On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
For the masses:
- NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
- OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
- FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
It's a mistake to make this association.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:00:31AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
-I If scripts exist for a given package, do not execute them.
This does not work... I will re-check, but pkg_add -vvvI shows that
scripts are executed.
Well, one of my client would like
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:00:31AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
-I If scripts exist for a given package, do not execute them.
This does not work... I will re-check, but pkg_add -vvvI shows that
scripts are executed.
Well, one
OBSD is the best choice of OS for people who like violent little fish
mascots.
And it has blue-boot-console-thingy (tm) . Ace.
On 20/06/2009, at 8:24 AM, Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
Hi,
Today i some pages are publishing news about a apache DOS tool for
example (http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6601) and http://
ha.ckers.org/blog/20090617/slowloris-http-dos/
Does this applies to the openbsd apache to
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Kester
Sent: 19 June 2009 20:24
To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 11:23:26 PDT Michael R. Wayne wrote:
OK, I'm going
From: Anton Parol anton.pa...@sun.com
OBSD is the best choice of OS for people who like violent little fish
mascots.
And it has blue-boot-console-thingy (tm) . Ace.
I wasn't going to contribute to this thread, but I have to ask. *What*
blue-boot-console-thingy?
I'm not sure it's sensible
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 05:57:09PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe I just wrote too many words. In simple terms, once a new route
Daniel Bolgheroni schrieb:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
For the masses:
- NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
- OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
- FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:31:01PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 20/06/2009, at 8:24 AM, Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
Hi,
Today i some pages are publishing news about a apache DOS tool for
example (http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6601) and http://
On 22/06/2009, at 9:25 PM, Aiko Barz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:31:01PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 20/06/2009, at 8:24 AM, Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
Hi,
Today i some pages are publishing news about a apache DOS tool for
example
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:32:56PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote:
The solution, like the problem, lies in the network layer. See iptables
and similar network stack filters to provide protection against this
vector./unquote
Seems like they (and you) are saying are Apache is not the place for
Hi!
I would like to log a SYN packet in the beginning of sessions and the
FIN and/or RST packet at the end with the new match action.
cat pf.conf
set skip on lo
block in log
pass out
match in log flags S/S
match in log flags F/F
match in log flags R/R
pass in proto tcp from any to (vic0) port
Hi,
It seems there is no ldap backend for powerdns. Does anyone know why ?
Bambero
Does anybody know the status of large memory support in 4.5/amd64? I
found this about 4.4 not finding the full 4GB:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/12/15/4420904
And this about bigmem causing boot failure:
Hi all,
I just noticed that the link to the OpenBSD Nixspam mirror is broken on
http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/. Any ideas what happened?
I'm not sure if this is the right place to report this, please let me
know if not and who should I ping to get this fixed.
Cheers,
Andrew.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:37:08 +0100
Gaby Vanhegan g...@vanhegan.net wrote:
I have a machine with 4GB RAM and a quad core Xeon processor. Will it
be able to see the full 4GB of RAM or will I have to tweak bigmem,
either by building a custom kernel (really don't want to do that) or
by
I received permission to set up our sftp/ftp server under Openbsd.
Is there a best practices doc for doing so?
I'm reading:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#ftpchroot
and
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ftpdsektion=8
thanks in advance
roland dominguez
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 04:36:58PM +0200, Jonas Thambert wrote:
Aiko Barz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:32:56PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote:
The solution, like the problem, lies in the network layer. See iptables
and similar network stack filters to provide protection against this
On 22 Jun 2009, at 14:58, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:37:08 +0100
Gaby Vanhegan g...@vanhegan.net wrote:
I have a machine with 4GB RAM and a quad core Xeon processor. Will
it
be able to see the full 4GB of RAM or will I have to tweak bigmem,
either by building a custom
Aiko Barz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:32:56PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote:
The solution, like the problem, lies in the network layer. See iptables
and similar network stack filters to provide protection against this
vector./unquote
Seems like they (and you) are saying are Apache is
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 03:59:35PM +0100, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
On 22 Jun 2009, at 14:58, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:37:08 +0100
Gaby Vanhegan g...@vanhegan.net wrote:
I have a machine with 4GB RAM and a quad core Xeon processor. Will
it
be able to see the full 4GB of RAM
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Gaby Vanhegang...@vanhegan.net wrote:
I'd gathered that from reading one of those threads to the end. I really
wanted to avoid having to build a custom kernel, especially if the results
might not even work. I suppose I was just inquiring about the status of
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Gaby Vanhegang...@vanhegan.net wrote:
I'd gathered that from reading one of those threads to the end. I really
wanted to avoid having to build a custom kernel, especially if the results
might not even work. I suppose I was just inquiring about the status of
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Claudio Jekercje...@diehard.n-r-g.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 05:57:09PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
Hello,
I have a setup with 2 openBSD boxes used as firewall, redundancy is made using
CARP.
