On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Sean Darby wrote:
1. Would it be possible to address the issue of new port tree in some more
detail after system upgrade in the FAQ?
I suppose it would be, but you're the first to ask this. (Somewhat
surprisingly.)
I have followed the steps provided
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:09:33AM +1000, Leon yendor wrote:
There does not seem to be much mention of the combination in man pages
etc in 4.1.
Is it really just like IPsec over IPv4 or ?
On a user-interface level, yes. (On a protocol level, not exactly - IPv6
has built-in support for IPsec
Joachim and Nick,
Thanks for the advice. I was just think about how to minimize the impact for
production boxes based on previous release (4.0, 4.1...).
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joachim Schipper
Sent: Monday, August
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 08:30:19PM -0700, Allie Daneman spake forth:
Ok...first off I apologize for wasting bandwidth this morning looking for
help...blame it on Sunday morning laziness. After googling and trying things
I got my qemu working w/XP
On Thu, Aug 23 2007 at 58:21, James Lepthien wrote:
Hi again,
Hi,
just for your information and if anybody runs into the same problem. I
found outr that there are a lot of sysctl values for IPSec which can be
changed so that it is possible for me to not use the default timeout of
86400.
Hi lads,
Having a wee bit of bother decrypting a dump before a restore following
a 4.0 - 4.1 migration on i386. Different box, same hardware apart from
a bigger disk.
I've decrypted and restored successfully before and not had any probs,
but was on the same 4.0 box. Could host keys be the
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:48:06PM +0200, alwin wrote:
i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
server in openbsd does not support ipv6 so i tought i will use pf to nat
the ipv6 address to the ipv4 address for port 80. but pf for some reason
does not support this.
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:48:06PM +0200, alwin wrote:
i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
server in openbsd does not support ipv6 so i tought i will use pf to nat
the ipv6 address to the ipv4 address for port 80. but pf for some reason
does not support
Hi there,
I'm wondering is there a way to scale DNS service
using OpenBSD's CARP and loadbalancing/pool features
of pf ? How about hoststated(8) ? (as I know
hoststated(8) doesn't support UDP right now)
Here is the lab setup I tried but ran into problems:
1) setup two OpenBSD 4.1 servers with
Le dimanche 26 aoC;t 2007 C 22:10 +0200, Joachim Schipper a C)crit :
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 06:39:13PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:38:47PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
Le samedi 25 aoC;t 2007 C 22:41 +0200, Joachim Schipper a C)crit :
I just got a laptop
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:03:40 -0700 (PDT), reje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering is there a way to scale DNS service
using OpenBSD's CARP and loadbalancing/pool features
of pf ? How about hoststated(8) ? (as I know
hoststated(8) doesn't support UDP right now)
Is it really
reje wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering is there a way to scale DNS service
using OpenBSD's CARP and loadbalancing/pool features
Don't ever load balance DNS in anyway.
Read the DNS BIND book.
--
Craig Skinner [EMAIL
Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone had any doubt that our insistance on freedom was important,
just read this.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2007/08/24/0027.html
What is even more astounding is the incestious love-in these other
groups have, with their
Kevin Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Darrin,
Thanks for reply.
The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to stabilize our 4.0 based
rest of the kernel uses it to store the value of curlwp. Sam won't
recompile the HAL for us (fair enough), and we can't modify the HAL
to use another register because doing so could put us in breach of
the license (v. crappy). So, do a save/set/restore on %s7 in KernIntr()
How hard is it to
reje wrote:
Please take a look at this Cisco document regarding
Scaling DNS services and CSM:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns377/c649/cdccont_0900aecd800eb95d.pdf
It a while since I had such a good laugh.
The cisco doc above requires more than one device, but as
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:32:20PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:48:06PM +0200, alwin wrote:
i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
Brian.
hmm yes, the ipv6 address wont fit in the ipv4 space, the other way
around would work but it will
Yes, we have that much DNS requests hiting our servers
(we are not experiencing any DoS but from legitimate
user requests :-)
Furthermore, the DNS infrastructure tiemouts are
unacceptable in our scenario. Registering additinal NS
records is also unacceptable.
FYI: our primary DNS experiences
rest of the kernel uses it to store the value of curlwp. Sam won't
recompile the HAL for us (fair enough), and we can't modify the HAL
to use another register because doing so could put us in breach of
the license (v. crappy). So, do a save/set/restore on %s7 in KernIntr()
How hard is
Hello,
is anyone could confirm to me that this sound card is supported by
OpenBSD (4.1) ?
I couldn't see it in this page http://openbsd.com/i386.html
But, this sound card could use same driver than other soundblaster cards ?
Thanks for the information ! :-)
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Letellier,
Please take a look at this Cisco document regarding
Scaling DNS services and CSM:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns377/c649/cdccont_0900aecd800eb95d.pdf
p.s.- long ago read DNS BIND but this book assumes
tolerance to DNS timeouts and availability of more
than two DNS IP
148 units for sale in Fort Smith, Arkansas
Brad James
CRRC
One West Mountain Suite 102
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 739-4480
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To be removed send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
subject line
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which
reje wrote:
Yes, we have that much DNS requests hiting our servers
(we are not experiencing any DoS but from legitimate
user requests :-)
Furthermore, the DNS infrastructure tiemouts are
unacceptable in our scenario. Registering additinal NS
records is also unacceptable.
