On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 07:39:35PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 11/7/06, Jason McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just before i replied to this, someone else posted that setting up
wireless is non-trivial for a beginner. how can we make it clearer? i
plug in my card; ral(4) shows up in
Hi,
I am trying to setup a wild card trapit for all emails getting to some
domains I have to obviously reduce spam, but I don't see a way to do so.
Yes you can do:
spamdb -T -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And that works well, but I would like to do something like
spamdb -T -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
The idea is to switch to OpenBSD for our BGP
D/PF. In the future we will get Gigabit connections so I am concerned
about performance!
The idea is to have 2 carped boxes voor OpenBGPD and Packetfilter.
Then behind that 2 carped boxes for IPSEC Packetfilter (future)
I am assuming
Hi misc@
I've just seen a news article that says Sun is going to GPL the standard
and mobile editions:
http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml;?articleId=193600331
Would this change mean that the JDK could be distributed as a binary
package for supported platforms?
2006/11/8, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just seen a news article that says Sun is going to GPL the standard
and mobile editions:
I'll believe it when I can download the archive from Sun.
Best
Martin
Hi all,
We are having problems with a couple of machines in which we have openbsd 3.9
and 4.0 running. We are currently trying to figure out what is causing our
problems and for that reason I have set up a serial console in one of the
computers connected to another one from which I can connect
Bonjour,
Suite ` la riservation de votre nom de domaine en .FR,
Je me permets de vous faire parvenir ce mail pour que dun simple clic
vous puissiez virifier la disponibiliti en .COM .EU, avec et sans tiret
et protiger votre adresse Internet.
Dans lattente dun prochain contact,
Veuillez
Jon Simola wrote:
On 11/7/06, Price, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying our first upgrade to 4.0 and fsck during the upgrade
process seems to freeze the machine.
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors
a: 47185884963 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I would like to trapit everything that is not from these 5 emails.
Beware that people make mistakes. Someone could just make a
typing error in one of these 5 addresses and you end up blocking
a legitimate mail server..
H.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Hans Kremers wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I would like to trapit everything that is not from these 5
emails.
Beware that people make mistakes. Someone could just make a
typing error in one of these 5 addresses and you end up blocking
a
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0100, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2006/11/8, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just seen a news article that says Sun is going to GPL the standard
and mobile editions:
I'll believe it when I can download the archive from Sun.
I know what you mean.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:50:46AM +1100, nuffnough wrote:
I have an OpenBSD 3.9 box and I've been asked to configure it to terminate a
VPN using AES-256 encryption with SHA authentication, DH Group 5 (rather
than the default group 2) and a lifetime of one day. I configured my
isakmpd.conf
Hi,
could it be that named ignores the listen-on directive?
All IPs are on bge0 and 10.12.13.170 on bge1
/var/named/etc/named.conf
[...]
listen-on {
localhost;
80.237.156.59;
};
//listen-on-v6 { any; };
[...]
# lsof -ni -P
[...]
named
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 22:20, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:10, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I'm having the same issue with 4.0 -stable--well, a bastardized copy
of -stable that also contains ral, cardbus and related changes from
Sorry, forgot to add dmesg:
# dmesg
OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #1190: Tue Oct 31 17:04:30 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.81 GHz
cpu0:
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 17:35 +1300, Josh wrote:
Can anyone help out here please?
IIRC, a high amount of interrupts from a NIC during a transfer seems to
imply a poor NIC...
Now, I've never seen this kind of behavior out of an Intel NIC -- they
tend to be of at least decent quality -- this is
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:21:59AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Does anybody know if OpenVPN will also benefit form hardware encryption?
Since it does link against libssl (OpenSSL), which should use hardware
encryption when available, I'd say it should.
joachim
Hi List,
If anyone has interest in Trio3-G PCMCIA card
(its the one distributed by YahooBB) on i386 -current
it says:
pccom3 at pcmcia0 function 0: Can't allocate i/o space.
Hans Kremers wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I would like to trapit everything that is not from these 5 emails.
Beware that people make mistakes. Someone could just make a
typing error in one of these 5 addresses and you end up blocking
a legitimate mail server..
Yes and so what.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:44:19PM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
(since reyk explained this in a mail off-list, I'm going to do
it here, for the archives. The context is the Option Globetrotter
3G/HSDPA card)
wild guess; maybe the drivers for it are not included in the default
kernel, so you may
Try the cd on a few more cd readers to make sure it isn't a specific
one that has problems. If that's done with no luck, then drop the
sender of the packages a email and describe your problem.
/bkw
On 06/11/06, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list members,
i have just received my
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, mickey wrote:
SNIP
woman you are fast (:
there is supposedly a piece sold in .eu (see landisk.html)
but then nobody knows for sure... it's a japanese sex toy.
cu
--
and once again I'm fast on the draw, I see a landisk
Greg Mortensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a VIA PadlockACE equipped SBC:
16 bytes64 bytes 256 bytes1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128-cbc 31885.24k 118568.67k 312349.58k 535048.83k 649099.91k
From a irrelevant as processors become faster i386:
Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:01:39AM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
don't do dhclient ral0, do a dhclient trunk0 after setting up trunk.
