On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:30:07 -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
1) set time properly, using rdate or ntpd -s.
Done
2) now how does it do?
Drifting off:
Dec 13 12:49:00 cip ntpd[26647]: ntp engine ready
Dec 13 12:49:22 cip ntpd[26647]: peer 172.16.0.4 now valid
Dec 13 12:50:16 cip ntpd[22805]:
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:24:02 -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
try disabling softdep to see if it changes things.
(I dunno if anybody still sees this; but finally I tried the same machine
as in the parallel thread
(Interesting ! - Just for the discussion, here are those on the ML350;
running bsd: ...)
Hi all,
I'd like to know if there is a way to deeply test a POSIX operating
system, and especially OpenBSD. The goal is to estimate the platform
stability (performance estimation is not required). Tests should
covert POSIX syscalls, OpenBSD specifics (drivers, etc...). For
example, I have at
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:30:07 -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
1) set time properly, using rdate or ntpd -s.
Done
2) now how does it do?
Drifting off:
Dec 13 12:49:00 cip ntpd[26647]: ntp engine ready
Dec 13 12:49:22 cip ntpd[26647]: peer
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:12:25PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
That was a totally different problem, which has been
fixed correctly in -current, check CVS.
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:ports
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005/11/26 14:17:54
Modified files:
El mar, 13-12-2005 a las 11:11 +0100, Markus Wernig escribis:
Juan J. Martmnez wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems with mod_gzip package and OpenBSD 3.8 (i386).
Just to go sure: You might want to double-check that php's own zlib
output compression isn't interfering (output_handler and
El mar, 13-12-2005 a las 08:22 -0200, Ricardo Lucas escribis:
Hi all,
does anyone knows a script or even a little program that remove all files
and subdirectories and his respective files from a folder?
I've read the man of rm and rmdir but seems like they can't do that.
rm -r directoy/
This
rm -rf directory
Re-read the rm(1) manual, and be sure you know what you're doing
before you do it.
Cheers,
Andreas
On 13/12/05, Ricardo Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
does anyone knows a script or even a little program that remove all files
and subdirectories and his respective
Thank's man, I don't know how I didn't see that in the man, I'll see it
again.
2005/12/13, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rm -rf directory
Re-read the rm(1) manual, and be sure you know what you're doing
before you do it.
Cheers,
Andreas
On 13/12/05, Ricardo Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off course!!! Now I've got. May be because I've read the man too quickly and
than I've missed this part.
Thank's to help a noob =]
2005/12/13, Ricardo Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank's man, I don't know how I didn't see that in the man, I'll see it
again.
2005/12/13, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL
rm -rf * should do it or you couuld try
find . -exec rm {} \;
Rus
--
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : t: 01635 281120 | google: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Admin work from #40/hour or $70/hour
http://www.a2b2.com - UK and US Dedicated and Virtual servers
http://www.instantblog.net - Does exactly what it says
Hi all!
I have a system (obsd3.8/sparc64) with 2 identical scsi drives (4
partitions + 1 swap each). The largest partition (10G) is mirrored over
the 2 drives as a ccd with interleave factor 16.
When running iostat during an I/O stress test (writing many small files
to the ccd in 10 parallel
Any hints...
Is it realistic to attempt this?
I intend to tar up the current /usr, then
untar in in where I'd like my new /usr partition to be, then
hand edit the fstab
Or am I all wet?? Can this work? Suggestions? Have I forgotten something. I
could do this with Linux -- but that's
Hello!
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:28:37AM -0600, Julesg wrote:
Any hints...
Is it realistic to attempt this?
I intend to tar up the current /usr, then
untar in in where I'd like my new /usr partition to be, then
hand edit the fstab
If you want to move the contents of a whole partition
I know that my questions are a little noobs, but I didn't understand, I have
to edit the files Makefile and patch-configure ?!
2005/12/13, q# [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:12:25PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
That was a totally different problem, which has been
fixed
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Rus Foster wrote:
rm -rf * should do it or you couuld try
Be careful what directory you are in when doing this because this will
remove ALL files and directories in the current directory not just a
specific file or directory.
--
Terry
That I know. if I try rm -rf * on / I'll remove all of my files.
I know I know.
