On 2 October 2010 02:16, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Gregory Edigarov g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua [2010-09-30 16:13]:
nut is in ports, though I would recomend to build it by hands.
sigh. cut the crap. the package is fine. and handbuilding is stupid,
pretty much without
CbrCB6mmel CB)rtesCB-tCBnk, hogy ismCB)t elindult a rowiw! LCB!togasd
meg az oldalt, CB)s vedd fel CB:jra a kapcsolatot a barCB!taiddal, vagy
tegyCB)l szert CB:j ismerCbsCB6kre!
BCB!rmilyen CB)szrevCB)teled van az oldallal kapcsolatban, szCB-vesen
vCB!rjuk a leveled a
2010/10/3, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net:
Does this also happen with udp mounts?
Yes, it does.
--
Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
Off topic, was he looking for 4.8 release:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=532_1285949897
Please file a bugreport, including all details. A tcpdump of the packages sent
and received can help in finding where the bug is.
-Otto
Op 3 okt. 2010 om 09:54 heeft Alexander Polakov polac...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
2010/10/3, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net:
Does this also happen
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 10:46:59PM -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
I've got a problem where I have a couple of OpenBSD firewalls
running in a redundant configuration using carp, and have found
that CentOS 5.5 (Linux) boxes running on a protected network, if
they have avahi-daemon running, will
* YayD1ndaki tCrkCnCn sC6zleri! (anD1nda okuyup tCrkCye eE lik edin)
* YayD1ndaki tCrkCyC sC6yleyen sanatC'D1! (kimdir resimli C6zgeC'miE i)
* TCrkClere yorum yapD1n! (yorum yaptD1D D1nD1z tCrkC her C'aldD1D D1nda
yorumlar da gC6zCkCr)
* YayD1ndaki tCrkCyC Facebook'ta paylaE D1n!
* YayD1ndaki
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 18.15 -0400, Daniel Browning-Weber ha
scritto:
Is the use of both route-to and divert-packet in the same PF rule
supported?
divert-packet should be currently used alone. It sends the packet up to
userspace and any other options are lost.
Para ver este correo por favor utilice un cliente de correo moderno
Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
You seem to be using a custom compiled kernel. I didn't spot any
explanation of that (-stable patches? changes to kernel config?).
Non-GENERIC kernels make developers nervous.
Nothing custom; it's 4.7 stable with patches 001 through 006
Okay, and the divert (4) man page says that outbound packets,
after being reinjected, are processed directly by the relevant
IP/IPv6 output function, so I probably can't get pf to take
another look at them so that route-to will apply.
If I were feeling brave and wanted to mess with this in the
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a panic.
I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below.
--
Ed Ahlsen-Girard
Ft. Walton Beach FL
trace for 2 October
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
panic.
I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below.
You are mixing a recent snapshot and an lkm which has
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:35:06PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote:
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
panic.
You installed? Not updated?
I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
panic.
I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below.
You are mixing a recent snapshot and an lkm which
And even then, since it is code from other people, it still might have a
bug in it regarding the malloc flags -- either of those is now required,
as the assert says.
But remember, the flags value changed. The lkm source might be correct -
it might be correct.
it just needs to be
And even then, since it is code from other people, it still might have a
bug in it regarding the malloc flags -- either of those is now required,
as the assert says.
But remember, the flags value changed. The lkm source might be correct -
it just needs to be recompiled to match the kernel it
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
I think your somewhere near re theory might have some merrit to it. :)
I've had a number of crashes over the past couple days, but this one
* Steve W st...@witucke.net [2010-10-03 22:16]:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
I think your somewhere near re theory might have some merrit to it. :)
well, it is
* Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de [2010-10-03 22:28]:
* Steve W st...@witucke.net [2010-10-03 22:16]:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
I think your somewhere
Then why is it placed there in the FAQ entry? Somebody thought there's a
relation there.
IMHO, I think ksh should be able to read .profile by default.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
acam...@verlet.org wrote:
.Xdefaults has nothing to do with .profile ...
[IMAGE]
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un ejecutivo con gusto le
atendera
Tels. (33)
Szanowni Panstwo,
Zwracam sie z pytaniem, czy jestescie Panstwo zainteresowani jednorazowym
otrzymaniem oferty tlumaczen pisemnych.
Pozdrawiam,
ETLUMACZENIA
*Niniejsze zapytanie nie jest informacja handlowa, a jedynie pytaniem** o zgode
na przesylanie informacji handlowych droga
Subject:Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots
From: Theo de Raadt deraadt () cvs ! openbsd ! org
Date: 2010-10-03 19:24:19
Message-ID: 201010031924.o93JOJb1029879 () cvs ! openbsd ! org
[Download message RAW]
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:41:50 +0200, you wrote:
err... reading the trace first helps. this is actually pretty clearly a
problem in re. I don't feel responsible for re tho :)
Is there something else I should do before submitting something to bugs?
Both of these source files haven't been modified
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:24:18 +0200, you wrote:
well, it is easy enough to verify - use something else but re. if it's
stable, we have the guilty party, at least.
Yea, I'm sort of stuck with re. Here's a few quick images of these boxes. It's
a
Jetway NF76 board with a daughter card with 3
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
Then why is it placed there in the FAQ entry? Somebody thought there's a
relation there.
IMHO, I think ksh should be able to read .profile by default.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
I am building a replacement router/firewall for home use and am
soliciting suggestions/commentary/alternatives on the components
below.
I've heard good things on the list about Supermicro boards; any
surprises with their Atom D510 embedded boxes? Looks like em(4)
support, which I believe is is
On 10/03/10 22:11, David Higgs wrote:
I am building a replacement router/firewall for home use
stop there.
You aren't General Motors, Yahoo, or Google.
You are looking to spend a lot of time and money trying to optimize
performance on a super-fast-sport-car that will be only used to go to
and
Connaissez-vous la signification du mot
B+nbsp;PROCRASTINERnbsp;B;nbsp; ?
Si c'est le cas, il est indiscutable
que les techniques de gestion du temps vous
sont familiC(res, ou
du moins, que vous vous y intC)ressez
Updated.
I very rarely install the last couple of years.
Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:35:06PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote:
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
panic.
You installed? Not updated?
I
9 de octubre actividad de capacitacisn en: Gestisn efectiva de clientes
Montevideo, Hotel Lafayette
Si no visualiza la invitacisn puede solicitar el folleto electrsnico por esta
misma vma. Gracias.
CUPOS LIMITADOS
Informes y reservas: 2315-3330
Este mail no es spam. Si usted entiende que le
32 matches
Mail list logo
