On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero
of=/rsd0
was humming along quite nicely when I left this evening.
You may want to go back and fix both
Hello,
we have prepared czech site about OpenBSD and we are ready to start(email
system up,ftp system up,translate is done,only FAQ 4 and up is in
progress),but we still don't know if we can use html code from original
site or make own.It's about 14 days,when we were ask for the first time
well i think you could insert your dual NIC openbsd host into the
switch 'ring' physically, then bridging between the 2 NICs and firing
up STP, but be aware that every time you up/down an interface or
reboot your openbsd box, you'll trigger an STP recalc - which is
around 45sec outage
Good evening all,
Forgive me if this is common knowledge, but my reading of bgpd.conf(5)
on OpenBSD 4.3 did not make the following clear to me:
When running BGP with only IPv4 prefixes, the examples given in the
sample bgpd.conf work splendidly.
Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf
Pete Vickers wrote:
well i think you could insert your dual NIC openbsd host into the switch
'ring' physically, then bridging between the 2 NICs and firing up STP,
but be aware that every time you up/down an interface or reboot your
openbsd box, you'll trigger an STP recalc - which is around
Hi all,
sorry for the noise.Now I know,that Theo is somewhere out.But still one
thing.I was thought abou translation on oficial page,but there is no
answer for about month on my offer (from Saad Kadhi)?
On Wed, wrote:
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
we have prepared czech site
On 2008-09-24, tico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that simply
adding
allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48
would allow the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announcing to me be
added from the RIB into the FIB, however this was not the
# FLAVOR=ldap make install
test -z /usr/local/bin || mkdir -p --
/usr/ports/www/squid/w-squid-2.7.STABLE3-ldap/fake-i386-ldap/usr/local/bin
install -c -s -o root -g bin -m 555 'squidclient'
'/usr/ports/www/squid/w-squid-2.7.STABLE3-ldap/fake-i386-ldap/usr/local/bin/s
quidclient'
test -z
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:16:24 +0200 (CEST), Ernst Terhardt wrote
Hello,
Hi. bugs@ is probably the wrong mailing list to use for informal problem
discussions and diagnostics -- misc@ is a better choice for this discussion,
so I am routing my response there.
installed obsd-4.3 from iso image.
Hi,
I tried to compile a simple program written in C with -fno-stack-protector
option and i have some troubles...
this is my simple file main.c:
int main()
{
int i;
short int *screen = (short int *) 0xB8000;
char msg[]=Hello World;
for(i=0; msg[i] != '\0'; *(screen++) = 0x1F00 |
Hi all,
I have a routing problem that I can't understand.
I have firewall equipped with OpenBSD 4.3.
On this machine i have 3 nic:
nic A: 89.96.AA.xx/28
nic B: 89.96.BB.xx/29
nic C: 10.1.1.0/24
As you can read, nic A and nic B are on different and separate subnets.
I've put on /etc/mygate the
Federico escreveu:
Hi all,
I have a routing problem that I can't understand.
I have firewall equipped with OpenBSD 4.3.
On this machine i have 3 nic:
nic A: 89.96.AA.xx/28
nic B: 89.96.BB.xx/29
nic C: 10.1.1.0/24
As you can read, nic A and nic B are on different and separate subnets.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:07:22PM +0200, Federico wrote:
Hi all,
I have a routing problem that I can't understand.
I have firewall equipped with OpenBSD 4.3.
On this machine i have 3 nic:
nic A: 89.96.AA.xx/28
nic B: 89.96.BB.xx/29
nic C: 10.1.1.0/24
As you can read, nic A and nic
Well I guess I will have to resolve this by coding something. What do you
think about this:
There will be a daemon that has a list of logged users. When a user logs in
a small program is launched that tell the daemon the user has logged in. The
daemon looks for the user in the list of users, If
Also, if your subnets mask
are wrong, it could explain this behavior.
You've got it!
Such a blindness! ...
I found a wrong broadcast address in an alias. Damn...
Ok, thank you guys for this flash of inspiration, the flu is stunning me.
Cya
Giancarlo, thank you for your ideas.
2) Regarding hfsc, what is the old bandwidth statement used for? It
seems
like it would be obsolete. Changing it doesn't seem to affect
anything,
either. The manpage doesn't say. :)
What do you mean by old bandwidth?
I mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I just had a massive power failure and my raid drive is failing with a:
cannot alloc NNN bytes for blockmap
cannot alloc NNN bytes for lncntp
searching the archives and man pages for both OpenBSD and FreeBSD reveals:
fsck_ffs(3) freebsd
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Maximo Pech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/22 Maximo Pech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will be a ssh tunnel, I want to share it with a few friends, but I
don't want them sharing it with someone else because if a lot of people
start using it my upload bandwidth
@brnhnahk|: KIA CERATO
Vber: Wepm{i
Dbhc`rek|: 2.03 QVVT
Jnpnaj`: LR
Jnlokejr`vh: EU
Opnaec: 28 000
Cnd: 2007
Dno. nanpsdnb`mhe: G`yhr` dbhc`rek, jnf`m{i psk|, l`cmhrntnm - Kenwood(1 CD,
USB, MP3), o`pjrpnmhj - SteelMate p`gcnbnpwhb{i, qhcm`kj` - Pantera q
dbsuqrnpnmmei qbg|~|, weuk{ m` bqe
Hi,
I have an X31 which I have installed -current on. It has an ipw card:
ipw0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 rev 0x04: irq 11
Its function seems to work for a while, then I get:
Sep 24 15:22:35 x31 /bsd: ipw0: fatal firmware error
Sep 24 15:22:36 x31 /bsd: ipw0: timeout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, it is also important to note that this is a 3TB single
partition with ffs2
thanks again
Jason
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFI2nEe2ZVbbZM1O8gRAoO1AKCGudcFAzNG+heHSvkH1f3Ql04cEACeNhaj
3eshHXLM8CGSSp2sZO3pWXo=
=vPPP
-END PGP
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:51:00PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi,
I have an X31 which I have installed -current on. It has an ipw card:
ipw0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 rev 0x04: irq 11
Its function seems to work for a while, then I get:
Sep 24 15:22:35 x31 /bsd: ipw0:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Jason Sidabras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, it is also important to note that this is a 3TB single
partition with ffs2
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#LargeDrive
Chris McGee escreveu:
Giancarlo, thank you for your ideas.
2) Regarding hfsc, what is the old bandwidth statement used for? It
seems
like it would be obsolete. Changing it doesn't seem to affect
anything,
either. The manpage doesn't say. :)
On 24.09-09:48, Maximo Pech wrote:
Well I guess I will have to resolve this by coding something. What do you
think about this:
[ ... ]
would you not be better to use ALTQ to limit the bandwidth available
to each user? then if they share their password their only sharing
their own use?
if not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Chris,
I am a little worried about running `fsck -p` in case of loss of data
but I did it and edited my fstab.
once booted I still have no luck running fsck_ffs:
error is now:
cannot alloc NNN bytes for statemap
dmesg follows:
OpenBSD 4.3
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Afaik, erasing a disk 7x7 times using a truly random source of
entrophy, using the proton decay multiplexed with the frequency of
solar flares on alpha centauri, and just dd'ing /dev/zero to the drive
*ONE* time makes no
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Riteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could be the same problem than Linux users are seeing:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/21/3358724
This is not good especially as I have opened the back plate on my X31
to find no mini-pci slot to
Thanks Ted and Chris,
I have to go pick up some more RAM, i don't have a system I can take down to
shift this over.
Jason
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Jason Sidabras
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Chris,
I am a little worried about
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:34:36AM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
/etc/fstab (line of interest):
/dev/sd0a /pub_raid ffs rw,noexec,softdep 0 2
I can't seem to edit my fstab in single user mode because everything
is ro. System has 2GB of real memory and is running bsd.mp GENERIC. I
You can
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
Thanks Ted and Chris,
I have to go pick up some more RAM, i don't have a system I can take down to
shift this over.
That won't help. You are running into MAXDSIZE, which is not increased
by adding RAM.
-Otto
Jason
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Brian Keefer wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero
of=/rsd0
was humming along quite nicely when I left
On 2008-09-24, tico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that
simply adding allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48 would allow
the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announcing to me be added
from the RIB into the FIB, however this was not the
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:28:01PM -0500, tico wrote:
On 2008-09-24, tico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that
simply adding allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48 would allow
the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announcing to me be
Hi,
I have put all my eggs in this basket so I am desperate to get this fixed.
This may only be a tcpdump issue. If I have 19 interfaces tcpdump works as
expected. If I have 20 or more it fails.
First I try with 20 interfaces setup and I get:
# tcpdump -nttt -i bge0
tcpdump: Failed to open
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:50:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
...
So the problems I see are the following:
1) the (inet|inet6) parameter either doesn't work, doesn't work
consistently, or at the very least doesn't work as described in the man
page for bgpd.conf(5) IMHO.
2) the
I also told him to get a -current amd64 with 3.5GB. i've got a few
things running on my amd64 at home w/ 4.1GB working set.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
Thanks Ted and Chris,
I have to
Support for d-link dfe-550tx(st201) in amd64 arch is broken or only disable?
i386 works fine in GENERIC 4.3 kernel.
Jacek
--
System poczty na jablko.one.pl
That's me some 3 weeks ago:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=122099826019882w=2
In short, it's the exact same situation (X31, IPW2100 etc.).
As detailed in my original message, there's a sort of workaround:
ifconfig ipw0 up first and them try rescanning. Usually works for me,
but still need to
On 2008-09-24, Carl Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put all my eggs in this basket so I am desperate to get this fixed.
This may only be a tcpdump issue. If I have 19 interfaces tcpdump works as
expected. If I have 20 or more it fails.