Thank's for your care.
2005/12/13, Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Rus Foster wrote:
rm -rf * should do it or you couuld try
Be careful what directory you are in when doing this because this will
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:28:37AM -0600, Julesg wrote:
Any hints...
Is it realistic to attempt this?
I intend to tar up the current /usr, then
untar in in where I'd like my new /usr partition to be, then
hand edit the fstab
Or am I all wet?? Can this work? Suggestions? Have I
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:04:12AM -0200, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
I know that my questions are a little noobs, but I didn't understand, I have
to edit the files Makefile and patch-configure ?!
You can take `patches/patch-configure' from -current and then edit
Makefile and bump pkgname and then
That was I got:
cvs [update aborted]: no such directory `/patches'
=/
2005/12/13, q# [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:04:12AM -0200, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
I know that my questions are a little noobs, but I didn't understand,
I have
to edit the files Makefile and
That was I got:
cvs [update aborted]: no such directory `/patches'
=/
2005/12/13, Ricardo Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That was I got:
cvs [update aborted]: no such directory `/patches'
=/
2005/12/13, q# [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:04:12AM -0200, Ricardo Lucas
Thank's for the hint, now that's what I did:
# cd /usr/ports/net/ettercap/
:/cvs up -r1.14'patches/patch-configure'
The authenticity of host 'anoncvs.nyc.openbsd.org (64.90.179.99)' can't be
estab
lished.
RSA key fingerprint is 05:ac:be:be:f8:f6:ab:63:5e:80:6c:be:d3:31:41:cd.
Are you sure you
I've just gone through 10 days worth of mails to misc@ and have a
small request for people posting here.
Can people continuing threads on this list please keep the original
subject lines.
This makes following threads so much easier, especially when using
archives, or modern email
Just wanted people to know that OpenBSD 3.8/amd64 runs fine on a Sun
v40z, 4 x Opteron 848 2,2 GHz CPUs.
The box has 8GB of RAM, but OpenBSD can only see/use 4GB. On-board
snip
Why is this I whipped google for a while, but couldn't find an answer to my
question:
Is the maximum size of
Sam Hart schrieb:
I've just gone through 10 days worth of mails to misc@ and have a small
request for people posting here.
Can people continuing threads on this list please keep the original
subject lines.
This makes following threads so much easier, especially when using
archives, or
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:35:16PM +, Sam Hart wrote:
I've just gone through 10 days worth of mails to misc@ and have a
small request for people posting here.
Can people continuing threads on this list please keep the original
subject lines.
Please only do so if it makes sense.
On 13 Dec 2005, at 15:52, Simon Dassow wrote:
Please only do so if it makes sense.
fair enough, if the actual subject changes it makes sense
Modern email clients provide a threaded message view
this is what I was referring to
S a m
On 13 Dec 2005, at 15:48, Timo Schoeler wrote:
usually (modern) MUAs use the Mail-Followup-To: for this
that maybe, but not everyone uses modern MUAs, and online mail
archives do not seem to
S a m
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:35 AM, I wrote:
I've just gone through 10 days worth of mails to misc@ and have a
small request for people posting here.
Can people continuing threads on this list please keep the original
subject lines.
This makes following threads so much easier, especially when
Hello!
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:57:02PM +, Sam Hart wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 15:52, Simon Dassow wrote:
Please only do so if it makes sense.
fair enough, if the actual subject changes it makes sense
Modern email clients provide a threaded message view
this is what I was referring to
On 13/12/05, Sam Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to have put a few peoples noses of of joint
Not me, I couldn't agree more.
Reading the lists using most web archives is a pain in the arse thanks
to people using broken mail clients, changing the subject field and/or
not properly referencing
On 12/13/05, Bruno Carnazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know if there is a way to deeply test a POSIX operating
system, and especially OpenBSD. The goal is to estimate the platform
stability (performance estimation is not required). Tests should
covert POSIX syscalls, OpenBSD
Markus Wernig skrev:
I have a system (obsd3.8/sparc64) with 2 identical scsi drives (4
partitions + 1 swap each). The largest partition (10G) is mirrored over
the 2 drives as a ccd with interleave factor 16.
