On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:32PM +0100, Michael Frost wrote:
Using OpenBSD-v3.8 and v3.9-BETA on i386 together with tor, privoxy
stops working alfways after a few minutes up to a few hours. 'Stop
working' means either the privoxy process isn't running anymore (so it
needs to be restarted) or
bw_test_512MB:ETA: 1:08 101.21/512.00 MB6.03 MB/s
I increased the value to 10
thanks
/bkw
On 18/02/06, Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
I'm running obsd 3.8 release on my gateway. Two xl nics are installed.
The GW does NAT
i have EXACTLY the same issue on one of Samsung's notebook.
you need to UNPLUG power cord from your PC/notebook BEFORE
booting into OpenBSD/NetBSD.
see here http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2004/03/25/0005.html
Bryan Brake wrote:
This annoyance started when I bought a brand-new Dell
Hello list,
I'm playing with IPv6 in 3.8 and came up to this strange problem.
My IPv6 connectivity is given by a broker (xs26.net) and I have set up a gif
interface to use it (gif0):
/etc/hostname.gif0 contains:
tunnel SIS0IPv4 BROKERIPv4
inet6 IPv6PREFIX::1
!route add -inet6 default
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Olivier Mehani wrote:
Hello list,
I'm playing with IPv6 in 3.8 and came up to this strange problem.
My IPv6 connectivity is given by a broker (xs26.net) and I have set up a gif
interface to use it (gif0):
/etc/hostname.gif0 contains:
tunnel
By the way, when I now have a proper download speed, I have to ask why
the default vaule of net.inet.tcp.recvspace is set so low?
I have a 100MBit inet connection so it was little confusing with my
earlier bandwidth limitation.
/bkw
On 18/02/06, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm certain someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but the current
setting is optimized for low latency networks, like LANs, and reduces
kernel memory consumption. Also, your use of a value of a million, is
overly high and might lead to problems--experiment and use the lowest
value that meets your
Hello,
I have a box with 512MB of RAM, which is running a snapshot from 2006-02-13.
The box does not get used much, so most of the RAM stays still, i.e.
not used by the userland.
I am now quite surprised why OpenBSD does not use all of this RAM for
disc cache etc.
After rebooting the system,
I have two 3.8 (GENERIC) IPSec VPN gateways using ISAKMP transforms for
negotiation. No complicated PF rules, everything is wide open between
networks. I can access and negotiate every protocol except when I call
an nslookup request from one side to a W2K3 server on the other. I
receive timeouts
David Higgs wrote:
After reading the man pages for pf.conf and ftp-proxy, it's not 100%
clear to me how I should go about supporting ftp. I have a basic
2-nic obsd box doing nat for my internal network, and run ftp-proxy
with the -n flag. The relevant portions of my pf.conf are shown
below:
Hi
Do I checkout source via anoncvs as root or as user?
Erwin
--
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie
pix isn't so easy as openbsd :-|
rdr from outside:
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 INTERNALPC 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp EXTERNALIP smtp INTERNALPC smtp netmask
255.255.255.255
Thomas
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 13:13 -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
On Saturday, February 18,
For the archives:
Tried again with sysctl machdep.apmhalt=1, same game :-/
# halt -p
/etc/rc.shutdown in progress...
/etc/rc.shutdown complete.
syncing disks... done
Attempting to power down...
apm0: APM set power state: unrecognized device ID (9)
uvm_fault(0xd6930298, 0x8000, 0, 1) - e
kernel:
I'm beginning to wonder if I'm being dense and missing something
brutally simple. I've looked at the pf FAQ, payed special attention
to the FTP section, and even used identical configuration without
success.
The problem is that with passive mode, the client is actively
attempting to connect to
On 2006/02/18 16:12, David Higgs wrote:
The problem is that with passive mode, the client is actively
attempting to connect to the server. Port numbers on either end
cannot be predicted
Well, that depends somewhat on your ftp server. Most modern ones allow
you to restrict the range of ports
On 2006-02-18 16:12:39 -0500, David Higgs wrote:
Any further ideas?
Check the example. It uses ftp-proxy(8)
Best
Martin
PS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
Hey all,
I have having trouble getting my Atheros based WG311T Netgear wireless
card to work. I have ruled out bad signal strength thus far, and the
driver seems to be working.
Dmesg (STABLE-branch GENERIC 3.8):
ath0 at pci3 dev 7 function 0 Atheros AR5212 rev 0x01: irq 10
ath0: AR5212 7.9
On 2/18/06, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get the Java plugin for my browsers (Opera and Firefox),
and from what I can tell from the documentation, this is done by
installing the jdk package. The documentation I read said that only
the 1.3 and 1.4 version have plugins for
At the risk of sounding like I'm a regular on this list, RTFM. OR
look at other examples in the PIX config.
On 2/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there. I am a long time user of openbsd and ipf/pf. I just got stuck
with the task of managing some pix firewalls for the
Re!
Keyboard does not work in Feb 15 snapshot too.
Actually it work on my laptop, but not on my desktop.
On desktop I'm having the same error:
KbdOn: tcsetattr: Operation not supported
Complete X.log:
(--) checkDevMem: using aperture driver /dev/xf86
(--) Using wscons driver in pcvt
I am needing to build two identical failover firewalls
with openbsd, pf, pfsync, and carp. So far simple enough,
with so many articles and examples available. All of these
are using NAT.
However, I am needing to use public IP's out of a /25
allocation, without NAT. I have not been able to find
Maybe someone else has mentioned this already on the list, I happened to
go to Sera Systems site today while looking for some 1U OpenBSD boxes, and
I found this:
---
After many pleasurable years, we have decided to
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:09:21 -0500 (EST), Matthew Closson wrote:
Maybe someone else has mentioned this already on the list, I happened to
go to Sera Systems site today while looking for some 1U OpenBSD boxes, and
I found this:
I'm trying to get the Java plugin for my browsers (Opera and Firefox),
and from what I can tell from the documentation, this is done by
installing the jdk package. The documentation I read said that only
the 1.3 and 1.4 version have plugins for browsers, so I chose 1.4.
Doing a make after
24 matches
Mail list logo