Each has 4 NIC : 1 for internet, 1 for pfsync, and the two last are used as a
trunk, collecting all other VLANs.
Master's advskew is 10, slave's is 50.
All worked like a charm since nearly 2 years, but
Hello,
Is there any way to apply dnsbl feature just on port 25 on the
default openbsd sendmail configuration and do not apply that on port 587
(just auth smtp)?
I googled it looking for answers but it seems people disabled dnsbl
feature on sendmail and used it with spamassasin (which is
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:52:23AM -0500, Dominguez, Roland wrote:
I received permission to set up our sftp/ftp server under Openbsd.
Is there a best practices doc for doing so?
I'm reading:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#ftpchroot
and
Hello list,
I have a question:
I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the
distributed software with best performance, but really i don't know much
about it.
There are some technicals or philosophicals reasons why the OpenBSD
repository does not change to something other
If it ain't broken don't fix it.
What is wrong with CVS? And no I am not talking about the hypotheticals
and some bugs that exist in the current code (that can also be easily
worked around).
I have used just about all versioning systems, including ones that have
the price tag of islands in the
Pretty much every single new revision control system can import/export
from CVS, so use whatever you want...
-anil
On 22 Jun 2009, at 19:44, Fernando Quintero wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question:
I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the
distributed software
On 2009-06-22, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:00:31AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
-I If scripts exist for a given package, do not execute them.
This does not work... I will re-check, but
Hi,
Are there any students or researchers from Kent Uni or Canterbury on this list?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer)
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
The FIN/RST packets match the existing state created by the pass rule,
so these packets don't touch the ruleset at all.
Sounds like you either want no state (though this has many drawbacks),
extra code to do something between log and log (all), or some other
way to record these sessions (pflow?).
On 2009-06-22, Bambero bamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems there is no ldap backend for powerdns. Does anyone know why ?
Bambero
Because when I last looked at adding it, I found more important
problems with the port to fix first.
On 23/06/2009, at 6:44 AM, Fernando Quintero wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question:
I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the
distributed software with best performance, but really i don't know
much
about it.
There are some technicals or philosophicals reasons why
What is the rationale for excluding balsa from ports? Some glaring vuln?
Best,
--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halibut. I am
not a looney! Why should I be tarred with the epithet looney merely
because I have a pet halibut?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Eric d'Alibuteric.hali...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the rationale for excluding balsa from ports? Some glaring vuln?
Probably a glaring lack of submissions. You could also mail the ports
list, which is the list where the people who know about ports tend to
Hi,
The openbsd-proto.mc file has these lines:
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Address=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Address=::, Name=MTA6, M=O')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Address=0.0.0.0, Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E')dnl
Paul M wrote:
On 23/06/2009, at 6:44 AM, Fernando Quintero wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question:
I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the
distributed software with best performance, but really i don't know
much
about it.
There are some technicals or
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Mike Swanson wrote:
Paul M wrote:
On 23/06/2009, at 6:44 AM, Fernando Quintero wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question:
I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the
distributed software with best performance, but really i don't know much
about it.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:13:51PM -0700, Mike Swanson wrote:
Paul M wrote:
On 23/06/2009, at 6:44 AM, Fernando Quintero wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question:
I was reading about version control systems and i found a lot of the
distributed software with best performance, but really i
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Daniel Dickman said,
Eric, attached is a starting point if you -- or someone else -- want
to finish the work to get balsa ported over. The patches are quick
hacks to get it to compile (so you'll need to investigate why it
doesn't compile and fix properly) and
A very recent submission (not yet clearly linked) to the OpenBSD website
is the ports handbook. You should check it out:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/
I await your submission for the port you'd like.
-ME
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:15:21AM -0400, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:19:09PM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
According to the /usr/share/sendmail/README file, it is necessary to
add the a modifier to the line that define the MSA: Additionally, by
using the M=a modifier you can require authentication before messages
are
46 matches
Mail list logo