And 1.2M/s is rather less that what I'd have expected, is this figure
really the
I have a 3.5 firewall acting as a gateway for 2 networks (DMZ and
internal lan) to a single internet provider. To alleviate bandwidth
issues, I purchased a second internet connection from a different
provider. I would like to route the DMZ through the first provider
and the internal lan to the
Hi Realtors,
You must get my FR~EE Report titled, How to Make
the Seller Call YOU First for the Listing Appointment.
Yes, it's freee and it's IMPORTANT for you as an agent
to realize the reality of the business. Once you read
this life-changing report, you'll realize that the most
important
I am more inclined to think that I made a mistake or am missing
something. This has continued to baffle me so I thought I'd post to
the list.
This machine has been up for about a week now, and with pf enabled, I
figured I should be seeing pf record some statistics by now,
perticularily for
http://www.linbsd.org/ethereal_on_openbsd38.html
I made a couple of changes from the old one.
Removed the need for the patch and updated variable information.
Essentially the process is easier than it was before as no patch is
needed. There are also the proper versions of automake/conf in ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 9 Will H. Backman contributed the following:
If you want to do it properly, use fdisk -e wd1, disklabel -E wd1, and
newfs /dev/rwd1a, in that order.
Joachim
Which is the short version of the New Disk FAQ:
Correios
Sinceras desculpas caro amigo(a),
Viemos atravis deste e-mail, informar-lhe que consta um pacote em vosso
nome em nosso depssito de mercadorias cujo por problemas diversos e ati
mesmo por incompetjncia de alguns funcionarios da nossa empresa nco
puderam ser entregues. Muitos problemas
Obviously not. DOH!
Many thanks!
On 13/12/05Mikolaj Kucharski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:45:17AM -0700, Whyzzi wrote:
set skip on { lo $ext_if }
^^^
Are you sure this is correct?
--
best regards
q#
--
I know too much and yet not enough
I ran into a very similar (maybe same) problem here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=113236417207016w=2
I have not found a solution to my problem yet unfortunately. One
thing I noticed is that my an0 card worked just find in 3.7 and 3.8
broke it, you might want to verify if that is
El mar, 13-12-2005 a las 10:22 +0100, Srebrenko Sehic escribis:
zlib API was changed between 3.6 and 3.7 which potentially broke all
external packages depending on zlib.
Ah, after reading mod_gzip doc there's one thing I missed... mod_gzip
doesn't use zlib at all.
Snip from mod_gzip doc:
...
Ever since the GNU diffutils were removed from OpenBSD there hasn't
been an sdiff. So I wrote one and placed it into the public domain.
It can be found at http://cyth.net/~ray/sdiff/.
This sdiff supports all of GNU sdiff's options and is compatible
with OpenBSD's diff. All feedback is welcome.
Works fine on i386.
On Sunday 11 December 2005 14:37, Todd T. Fries wrote:
New X snaps with a 'dlopen X server' diff are heading out to the mirrors
today and tomorrow as they get built.
I have put this into snapshots to get wide testing before Matthieu
commits this diff. When you test,
On 14/12/05, Jolan Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:33:39PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
yes. amd64, Radeon 9200 SE.
yes. amd64, geforce2 mx 400.
If anybody wants to contribute info to the bug report I've filed, it
can be found at
On 14/12/05, Simon Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anybody wants to contribute info to the bug report I've filed, it
can be found at http://bugzilla.mplayerhq.hu/show_bug.cgi?id=417
Sorry, wrong list.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:14:06PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Drifting off:
Dec 13 12:49:00 cip ntpd[26647]: ntp engine ready
Dec 13 12:49:22 cip ntpd[26647]: peer 172.16.0.4 now valid
Dec 13 12:50:16 cip ntpd[22805]: adjusting local clock by 39.362721s
[...]
Dec 13 13:02:33 cip ntpd[22805]:
Hello.
i have 1 rule in my pf.conf, with wich i want to allow locally generated
traffic ONLY to 10.0.0.1 and port 22:
block out on $int_if proto {tcp,udp} from $int_ip to ! 10.0.0.1 \
port != 22
this rule allow to connect to only 10.0.0.1, BUT to any port instead
only 22.
Am i doing
48 matches
Mail list logo
