gwes ohxer:
What is the recommended pf.conf to get symmetrical routing
for incoming and outgoing connections using a dual-homed
gateway and internal hosts with static IPs on both WANs?
I'm assuming route-to and reply-to are the correct
tools to use.
I've looked at the FAQ,
Hello,
I got the idea from FAQ that OpenBSD is not using more than one core
from multicore processors.
Pretending I got it right, what's the benefit to buy an Intel Core 2
Duo ? Just the bigger cache and some extra instructions?
Is there a difference in how OpenBSD handles let's say a multicore
On 6 January 2011 10:58, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list
I have a OpenBSD wifi AP and it has a ral 2860 device
I need to modify the rts values like in this link
http://supremetechs.com/2009/07/24/slow-wifi-iphone-3gs/
does ifconfig have this ability?
mtu setting
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Fred Crowson fred.crow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 January 2011 10:58, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list
I have a OpenBSD wifi AP and it has a ral 2860 device
I need to modify the rts values like in this link
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:45:05 +0200
Mihai Popescu B.S. mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the idea from FAQ that OpenBSD is not using more than one core
from multicore processors.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#SMP
As soon as you run more than just the kernel on your system (...), the
other
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:20:03PM +0100, Christian Kildau wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a hard time getting vpnc (0.5.3) from packages to work on 4.8.
I have it running on Mac OS X (and Linux also), but it just doesn't work(tm)
on OpenBSD.
Everything get's set up properly (in my eyes). The
(Sorry Piere, that was meant to go to the list in the first place...)
I have pf disabled on the vpnc machine. But I indeed have pf running
on my gateway (doing nat). But as I said, it does work with other
machines.
Or do I really have to open anything up on the gateway?
2011/1/6 Pierre-Emmanuel
While we're piling on ...
I have three interfaces, vr0 is my internet (pppoe), vr1 and vr2 are
my internal networks.
This gives me a good mental picture ...
# packet filtering
block all
# pppoe0:network
pass out on pppoe0 inet from (pppoe0) to any
pass out on pppoe0 inet from vr1:network
On 1/5/2011 at 2:56 PM Axton wrote:
|On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mike. the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
|
| On 1/4/2011 at 10:57 PM Josh Smith wrote:
|
| |
| |pass in on $int_if0 # pass all incomming traffic on our internal
| interface
| |pass in on $int_if1 # pass all incomming traffic on our
--
--
Powered by PHPlist, www.phplist.com --
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
mail9_4_0.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
mail9_4_1.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
I know OpenBSD is built for security.
Using OpenBSD with bigmem on Mysql and PHP (No need for apache) machine.
How much of a preformance difference is there from FreeBSD??
Looking for % or TBS or QBS.
Machines will be mini 1U.
one Quad core and 8GB of ram.
Thanks and yes OpenBSD is built for
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:43:51AM -0500, Ben Adams wrote:
I know OpenBSD is built for security.
Using OpenBSD with bigmem on Mysql and PHP (No need for apache) machine.
How much of a preformance difference is there from FreeBSD??
Looking for % or TBS or QBS.
Machines will be mini 1U.
one
This is my not-so-technical understanding.
OpenBSD's current SMP status:
- The kernel uses a single lock for shared data. My understanding is
that this means that the kernel itself doesn't benefit from SMP as
much as it could otherwise, but it does use multiple cores. (I
believe, but would like
If I send mail to this_user then delivery is okay. If I send mail
to root:
$ mail
No mail for this_user
# mail
No mail for root
- this is smtpd.conf:
that_if= re0
listen on lo0
listen on $that_if
#listen on $wan_if tls enable auth
map aliases { source db /etc/mail/aliases.db }
accept for
On 01/05/11 18:17, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
On 01/04/2011 08:02 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:34:08PM +, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
I have a machine with 4.7 softraid CRYPTO.
On the upgrade48.html it's recommended to rebuild the softraid volume
I believe rebuild means
On 01/06/11 06:44, Mihai Popescu B.S. wrote:
Hello,
I got the idea from FAQ that OpenBSD is not using more than one core
from multicore processors.
please indicate where you got that from...
