El mar, 21-02-2006 a las 22:02 -0500, Melameth, Daniel D. escribis:
Is ANYONE doing hostap with 802.11g? If so, is it working well? And
doing WEP? If not, any thoughts on doing this with -current?
Thoughts appreciated--I'd love a make, model and relevant dmesg of
anyone doing hostap with
5212 will not work, i've spend hours on hours
only 5213 will work. I've talked to Reyk ... and it is strange.
Thomas
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 07:22 +0100, Johan Torin wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, b h wrote:
Hi
I have a (slightly older, but still snazzy) generic
acting as my
no, only 11b with atheros. there is no implementation for 11g in
openbsd.
Thomas
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:02 -0500, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Is ANYONE doing hostap with 802.11g? If so, is it working well? And
doing WEP? If not, any thoughts on doing this with -current?
Thoughts
Hi,
I got a firewall server on OpenBSD 3.8/amd64, running on a
dual Intel EMT64, I hope this is right.
The machine is setup with ddb.panic=0 on the
/etc/sysctl.conf, but last night it got a page fault in supervisor
mode, I didn't have physical access to it, so this message
was read to
vnvianna wrote:
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC.MP) #504: Sat Sep 10 16:02:38 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 1073086464 (1047936K)
avail mem = 908865536 (887564K)
using 22937 buffers containing 107515904 bytes (104996K) of memory
El mii, 22-02-2006 a las 09:55 +0100, Thomas Bvrnert escribis:
no, only 11b with atheros. there is no implementation for 11g in
openbsd.
Thomas
Uhm, sorry. I missed that point: hostap mode with 802.11b (vs INTERSIL
PRISM based cards). Indeed the card I said is a 802.11g.
regards,
Juanjo
On 21/02/06, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've built it before from that site so am guessing it has grown out of
date or become neglected.
Do you really need ksh93? pdksh should work just fine in 99.9% of your
cases.
No, in fact I can't
I just compiled python2.4 which recommended for Zope 2.9.0. There a
small glitch in configure. You'll get an error like below. Its late
so just all reference to define_xopen_source starting around 1488.
this has to do with select. But the configure file is not set up to
handle
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:21:38AM -0800, Tony Sterrett wrote:
I just compiled python2.4 which recommended for Zope 2.9.0. There a
small glitch in configure. You'll get an error like below. Its late
so just all reference to define_xopen_source starting around 1488.
this has to do with
For those interested, here are the preliminary results of my Sun x2100
tests. More hardware tests results available at
http://www.armorlogic.com/oscl/
Issues with Sun X2100 running OpenBSD/amd64 (-current from 22/02/2006)
1) possible bsd.mp issues due to misconfigured apic's
ioapic0 at mainbus0
I run amd64 on emt64t all the time. Works fine.
I have not profiled it though.
On Feb 22, 2006, at 12:12 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
vnvianna wrote:
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC.MP) #504: Sat Sep 10 16:02:38 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem =
--- Johan Torin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, b h wrote:
Hi
I have a (slightly older, but still snazzy)
generic
acting as my gateway - see dmesg at bottom
my laptop internal wired NIC was acting funny, so
I
thought I'd try wireless to network
At the moment the CPU usage on this machine is low, i will try as soon as i can
get physical access to
reinstall openbsd, migrate to the i386 arch on it, and see if it is more
stable, i don't think the higher
interrupts on the nics is a problem, since it's almost idle.
By the pf stats I'm about
I think this was because you had two spamd-setups running.
spamd will only service once configuration connection at
a time.
-Bob
* knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-21 13:55]:
On 2/21/06, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is spamd running on this system?
Hello.
What are the thin-client options with OpenBSD ?
Something similar to www.ltsp.org
If anyone is using openbsd as a thin-client server. i would be
interested in hearing their experiences.
Regards
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 08:19, you wrote:
Hello.
What are the thin-client options with OpenBSD ?