FYI: our primary DNS
Hello,
I'm on an OpenBSD 4.0 machine only intermitently connected to the Internet.
I needed to get the Java port working on it. Is there any way to get
the dependent files downloaded only while I have a connection, to be
compiled later.
Best,
~Mayuresh
alwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway, thanks for the good suggestions, i will have a look at apache2
(since i'm running svn too, this might be a good idea), or else i will
simply drop ipv6 for the http
Alternatively, use a different server program. bozohttpd, lighttpd,
and thttpd are in the
Hi
I came across the following situation: there's network where several
employees have access to a client of theirs using Cisco VPN clients.
To centralize and ease administration I want to put in place an OpenBSD
box that will create a single VPN.
The client is so bearucratic that by the time
On 8/27/07, Paolo Supino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I came across the following situation: there's network where several
employees have access to a client of theirs using Cisco VPN clients.
To centralize and ease administration I want to put in place an OpenBSD
box that will create a
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:53:14PM +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello,
is anyone could confirm to me that this sound card is supported by
OpenBSD (4.1) ?
I couldn't see it in this page http://openbsd.com/i386.html
But, this sound card could use same driver than other soundblaster cards
Artur,
Thanks,
Upgrade code based on release of obsd is easy, but it would a big job to
maintain early released of products based on previous version of obsd. For
example, we would maintain 8 version of products from 3.3 to 4.0 if codes
are upgraded every half years.
Kevin
you would need
I don't think it's off topic but others might. I'm writing this post to
remember Chuck Yerkes, a long time contributor to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
http://www.sage.org/about/yerkes.html
Chuck died 3 years ago this past weekend while riding his motorcycle.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:36:06PM +0200, alwin wrote:
the faithd daemon als looks quit cool, although it maps the other way
around, it will be usefull when you have an ipv6 only network.
When faithd receives TCPv6 traffic, faithd will relay the TCPv6 traffic
to TCPv4.
Hmm, sounds
On 8/27/07, Kevin Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Artur,
Thanks,
Upgrade code based on release of obsd is easy, but it would a big job to
maintain early released of products based on previous version of obsd. For
example, we would maintain 8 version of products from 3.3 to 4.0 if codes
are
Thanks for reminding us, Diana. Chuck died 20 days after my first
motorcycle lesson; I had been meaning to send him an email telling
him I was learning to ride.
Here's one more pint glass being raised in Chuck's memory tonight.
-Kit
At 1:08 PM -0600 8/27/07, ACP wrote:
I don't think it's
Thank you to all for the excellent input. I'm now officially upgraded.
It feels good, nice and... fresh! I've started reading/learning about
CVS. Again, thank you all!
Sean
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Sean Darby wrote:
1. Would it be possible to
Kevin Cheng wrote:
Upgrade code based on release of obsd is easy, but it would a big job to
maintain early released of products based on previous version of obsd. For
example, we would maintain 8 version of products from 3.3 to 4.0 if codes
are upgraded every half years.
Why? If you do an
http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/open_chips_wiki_open
http://wikis.sun.com/display/FOSSdocs/Home
--
Joco Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://www.openbsd-pa.org
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper, faster to
setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience with Open.) Both
OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's yourself that makes the difference
here.
Oh, and you have much more
Marc Balmer wrote:
We run an OpenLDAP installation on OpenBSD that is fully synchronized on
two servers (one master, one slave) for the public schools here. ~15'000
accounts and all important systems (email, fileserver, even the ~80
firewalls, login, etc.) pull their data from it.
Can you
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper,
faster to setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience
with Open.) Both OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's
yourself that makes the difference
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
tried to take a bit of a side adventure and get HP-UX going on a PA-RISC
machine and it's no walk in the park. for cost, support, compatibility
and simplicity reasons i've abandoned the project and decided to use
other OSes instead.
How was your adventure?? Can
On Aug 27, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper,
faster to setup, and easier to maintain (because of your
experience with Open.) Both OpenBSD and HP-UX can do
J.C. Roberts wrote:
The reasoning for HP-UX is brand name recognition, vendor support, and
of course job security -when something goes wrong, your boss can blame
the brand name vendor in hopes of saving his own ass.
And this is, i think, the main point for my boss and his not
understanding
On Monday 27 August 2007, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
J.C. Roberts wrote:
The reasoning for HP-UX is brand name recognition, vendor support,
and of course job security -when something goes wrong, your boss
can blame the brand name vendor in hopes of saving his own ass.
And this is, i
Greetings all...
We bought a SK-9S22 (pci-x) card a while ago, and even though 'man msk'
listed it as working on 4.0, it actually didn't work.
So, now we are thinking about a SK-9E22 (pci-e) for another box, and we
think we should ask if this model is working on 4.1 before actually
spending any
On 8/27/07, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper, faster to
setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience with Open.) Both
OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rest of the kernel uses it to store the value of curlwp. Sam won't
recompile the HAL for us (fair enough), and we can't modify the HAL
to use another register because doing so could put us in breach of
the license (v. crappy). So, do a
On 8/27/07, JoC#o Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/open_chips_wiki_open
http://wikis.sun.com/display/FOSSdocs/Home
--
Joco Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://www.openbsd-pa.org
e-mail: [EMAIL
47 matches
Mail list logo