I can't do much about crap you ...read on the 'net..., but if there is
something in the FAQ that
* Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net [2011-01-06 18:04]:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:43:51AM -0500, Ben Adams wrote:
I know OpenBSD is built for security.
Using OpenBSD with bigmem on Mysql and PHP (No need for apache) machine.
How much of a preformance difference is there from FreeBSD??
Looking
That link (and this thread) read like the blind leading the blind.
Enabling RTS/CTS with packet sizes above 1500 is probably not what is fixing
his problem
And changing the mtu has nothing to do with any of this.
If enabling RTS fixes problems, then using a cleaner frequency should do the
Jeremy Chase [jeremych...@gmail.com] wrote:
This is my not-so-technical understanding.
OpenBSD's current SMP status:
- The kernel uses a single lock for shared data. My understanding is
that this means that the kernel itself doesn't benefit from SMP as
much as it could otherwise, but it
Please keep in mind that bigmem is unsupported and it may not work as
expected.
ot
The support part can be a big issue and it's important if you are using
OpenBSD within your business to calculate the risk that you can't buy
support directly from OpenBSD. There are consultants in most countries
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:43 -0500, Ben Adams wrote:
I know OpenBSD is built for security.
Using OpenBSD with bigmem on Mysql and PHP (No need for apache) machine.
How much of a preformance difference is there from FreeBSD??
Looking for % or TBS or QBS.
Machines will be mini 1U.
one Quad
Greetings. This is my first post to the OpenBSD community, so please
let me know if I'm in the wrong list, this is just too basic or any
other faux pas.
Under the default ksh, the default /root/.profile and indeed a
completely fresh 4.8 install, adding the following line to
/root/.profile does
Thank you for your reply, Roberth
The default prompt is `$ ' for non-root users, `# ' for root.
If ksh is invoked by root and PS1 does not contain a `#'
character, the default value will be used even if PS1 already
exists in the environment.
But isn't PS1 supposed to alter the (default)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:18 PM, xSAPPYx xsap...@gmail.com wrote:
I think ksh(1) man page has the info, or maybe it is intro(8)
Try this:
echo export ENV=$HOME/.kshrc ~/.profile
echo . /etc/ksh.kshrc ~/.kshrc
Yes, in that case the new PS1 value is set by ~/.kshrc, which
overrides
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:35:32 +0100
Ezequiel Garzsn garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:18 PM, xSAPPYx xsap...@gmail.com wrote:
I think ksh(1) man page has the info, or maybe it is intro(8)
Try this:
echo export ENV=$HOME/.kshrc ~/.profile
echo . /etc/ksh.kshrc
On 01/06/2011 05:43 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
[snip]
What new feature are you after?
Does that feature apply to crypto softraid?
There's the answer. :)
None actually. :-)
I was just being cautious not run in problems with an old softraid
volume and newer systems but the upgrade guide clearly
Wow, that's what I call deep knowledge! Thank you for explaining it, Roberth.
Best,
Ezequiel
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:58 PM, roberth rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:35:32 +0100
Ezequiel Garzsn garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:18 PM, xSAPPYx
I try to use OpenBSD wherever I can and in the firewall I have
installed in a big jewel store
here I have the following problem.
Many websites these days Akamize or do whatever that gives them a
different IP address
everytime you access it.
And consequently pf which does not know a thing about
Well, I changed /etc/mail/aliases:
root: this_us...@mail.levitch.org
Mail arrives now. Also, with smtpd.conf modified:
- comment out loopback:
# listen on lo0
effect is the same.
Anyhow, this was the first time I needed fqdn in aliases file on
localhost.
Darrel
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011
I installed 4.8-release for i386 via install48.iso found on the FTPs.
However, to finish the install I had to disable my onboard ethernet LAN
in BIOS to get past the network setup phase - otherwise the machine
would completely lock up.
This is the first time I've installed OpenBSD on this
30 matches
Mail list logo