Something similar to www.ltsp.org
If anyone is using openbsd as a thin-client server. i would be
interested in hearing their experiences.
I've actually used OpenBSD as an LTSP server. The
I was looking through the man pages on the OBSD site, and I can't seem
to find a page giving the status of polling (whether its supported or
not) on any of the network drivers.
Where could I find this information?
On 2/22/06, A Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking through the man pages on the OBSD site, and I can't seem
to find a page giving the status of polling (whether its supported or
not) on any of the network drivers.
it's not supported.
* andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-17 23:57]:
I have a Cisco router I am trying to replace. I will describe the Cisco
box, the replacement OpenBSD router, the setup and finally what issues I
am having. The bgpd.conf contents are at the bottom of the email. If
there is some additional
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stuart,
Thanks for your reply. Yes i was looking on DELL servers too, but here
is one BUT :) DELL server i must buy from shop, but other servers i can
get from starage, difference in prices is about 15-20% :) But i will
look for separate PERC RAID controller :)
deskless client environment with obsd works very well. But there are
some pitfalls if you don't use generic PC's as 'clients'.
I've had problems with compaq evo. They don't support A20 option at
(pxe)boot and that makes the kerenel initialization frezee.
Later on I tried with WYSE clients that
Thanks Alexey :)
Maybe you have expirience with this controller? I'm interested in
performance of this model :)
Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stuart,
Thanks for your reply. Yes i was looking on DELL servers too, but here
is one BUT :) DELL server i must buy from
I am trying to setup a simple vpn between two networks using ipsecctl.
One side is running 3.8 release, the other 3.8 stable. On both sides I
have copied over /etc/isakmpd/private/local.pub to /etc/isakmpd/pubkeys/
ipv4/remote.ip.add.ress and run isakmpd -K and then ipsecctl -f /etc/
ipsec.conf.
Can you show me the output of ipsecctl -nvf ... on both machines.
HJ.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:08:39PM -0500, Adam wrote:
I am trying to setup a simple vpn between two networks using ipsecctl.
One side is running 3.8 release, the other 3.8 stable. On both sides I
have copied over
on the modem side, do you have to set-up NAT in order to be able to access your
OBSD from the Internet?
I think the Alcatel modem does have NAT - or not?
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:24:31PM +0100, Daim Willemse wrote:
The configuration of the OBSD box is not that hard:
I use
On 2/22/06, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this was because you had two spamd-setups running.
spamd will only service once configuration connection at
a time.
-Bob
well I run spamd-setup only daily, and of course I assume that at any
particular point in
That's very suspicious.. sounds like a bug, but I'm
not sure how to chase it with you. please contact me off list
should it happen again.
* knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-22 11:54]:
On 2/22/06, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this was because you had two
vnvianna wrote:
BTW, do you think the 3.9 is at some stable stage so that i can use it with
this fw, i got redundancy (thanks
carp/pfsync), maybe i will give it a try.
I have been using 3.9 in production for a few weeks now without any
issue what so ever and the servers are really busy as
Just a note to the OpenBSD community:
I have been helping a friend clean up after a security incident with a
PHP web app that hadn't been patched on a Linux server. I run the same
app on OpenBSD, and I worry a lot less. I still patch my PHP apps
because it would be stupid to assume that OpenBSD
I'm in the same boat.
Actually, I don't really need an internal ADSL modem per se,
primarily I just need a managed ADSL device from which I can
automatically obtain line quality and carrier loss information via
SNMP or a serial port or some other OpenBSD-compatible mechanism.
I had one of the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:11:26PM -0500, Will H. Backman wrote:
| Just a note to the OpenBSD community:
| I have been helping a friend clean up after a security incident with a
| PHP web app that hadn't been patched on a Linux server. I run the same
| app on OpenBSD, and I worry a lot less. I
At 02:17 PM 22/02/2006, Kevin wrote:
Are there any plans to import ueaglectl to OpenBSD?
