I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant amount of money!
That's it.
On 10/7/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/10/07 19:29, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I am evaluating processor hardware for using with openbsd. Two options
of course: Intel and AMD.
There are more
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
What strike me, among many things wrong and unreal here is the specific
part as well:
Marvell is not in a position to open their wireless firmware as it is
currently dependent on the third party operating system kernel that they
do not own. A GPL
Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant amount of money!
That's it.
Then go for AMD, they have more instructions then Intel that now try to
catch up to them!
So, call it more instructions machine per dollar if you like that!
Hi!
I've applied the patches from the errata page, and now I'm trying to
recompile the kernel.
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf $ config GENERIC
Don't forget to run make depend
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf $ cd ../compile/GENERIC
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC $ make clean depend
Makefile,
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:11:53AM +0200, Andreas Maus wrote:
Hi.
I recently replaced my ATI X800 with a new NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GS.
Checking the nv(4) man page and it states that it supports:
[... snipp ...]
GeForce 7XXX
[... snipp ...]
snip
I have the same problem with a GeForce
On 08/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
While playing around with pf I've gotten used to passing the '-o' flag
to pfctl to optimize my rulesets when loading them.
However, I've noticed that /etc/rc does not pass the '-o' flag when
loading the ruleset with pfctl during boot.
Now, with colors :
#!/bin/sh
TOP_COLOR=greenyellow
BOTTOM_COLOR=firebrick
echo digraph pkg_dep
echo {
for PKG in $(pkg_info | cut -d' ' -f1) ; do
PKG_INFO=$(pkg_info -c $PKG | tail -n+4 | tr -s '\n')
echo \t\$PKG\ [label=\$PKG\\\n$PKG_INFO\];
REQ_BY=
for REQ_BY in
On 08/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/10/07 18:08, Brian wrote:
There are more options than just those. macppc and sparc64 are amongst
the faster arch's too (and if you don't need out-and-out speed there are
more to choose from). Motherboard chipsets also make a
On 07/10/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is asymmetric
What bandwidth have you configured the shaper for ?
Some technologies like PPPoA or PPPoE over DSL will give you
an overhead of 165% for empty ACKs, meaning that your shaper
wont kick in since it doesn't consider the line
On 08/10/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/10/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is asymmetric
What bandwidth have you configured the shaper for ?
Doh !
altq on $extif cbq bandwidth 500Kb queue { def, msn, www, https, smtp,
ssh, ftp }
What kind of link
Theo de Raadt wrote on Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 02:55:22PM -0600:
Adriaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See Jim Gettys defense at
http://www.gettysfamily.org/wordpress/?p=27
[...]
You can't say anything bad about the children, can you?
Just as your rhetorical question suggests, indeed you can.
I still
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:22:35PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
So those children will get laptops before their families
have electricity? Had they any choice, how many of them
would choose that way? Given the effort and money used
for the OLPC project - on what would those people like
to
Now, with colored nodes, colored dependencies, and options handling :
#!/bin/sh
PROGNAME=$(basename $0)
NODE_COLOR=0
DEP_COLOR=0
TOP_COL=greenyellow
BOTTOM_COL=firebrick
DEP_COL=lightgrey
TOP_PKGS=
get_fulldepends() {
FULLDEP=
STEP=$(pkg_info -f $1 | grep '@depend' | cut -d':'
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant amount of money!
That's it.
Hmmm, before I answer that question I'd like to know what are the intended
uses? For example, for a DNS server I would seriously consider some of
the platforms recently
On 10/8/06, z0mbix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are supposed to use the -o option to optimise your ruleset, then
correct the ruleset in /etc/pf.conf so there should be no need to load
the ruleset with -o everytime.
Ok, thanks, my bad. I originally thought the intent of the flag was to
permit
Note there is a problem when graphing application dependencies (-D
option) . Graphviz can not draw nodes that are shared in multiples
subgraph (ie : shared library used by multiple application).
So, this functionnality only works for simple installations.
Explanation :
Hi all
With the help of my ISP I'm trying to get native IPv6 over ADSL (PPPoE).
This isn't a regular offer and I'm the first customer who tries it out.
My ISP has set me the following two RADIUS attributes:
Framed-IPv6-Prefix = 2001:x:3000::1
Framed-IPv6-Route = 2001:x:4000::/48 2001:x:3000::1
screwed up...
Just to add some numbers, and because it's a neat tool (even if the
'export to Excel' button is evil [1]):
http://jschipper.dynalias.net/~joachim/posts/20061008/hdr_report.html
The source should be rather obvious. This page is on my home server,
which is turned off when I feel like
Hello misc
I'm trying to setup IPSec between my OpenBSD wireless access point and
a Linux client using setkey. I have managed to get IPSec working fine
between the other OpenBSD servers on my network using ipsecctl, almost
seemed too easy.