# ifconfig fxp0 up
# ifconfig ral0 nwid himmet_wlan up
# ifconfig trunk0 trunkproto failover trunkport fxp0 trunkport ral0 up
#
Hello.
I inherited an old '586 computer with built-in graphics (no video card)
and a no-name 17 color monitor. I have no documentation for either. I
am trying to set it up using xorgconfig.
Is there a utility within OpenBSD 4.0 RELEASE i386 that will
interrogate the hardware to determine:
1)
Hi Misc-folks,
The quake3 dedicated server (q3ded) fails occasionally on OpenBSD 3.9. It
relies on Linux emulation, and I am using redhat_base-8.0p8 for this. I'm
using linuxq3apoint-1.32b.x86.run.
I'm getting Received signal 11, exiting..., which seems to be a recurring
thread for quake3.
Good day all,
I have read all available documentation, but can not seem to find the
solution to my problem. If anyone has any advice, or can point me
towards a good resource, it would be appreciated. I am sorry if the
answer is obvious and I have missed it.
Where I work we have a small network
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with the Abiword package in 4.0. It seems to work
fine except for the dictionary issue I am posting about.
Essentially, with Check Spelling As You Type enabled, the following
error appears after the first word is typed:
Could not load the dictionary for the
Default User wrote:
Hello.
I inherited an old '586 computer with built-in graphics (no video card)
and a no-name 17 color monitor. I have no documentation for either. I
am trying to set it up using xorgconfig.
Probably the hard way. See the new FAQ 11
On Nov 8, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
That being said, many newer monitors will feed that info back to X.org
via DPMS, and X.org will then use it to configure itself...usually
incorrectly. :) (that's not entirely fair...sometimes, X gets it
right.
In my experience, however, it is
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:08:14PM -0500, Michael Hernandez wrote:
When I got home... I looked... and low and behold... X was running
just fine, and there was no xorg.conf to be found.
Is that expected behavior? Of course not...
Actually, that IS the expected behaviour from X now. It
Hi Michael,
On 09/11/2006, at 2:08 PM, Michael Hernandez wrote:
Is that expected behavior? Of course not... and for the record, no
it doesn't work with the
same automagic goodness on the evo at work (I think it's the card
in the evo, the monitor
is exactly the same as the one I have at
Looking for thoughts on improving performance, throughput, etc. I'm
leaning towards just throwing up 2 better boxes with 2GB of ram and
P4's. Wish I could show the pf.conf rules but that's out of the
question.
Here's the stats:
-bash-2.05b# pfctl -s info -v
Status: Enabled for 14 days
Michael Hernandez wrote:
...
Is that expected behavior? Of course not... and for the record, no it
doesn't work with the same automagic goodness on the evo at work (I
think it's the card in the evo, the monitor is exactly the same as
the one I have at home) but if you haven't tried to just
Michael Lockhart wrote:
Looking for thoughts on improving performance, throughput, etc. I'm
leaning towards just throwing up 2 better boxes with 2GB of ram and
P4's. Wish I could show the pf.conf rules but that's out of the
question.
My first advise would be to upgrade to 4.0 from your 3.5
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:46:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, but only huge benefit.
with the not wildcard stuff, it seems like that would perhaps be
a bit heavier to implement than the definately is matching.
grep vs. egrep, only for
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:07:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
...
/var/named/etc/named.conf
[...]
listen-on {
localhost;
80.237.156.59;
};
//listen-on-v6 { any; };
[...]
did you make sure that /etc/hosts isn't the reason for what
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:44:46PM -0500, Michael Lockhart wrote:
Looking for thoughts on improving performance, throughput, etc. I'm
leaning towards just throwing up 2 better boxes with 2GB of ram and
P4's. Wish I could show the pf.conf rules but that's out of the
question.
if sanitizing
jared r r spiegel schrieb:
did you make sure that /etc/hosts isn't the reason for what
you're seeing? re: 'localhost'.
# cat /etc/hosts
# $OpenBSD: hosts,v 1.11 2002/09/26 23:35:51 krw Exp $
#
# Host Database
#
# RFC 1918 specifies that these networks are internal.
# 10.0.0.0
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Michael wrote:
Hi,
could it be that named ignores the listen-on directive?
All IPs are on bge0 and 10.12.13.170 on bge1
/var/named/etc/named.conf
[...]
listen-on {
localhost;
80.237.156.59;
};
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:46:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, but only huge benefit.
with the not wildcard stuff, it seems like that would perhaps be
a bit heavier to implement than the definately is matching.
Yes
Otto Moerbeek schrieb:
This is not a bug, see the named ref guide. localhost is a symbolic
name for:
localhost Matches the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses of all network interfaces on
the system.
Changing localhost to 127.0.0.1 did the trick, but just partly...
IPv6 still is still being used...
#
Hi list..
My rule set still not working, as i'm expected to
limit outgoing and incoming traffic pass to my pf
machine act as an bridge .
altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue
{int_out,dflt_out}
queue int_out bandwidth 3Mb
queue dflt_out bandwidth 16Kb cbq (default)
altq on xl2
43 matches
Mail list logo