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/
Do these work with most North American Telcos ?
---Mike
Kevin wrote:
I'm in the same boat.
Actually, I don't really need an internal ADSL modem per se,
primarily I just need a managed ADSL device from which I can
automatically obtain line quality and carrier loss information via
SNMP or a serial port or some other OpenBSD-compatible mechanism.
I had
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the mail server. I
would also like to add those hosts automatically to a table in order to
block their access altogether so that the infected PC's cannot attempt
other
Chris Smith wrote:
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the mail server. I
would also like to add those hosts automatically to a table in order to
block their access altogether so that the infected PC's
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:47:02PM -0500, Chris Smith wrote:
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the mail server. I
would also like to add those hosts automatically to a table in order to
block their
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:31:41PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Chris Smith wrote:
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the mail server. I
would also like to add those hosts automatically to a table in
Ray Lai wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:31:41PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Chris Smith wrote:
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the mail server. I
would also like to add those hosts automatically to a
On 2006/02/22 14:47, Chris Smith wrote:
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the mail server. I
would also like to add those hosts automatically to a table in order to
block their access altogether so that
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:17:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Ray Lai wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:31:41PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Chris Smith wrote:
In addition to preventing infected PC's from using their own SMTP engine
to send out spam by blocking port 25 from all but the
Ray Lai wrote:
I thought you meant you could do something like:
block in log-table zombie to port 25
where zombie is updated automatically.
If you read on the PF and look at what I send you, you will see that
bad-ssh IS updated automatically.
That's what the line:
Ray Lai wrote:
I thought you meant you could do something like:
block in log-table zombie to port 25
where zombie is updated automatically.
Read this section and you will get a few good idea on log to table and
then use the same table to block the traffic you don't want:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:48:19PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Ray Lai wrote:
I thought you meant you could do something like:
block in log-table zombie to port 25
where zombie is updated automatically.
If you read on the PF and look at what I send you, you will see that
bad-ssh
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
For those interested, here are the preliminary results of my Sun x2100
tests. More hardware tests results available at
http://www.armorlogic.com/oscl/
Issues with Sun X2100 running OpenBSD/amd64 (-current from 22/02/2006)
1)
Thanks!
Any particular reason, other than that OBSD focuses on correctness and
security rather than speed?
Or is there a security problem with polling?
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 2/22/06, A Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking through the man pages on the OBSD site, and I can't
seem to
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:50:39PM -0800, A Rossi wrote:
Thanks!
Any particular reason, other than that OBSD focuses on correctness and
security rather than speed?
Or is there a security problem with polling?
Polling is not better than normal interrupt driven networking. It often
results
==
ITEX 2006 - www.itexshow.com
Las Vegas Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV -- March 14-17, 2006
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options in
PF. This box will pretty much just be handling the natting with a bare
On 2/23/06, Steve D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options in
PF. This box will pretty much just be
Steve D. wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options in
PF. This box will pretty much just be handling the natting
html
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1252
meta name=Generator content=Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)
titleBeste Roker,/title
style
!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
Nick Holland wrote:
Steve D. wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to
know if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime
options in PF. This box will pretty much just be
I'm adapting a samba config for a domain server from FreeBSD to OpenBSD,
but part of it doesn't appear to be able to work in OpenBSD
The part that needs to be adapted:
add user script = /usr/sbin/pw useradd -n %u -m
#%u is a SMB variable (its the user being added) -m makes a home
#directory
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:39:36PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
Steve D. wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options
I think think this is a question for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Bako [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first though was that it denoted a patch level,
It denotes a patchlevel for the OpenBSD package/port.
but in this particular case the file sizes are close enough
that there cannot be that much of a
Hi Guys
Can anyone confirm if the Intel SRCS16 controller is compatible with
OpenBSD, It seems from the freebsd amr (4) man page that this is a
MegaRAID controller.
Sevan
56 matches
Mail list logo