Below are my ipsec.conf from the OpenBSD box and the
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Bader wrote:
Hi all
With the help of my ISP I'm trying to get native IPv6 over ADSL (PPPoE).
This isn't a regular offer and I'm the first customer who tries it out.
My ISP has set me the following two RADIUS attributes:
Framed-IPv6-Prefix
I am new to setting up VPN's. Is the following possible using OpenBSD
pf for firewalling. The internal network is made up of Windows servers
and workstations, and the external laptop/workstation is running
Windows as well as having Cisco VPN client software. Would this
external machine running
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
[.. a part that you didn't want to make a 'point' about anyway..]
Men,
I must be pretty darn stupid I have to say.
My point wasn't about the dam licenses or comparing GPL to BSD for
crying at loud!
Then don't mention it. Also learn how to reply to
I don't see anything wrong here, perhaps tired eyes.
If you run PPPoE and the DSL line then is ATM AAL5 with LLC/SNAP
encapsulation
altq isn't going to be very effective in cases where you have lots of ACKs
going up stream.
When altq sees an ACK it calculates 40 bytes, but that ACK is 106 bytes
While working with the trunk and vlan features of OpenBSD, I ran into
one thing that I do not understand. In order to use a trunk device for
multiple vlan's, the trunk device must have an ip address assigned.
Let me illustrate my configuration (vlan ids do not match, but it's not
relavent, see
I am trying to make [OpenBSD] smaller by deleting unuseful files. I read man
and then deside whether I need it or not. After deleting a dozen of files I
received diffirent errors during startup.
Don't do that then.
I want to install it to 128mb CF.
Unless you really WANT to find yourself
* ropers wrote:
I am trying to make [OpenBSD] smaller by deleting unuseful files. I read
man
and then deside whether I need it or not. After deleting a dozen of files I
received diffirent errors during startup.
OpenBSD, with samba cups and everything to make a nice embedded server can
be
Also, you could do the following:
1) Limit the scope of the PCI certification by placing all CC storing or
processing systems on a DMZ behind an appropriately configured firewall;
AND
2) make sure that your FTP server is outside of this DMZ.
This assumes that the FTP server does not contain
On 2006/10/08 15:31, Axton Grams wrote:
While working with the trunk and vlan features of OpenBSD, I ran into
one thing that I do not understand. In order to use a trunk device for
multiple vlan's, the trunk device must have an ip address assigned.
Your ifconfig output is from when it's
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/08 15:31, Axton Grams wrote:
While working with the trunk and vlan features of OpenBSD, I ran into
one thing that I do not understand. In order to use a trunk device for
multiple vlan's, the trunk device must have an ip address assigned.
Your ifconfig
I plugged in my attache' USB drive in today, and it worked.
scsibus2 at umass1: 2 targets
sd4 at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0: PNY, Attache 2.0, 4.70 SCSI0 0/direct removable
sd4: 117MB, 117 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 239872 sec total
Thanks for fixing this issue. I had posted about it not
On 2006/10/08 17:41, Thomas Bader wrote:
I tried to reach fe80::ff1c:1402
link-local needs the network interface to be specified; you would need
fe80::ff1c:1402%tun0 here.
- According to the manual page the Framed-IPv6-Prefix can be used
in commands through the IPV6PREFIX variable.
that's
why are older versions of openbsd (or linux or whatever os) kept around?
is it because some of the older versions may work better with older
machines? for instance, i recall that our 486 and p120 did really well
with slackware 8. we're going to get some 486s going again - should i
use an older
Two ideas come to mind: Either use one interface for each VLAN, or
create VLAN interfaces on each ethernet interface and then trunk all the
VLAN interfaces assigned to the same VLAN.
Dustin Lundquist
Axton Grams wrote:
While working with the trunk and vlan features of OpenBSD, I ran into
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:39:58PM -0700, prad wrote:
why are older versions of openbsd (or linux or whatever os) kept around?
is it because some of the older versions may work better with older
machines? for instance, i recall that our 486 and p120 did really well
with slackware 8. we're
I would use them for a X server. It will serve about 128 X clients.
On 10/8/06, Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant amount of money!
That's it.
Hmmm, before I answer that question I'd like to
prad wrote:
why are older versions of openbsd (or linux or whatever os) kept around?
Not sure what you are referring to..I'm guessing you are referring to
things you saw on some FTP servers and for sale on the website...
If so, the answer is, much the same reason libraries don't throw away
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:36:47 -0400
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep your system current. There are lots of reasons to do that, few
good reasons not to.
nick you have answered my questions totally! even those i had difficulty
in figuring out how to ask (and therefore didn't).
i
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:53:42AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
Is there any plan to add a variable in /etc/rc.conf to achieve this,
or is using '-o' during boot considered a bad thing?
The plan is to make it possible to specify the optimization level
directly in the pf.conf file (which one
38 matches
Mail list logo