First I try with 20 interfaces setup and I get:
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 13:39:54 Edd Barrett wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Riteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This could be the same problem than Linux users are seeing:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/21/3358724
This is not good especially as I
Stuart,
Thanks so much. I am using urlsnarf to log url requests and there is one
instance running for each gre tunnel. I have a script that auto starts or
stop one as soon as I added or removed a tunnel. So when I added a tunnel it
would fire up a new instance breaking tcpdump. Removing the
Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
and built it. It gives the following error:
# /usr/local/tcpdump/sbin/tcpdump -nttt -i bge0
tcpdump: /dev/bpf10: No such file or directory
When I look in /dev I see bpf0 through bpf9.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Carl Horne wrote:
Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
and built it. It gives the following error:
Carl,
I think you are going down a more dangerous path then you might need to
do here.
You are mixing many things now.
I would start first by running
On 2008/09/24 14:12, Carl Horne wrote:
Stuart,
Thanks so much. I am using urlsnarf to log url requests and there
is one instance running for each gre tunnel. I have a script that
auto starts or stop one as soon as I added or removed a tunnel. So
when I added a tunnel it would fire up a
On 2008-09-24, Carl Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
and built it. It gives the following error:
Take care with non-OpenBSD versions of tcpdump, most (all?) still don't
jail the protocol dissectors into an unprivileged
On 2008-09-24, wolk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Support for d-link dfe-550tx(st201) in amd64 arch is broken or only disable?
i386 works fine in GENERIC 4.3 kernel.
This gives a good clue:
$ fgrep ste* /sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
#ste* at pci? # Sundance ST201 ethernet
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:52:05PM -0600, Carl Horne wrote:
Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
and built it. It gives the following error:
this will likey not work. openbsd tcpdump is heavily modified from
the upstream. there are parts of this you
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-24, wolk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Support for d-link dfe-550tx(st201) in amd64 arch is broken or only disable?
i386 works fine in GENERIC 4.3 kernel.
This gives a good clue:
$ fgrep ste*
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Riteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could be the same problem than Linux users are seeing:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/21/3358724
This is not good especially as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Used bsd.rd -current and increased my RAM to 3.1GB. No luck.
Looked into changing MAXDSIZ in
/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/include/vmparam.h and compiling a bsd.rd from
- -STABLE just so I can run fsck_ffs.
Increasing MAXDSIZ from (1*1024*1024*1024) to
It was just a quick test. I did not install it.
Thanks,
Carl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:47 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Does OpenBSD only allow 19 Interfaces
On
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Jason Sidabras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing MAXDSIZ from (1*1024*1024*1024) to (2*1024*1024*1024),
which is well within my RAM limits and larger than the number the
error says it is having trouble allocating (183MB).
And this is where my expertise ends.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:59 AM, alemus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to compile a simple program written in C with -fno-stack-protector
option and i have some troubles...
this is my simple file main.c:
int main()
{
int i;
short int *screen = (short int *) 0xB8000;
char
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Dan Harnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's under the keyboard on the X31 and relatively easy to get to. The
hardware maintenance manual has full instructions.
Thanks everyone for the replies.
I found the mini pci and mail you all noe from a wi(4), it
Leader europien de la mise en relation B to B
DOSSIER SPECIAL : INFORMATIQUE ET SECURITE INFORMATIQUE.
Connaissez vous les risques de ne pas avoir de sauvegarde ? Savez quand cas de
perte de vos donnies sans sauvegarde votre assurance ne vous prend pas en
charge ?
Il existe aujourd'hui des
I'm trying to set up a virtualised qemu OpenBSD kernel debug
environment, with a reasonable amount of success, but am running into
the following problem on bootup :
com1: at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3panic: com_isa_attach: mapping failed
The operating system has halted
Presumably because the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Ted.
I'd be willing to test patches if OBSD needs it. Otherwise it looks
like I have enough disk space in my hot spare to move the system over.
When reformatting what block size should be used to reduce the fsck
overhead. Per 14.7:
Larger
I am running 4.3 (june 4 snapshot) and I'm using spamd in the default
greylisting mode. Works fine. Now I would like to know what is the
best way to immediately turn off greylisting mode and enter
blacklisting mode only. Stopping spamd and then starting it with the
'-b' switch? Or do I need to
Hi folks. I'm trying to get my Nintendo DS to use my OpenBSD 4.3 router to
access the internet, but it's sort of inconsistent. Everything works on
unencrypted wifi, but only some games work when I turn WEP on. After some
research, the most likely culprit appears to be that some NDS games don't
I have set up an aggressive mode VPN between a cisco 877 and OpenBSD server.
The SA seems to have set up correctly however the connection only
appears to pass traffic from the cisco to the server.
The private IPs on the cisco have a nat exemption to keep it from
natting when going through the
Yay!
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:50:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
...
So the problems I see are the following:
1) the (inet|inet6) parameter either doesn't work, doesn't work
consistently, or at the very least doesn't work as described in the man
page for
62 matches
Mail list logo
