An update...
Feb 16 16:44:38.484106 rule def/(short) [uid 0, pid 0] pass
out on xl2: fie.fue.com.5 172.24.44.89.0: [udp sum ok]
udp 16 (DF) (ttl 43, id 0, len 44, bad cksum a33e! differs by 100)
So for some reason I see a misformed, short packet going *out*
of the firewall, but not
Hi,
after a couple of days of running into dead ends, I would appreciate
some help.
To summarize: For more than 3 years I'm successfully running OpenBSD
(it's now at OPENBSD_4_9/i386, running GENERIC.MP) at the German hoster
Hetzner as my expensive little plaything. They offer native IPv6 for
Additional information I forgot previous writeup: at some point in the
current setup, the kernel complains. I have one additional line in my dmesg
nd6_rtrequest: bad gateway value: re0
Googling this didn't steer me in the right direction. It's also the only
error message I'm getting here.
Hello
I have couple of old ProLiants with bxp/em interfaces with 4.8 stable.
If you provide me more info what to test extactly and what output to send,
I'd gladly help.
BR
Peter
On 13 Mar 2011 03:56, Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 06:29:42PM -0800, Chris
Hiya,
I came across this thought be of interest to developers (I am not
affiliated with the vendor)
Gooze are offering smartcards or OTP tokens for open source developers
for free in return for improvement of support to security devices
If anyone is interested, more details are available at
Hello Moritz,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Moritz Grimm mgmlist...@mrsserver.net wrote:
The IPv6 setup (broken):
Have you tried pinging the local interface first? Does ping ::1 works?
Then does ping fe80:xxx (replace by output of your interface) works?
etc...
The IPv6 network is supposed
Hi,
Have you tried pinging the local interface first? Does ping ::1 works?
Then does ping fe80:xxx (replace by output of your interface) works?
etc...
Ping6ing those two works.
The IPv6 network is supposed to be 2a01:4f8:110:4363::/64, the gateway
is 2a01:4f8:110:4360::1/59. So again
Hi,
Is there a support for these chipsets for OpenBSD 4.8/i386?
As I understand the documentation the ral driver supports
rt2760 (am I right?) but what about rt3060?
Thanks in advance,
Piotr
Hi,
I have here an NFS server which will only serve up read-write exports when they
are on /dev/wd0a. I tried for ages to serve up a path under /vol/tomb (which is
on /dev/wd1b) and clients are told the fs is read-only upon attempting to write.
Serving up from /nports is fine.
/nports -alldirs
RC)solution Centre: Votre compte d'accC)s C C)tC) limitC).
Nous avions restaurC( l'acces C votre compte.
nous avons maintenant besoin que vous confirmez C nouveau Les
informations de votre compte chez caisse-epargne.fr
veuillez suivre les C(tapes suivants :
1:Cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:40:56PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
/dev/wd0a on / type ffs (NFS exported, local)
Wahh. Bad!
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:45:57 +, FRLinux wrote:
Try this: tracepath6 2a01:4f8:110:4360::1
Wrong mailing list.
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I am subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is
tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided
Have you tried ping6 -n ff02::2%re0 ? Does anyone respond? Try using
the respond(ers) as your IPv6 default gateway.
Link local is best for IPv6 gateways for various reasons, if your upstream
isn't picky (unlike he.net tunnels, for example).
Penned by Moritz Grimm on 20110313 6:43.32, we have
- This mail is a HTML mail. Not all elements could be shown in plain text
mode. -
Documento sem tmtulo
Prezado Cliente:
O motivo pelo qual estamos entrando em contato i para alertar que
seu Cartco Chave de Seguranga Real-Santander esta
EXPIRADO
..,
Caso nco efetue o seu recadastramento com
Hi all,
in order to fix a hardware problem with 4.8 release I need to move to
the current or 4.9 kernel.
Having not played around with openbsd's dev trunk before; what is
expected to work/not to work if I just dump in a new bsd kernel and
reboot?
I quite happily run git built linux kernels willy
Expect a system that is deeply and strangely broken, along with accusations of
trolling.
On Mar 13, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
Hi all,
in order to fix a hardware problem with 4.8 release I need to move to
the current or 4.9 kernel.
Having not played around with openbsd's
On 03/13/11 19:13, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
Hi all,
in order to fix a hardware problem with 4.8 release I need to move to
the current or 4.9 kernel.
Having not played around with openbsd's dev trunk before; what is
expected to work/not to work if I just dump in a new bsd kernel and
reboot?
I
in order to fix a hardware problem with 4.8 release I need to move to
the current or 4.9 kernel.
Having not played around with openbsd's dev trunk before; what is
expected to work/not to work if I just dump in a new bsd kernel and
reboot?
I quite happily run git built linux kernels willy
On 14 March 2011 13:53, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net
wrote:
Hi all,
in order to fix a hardware problem with 4.8 release I need to move to
the current or 4.9 kernel.
...
just after 4.8 was released, ral(4) was
I have a program who's output I want to log exclusively to it's own
file.
Which is to say I dont want any of it's output appearing in the system
logs.
Reading the syslog man pages this doesn't seem possible:
If I put
!!myprog
*.* /path/to/logfile
after the initial block (which has
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:07:02 +1300
Paul M l...@no-tek.com wrote:
I have a program who's output I want to log exclusively to it's own
file.
Which is to say I dont want any of it's output appearing in the
system logs.
Reading the syslog man pages this doesn't seem possible:
If I put
21 matches
Mail list logo
