On 11:34, Tue 03 Nov 09, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 interfaces rl1 and sk0. I would like to see their logs separately
using
#pfctl -s info
if I put
set loginterface rl1
set loginterface sk0
in /etc/pf.conf and type
#pfctl -s info
it only shows log for sk0
* Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com [2009-11-03 07:07]:
I have 2 interfaces rl1 and sk0. I would like to see their logs separately
using
#pfctl -s info
can't.
if I put
set loginterface rl1
set loginterface sk0
in /etc/pf.conf and type
#pfctl -s info
it only shows log for sk0
Hello,
I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
the access point just now), i get a panic then get put in dbd. Does
anyone know of
]hracat Pazarlar} ve M|~teri Ar
]hracat
Pazarlar} ve M|~teri Ara~t}rma Teknikleri
Epitimi
Epitimin Amac}
Epitimimizin temel amac} depi~en d|nya
On 2009-11-03, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
the access point just now), i
Hello!
I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
block in all
pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh
pass out quick on $ext_if
pass in quick on $ext_if no state
pass in quick on vlan609 from vlan609:network to
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
| Hello!
|
| I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
|
| Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
| block in all
| pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh
| pass out quick on $ext_if
|
* Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua [2009-11-03 14:40]:
I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
no.
Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
But after they loaded pfctl -sr shows another order:
how about reading the manpages for a change. sometimes i wonder why we
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 02:49:36PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
| Hello!
|
| I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
|
| Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
| block in all
| pass in quick on $ext_if
On 3 November 2009 G. 16:32:29 Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello!
I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
block in all
pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh
pass out quick on $ext_if
pass in quick on
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 05:00:39PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Does anyone know how to disable this? Thanks in advance!
1. Why do you want to disable this? Did you even noticed actual problems?
2. See pf.conf(5), particularly part about ruleset-optimization option.
But better you read
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
dmesg, trace, ps.
Device is at home but will provide that tomorrow.
Cheers,
Steph
Please let me know if you were still looking for directories of US doctors or
dentists.
I have US medical professional lists, let me know what you need and I will get
you some more info, samples and a very reasonable price.
you can reach me at: ste...@bestchoiceformed.org
For your
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:01 -0700, Lawrence-Sporkton wrote:
I believe its the Gobi 1000 or Gobi UNDP-1 which appear to be the same
device
Very odd. This is a CDMA/3G/GSM/EVDO modem?
Normally they show up as PCMICIA, USB, or PCI Serial devices.
A lot of times the PCMCIA ones present a USB
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 22:08 +0100, C. Diego Raffaelli A. wrote:
Any idea? Am i right using OpenBSD and trying to use Radius and/or
NAS??
RADIUS Authentication and RADIUS Accounting are what you want, but
that's off-topic for this list.
Look in ports for RADIUS servers.
Good luck.
~BAS
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:34:24 -0500
Luis Useche use...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Today I watched the presentation by Bob Beck about the OpenBSD VFS
hacking where he talked about the buffer cache and how it recently
changed (among many other things). Following his advice, I tried to
increase
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
method going back perhaps two years before than the commit, but we
gnashed our teeth a lot to try to find other solutions. Clever
cpu
Gentile Cliente, l abbiamo provata a contattare telefonicamente senza
nessun esito, in rif alla sua carta n 4539 la banca dove
addebita l estratto conto ha stornato l addebito del mese di settembre.
La preghiamo di confermare i dati in nostro possesso accedendo ai servizi
on line
2009/11/3 Claire beuserie claire.beuse...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
method going back perhaps two years before than the commit, but we
gnashed our teeth
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:43:08AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:44:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-11-03, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua wrote:
Because I need queuing for outgoing traffic on vlan* interfaces.
When keep state is used then
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:44:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-11-03, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua wrote:
Because I need queuing for outgoing traffic on vlan* interfaces.
When keep state is used then queues for outgoing traffic do not work.
this (and variations) keep
On 2009-11-03, Alexander Shikoff minot...@crete.org.ua wrote:
Because I need queuing for outgoing traffic on vlan* interfaces.
When keep state is used then queues for outgoing traffic do not work.
this (and variations) keep coming up (and has been answered 3 or 4
times in various mailing
On 2009-10-19, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
Just since upgrade46.html mentions the new syntax for packet scrubbing
and specifically describes the behavior of the no-df flag, perhaps it
should mention that the 4.6-release (and 4.6-stable?) kernel uses the
opposite semantics for
GLOBAL TRADUZIONI PROFESSIONALI
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
1.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
2.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
3.jpg]
[demime 1.01d
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
the access point just
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:57:59AM +0100, Claire beuserie wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
method going back perhaps two years before than the commit, but we
My interpretation is that yes, they identified it as a possibility, but
due to limitations of the Intel platform, there wasn't an obvious,
clean, correct way to fix it.
I don't think this is a primary exploit, however. You would have to
have a buffer overflow or something in some other app
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
gonz...@sepp0.com.ar wrote:
2009/11/3 Claire beuserie claire.beuse...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:58:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[bcc'd to Dan Goodin @ theregister]
If anyone wants a choice quote from me about the recent Linux holes,
this is what I have to say:
Linus is too busy thinking about masturabating monkeys, he doesn't
have time to care
Henning Brauer wrote:
how about reading the manpages for a change. sometimes i wonder why we
write them.
Please, PLEASE don't stop :)
Seriously, this is one area where OpenBSD (and probably other BSDs, too)
romp on Linux. I was debugging my pf syntax last weekend and took the
time to
Hi Guys,
Today I watched the presentation by Bob Beck about the OpenBSD VFS
hacking where he talked about the buffer cache and how it recently
changed (among many other things). Following his advice, I tried to
increase my buffer cache size with no success. The commands I am
running:
$ sysctl
[bcc'd to Dan Goodin @ theregister]
If anyone wants a choice quote from me about the recent Linux holes,
this is what I have to say:
Linus is too busy thinking about masturabating monkeys, he doesn't
have time to care about Linux security.
For the record, this particular problem was
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
I replaced Linux around '01 or '02 with OpenBSD both at companies I've
worked for since and at home. I don't really care what other people use
for their needs, and I've been neutral in my opinion about Torvalds
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
I replaced Linux around '01 or '02 with OpenBSD both at companies I've
worked for since and at home. I don't really care what other people use
for their needs, and I've been neutral in my opinion about
2009/11/3 Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:58:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[bcc'd to Dan Goodin @ theregister]
If anyone wants a choice quote from me about the recent Linux holes,
this is what I have to say:
Linus is too busy thinking about masturabating
2009/11/3 Luis Useche use...@gmail.com:
I read in the 4.6 changelog that his was part of the release.
Am I missing something? Do I have to recompile? Or this is just a bug?
Yeah you are missing something. Listen to the *whole* presentation and
read the *whole* changelog. This is *not* in 4.6
36 matches
Mail list logo
