybody have experience getting Thin Clients to work with OBSD?
I was considering HP ones, but are too expensive. Any other suggestions?
BTW,
if i have a dual head Video Board, two mice, two keyboards, would it
be possible to configure X to allow two users working on the same box,
i.e., two X login screens, and of course, those login screens totally
independent?
Thanks for your advice.
What I want to do is make it possible for multiple users simultaneously
to login and run kde on C0-C3. Is that possible?
I think you might want to take a look at Xnest. While it won't allow
you to to switch with function keys, it would allow you to have more
than one user logged in to a
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
if i have a dual head Video Board, two mice, two keyboards, would it
be possible to configure X to allow two users working on the same box,
i.e., two X login screens, and of course, those login screens totally
independent?
theoretically, yes.
--
And
Are there ideas to change tcpdump or different
networking tools that it can be started with the
new group names instead of the ifnames.
tcpdump -evtni lan_if
instead of
tcpdump -evtni sis0
thanks
regards
Karl-Heinz
On Thursday 11 August 2005 15:42, Joseph C. Bender wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Dave Feustel wrote:
Keep in mind that xdm does not at all do what I thought it did.
If using xdm does not permit simultaeneous multiple instances of KDE
on my computer, then I see no advantage to using xdm.
I
i4ve two firewalls running with 3.7 release and when i turn on the both
firewalls i can see a lot of garbage on the pf states (binary characters on
IP place).
the connections (from internal machines) become unstable (some connections
just hang).
Sometimes i get some kernel panics when the
I have a number of these: IBM 8363 N2200 -- anyone got OBSD to run on
such a thing? There are only WinCE and Linux firmware versions for it.
Tried hacking the Linux one to load a bsd kernel to no avail. Only
had an hour to spare at the time though.
.d.d.
Gustavo Rios wrote:
Does anybody
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 15:56 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
I have heard that OpenGL stuff doesn't like this, so while you can get
multiple desktops on different virtual consoles, you won't have an
equal experience on them.
I was under the impression OpenBSD didn't support OpenGL anyway, or
On Thursday 11 August 2005 16:16, Bryan Irvine wrote:
What I want to do is make it possible for multiple users simultaneously
to login and run kde on C0-C3. Is that possible?
I think you might want to take a look at Xnest. While it won't allow
you to to switch with function keys, it would
Hi Folks,
Which of the X install sets do I need if I just want to run x clients?
Clearly I don't need xserver but what about xfonts?
Russell
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Antti Harri wrote:
for a long time now. Transferring large amounts of data
triggers it and `sh /etc/netstart em0` will fix it temporarily.
UPDATE: the watchdog feature in 3.8-beta seems to reset the
card succesfully. Can anyone explain what causes the nic to
go in this
I now think that there is a security advantage to using xdm to bring up
KDE - namely, that there is no unprotected console session which can be
hijacked by someone sitting down at the computer, finding the session
from which KDE was started, and putting startkde in the background.
Well,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:04:49PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Does anybody have experience getting Thin Clients to work with OBSD?
I was considering HP ones, but are too expensive. Any other suggestions?
I have OBSD running on Neoware Thin Clients (BS-EON6300T-4SM). The
dmesg from my firewall
I just out up a pair of 3.7 machines as redundant firewall/gateway machines
to serve a small subnet at work.
Presently the carp'd outside interface is the target of a static route. We
have, on occasion in the past, had this route get lost. It has been
suggested that one way to avoid this
Hello guys,
I want to integrate the snort with pf.
I already receive the packets in snort with the pf header.
Now I want to create a rule in pf and kill the connection if
the snort say the packet is an attack.
I thought to kill the connection with the option -k of the pfctl.
But, I don't know
Hack In The Box is pleased to inform you that *HACK IN
THE BOX SECURITY CONFERENCE* is back for the 5th time
in our series! After our first ever security
conference in the Middle East we cordially invite you
to sign up for the biggest conference in our series
yet! *HITBSecConf2005 - Malaysia* will
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:02:35PM -0300, Luiz Ot?vio Souza wrote:
Probably my problem is hardware (two cheap realteks for sync), but why the
pfsync accept this malformed address, and why the kernel panic on flush ?
(i can also get panic from a pf -F state).
i can send more info if someone
Hi Arnaud,
$ ulimit -m 708879
sh: ulimit: exceeds allowable limit
is there a way to exceed the allowable limit? how is the maximum
determined?
The maximum limit is determined by your login class and how it is
configured in /etc/login.conf.
look at login.conf(5) for starters.
68 matches
Mail list logo
