Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't careful about this section.
If i understand i must add defer option to my WAN iface (or i'm wrong i
must add it to my vlan995 iface ?) ?
I will test it this morning, and i return back to misc :)
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network
Nathan Goings wrote:
I purchased an Edimax EW-7128Gn that contains a ralink RT3060 chip and
it's unrecognized.
dmesg:
vendor Ralink, unknown product 0x3060 (class network subclass
miscellaneous, rev 0x00) at pci4 dev 0 function 0 not configured
The documentation says a/g/n but this is a
Thanks Phil. Your advice worked out. It is quite sad that I can't run
parallel compile while building system, but this definitely wont stop me
from using OBSD!
On 7/3/2013 0:50 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:19 PM, jV j...@dodec.lt wrote:
...
then I followed instructions
Hi Marc,
can you please be more specific here ?
Thanks,
On 7/3/2013 7:37 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:50:08PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
These are defined in y.tab.h, which is created by yacc -d
This might have been fixed in -current by the import of the newer
version
Okay, defer is now enabled on pfsync interface (sorry for my last idea,
i haven't the man on me :) ).
It seems the problem isn't resolved.
The transfer starts but blocked at random time.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Networks
http://www.unix-experience.fr
How does your CARP setup looks like. On both machines?
Can you send your ifconfig output?
What is your environment/setup for this 2-node CARP?
How interfaces (ext/int) are connected? What switches do you use?
On 3 jul 2013, at 10:23, Loïc Blot loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote:
Okay, defer
I have a machine that has been serving as NAT gateway and VPN server
(both pptp/poptop and openvpn) since 5.0 without problems.
On 5.2 I switched poptop to npppd compiled from sources and was very
happy with it. With release of 5.3 I added second machine as CARP
failover backup.
In last 10 days
Hello,
no carp is used at this time.
My configuration on each router is simple:
em0 + em3 = trunk0
em1 + em2 = trunk1
4 interco vlan (at this time, only 2 are active, 1 for a BGP neighbor
IPv4, 1 for a BGP neighbor IPv6) on trunk0
vlan 50 + vlan 90 + vlan995 on trunk1
pfsync on vlan 995
--
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:00:02 -0500, Loïc Blot
loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote:
Hello,
no carp is used at this time.
pfsync needs to be used with carp... without it you're just playing
whack-a-mole with your session table.
It's not possible to sync pf table without CARP ?
I must use it in some case, then those case will be fixed but the other
(OSPFd routing) may fail i think ?
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Networks
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:40:08 -0500, Loïc Blot
loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote:
It's not possible to sync pf table without CARP ?
In order to answer that I'll need to understand what you believe the pf
table is.
Sure it syncs, but
node1 has completely different IP addresses than node2(both external and
internal ??), if no CARP.
So storing states from node1, which passes/initiated connection to ftp.fr , on
node2 does not help.
In your case, you'd probably to decide to ever have MASTER-BACKUP or to have
For me pf table is (sorry for the missing precisions) the pf state
stable for stateful operations
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Networks
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 08:22 -0500, Mark Felder a écrit :
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013
Le Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:11:08 -0500,
Mark Felder f...@feld.me a écrit :
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:00:02 -0500, Loïc Blot
loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote:
Hello,
no carp is used at this time.
pfsync needs to be used with carp... without it you're just playing
whack-a-mole with your
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 09:24:54 -0500, Loïc Blot
loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote:
For me pf table is (sorry for the missing precisions) the pf state
stable for stateful operations
First of all, the states of node 1 being synced to node 2 and vice versa
is worthless because they have
I don't understand why they can't be synced because if i have this
scheme:
server 1 - | Router 1 + Router 2 | remote
server 1 contact remote, outgoing by Router 1 and the return traffic
comes from Router 2.
The state may have server 1 port A to remote port B, then the virtual
IP is useless in
States ARE synced.
IPs are not the same on node1 and node2 for external. The you initiated
connection to ftp.fr, you done it via node1 with its external IP. On node2
those packets will be DROPPED as those do not belong to external NIC on node2
(IP)
On 3 jul 2013, at 17:16, Loïc Blot
The connection is not done by my routers themselves but by DMZ servers
behind them !
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Networks
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 17:32 +0200, mxb a écrit :
States ARE synced.
IPs are not the same on
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
Hi folks,
Anyone having any experience with putting an softraid CRYPTO partition
on top of a softraid RAID 1? In terms of performance?
I'd like to build a file server that favors redundancy, availability and
privacy over performance. The latter
hello florenz!
u are wright! i was a wrong and try to defend myself by answering back but i
check again to what jash was saying and then bang he was Wright, Damm even
worse, but ok i learn the lesson, usually y try to internet and then on
archives but this time i got confused on supports from 32
Thanks for your response!
On 7/3/2013 1:07 AM, Remco wrote:
AFAIK this is step one. Assuming you added the PCI IDs correctly, the driver's
attach function should run. However, to the best of my understanding, you
chose a more or less random attach function for your unsupported device.
My guess
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote:
On 07/02/2013 11:44 AM, noah pugsley wrote:
More wrong? Maybe so. My point was that both are and either way it's
inconsistent.
not anymore. new text, as of last night:
Processors
All CPUs compatible with the Intel 80486 or better, with
On 03.07.2013. 19:15, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Is there floating-point hardware for 486 or higher that isn't
Intel-compatible?
This text seems superfluous.
I remember some Weitek floating-point coprocessors from those times - I suppose
they were not x87 compatible?
On 07/03/2013 01:15 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote:
On 07/02/2013 11:44 AM, noah pugsley wrote:
More wrong? Maybe so. My point was that both are and either way it's
inconsistent.
not anymore. new text, as of last night:
Processors
All CPUs
On 07/03/13 05:45, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
I made a new build of current and the problem with tar performance seems
to be resolved now.
before:
# time tar -xzpf /usr/releasedir/comp53.tgz
3m17.81s real 0m2.14s user 0m2.22s system
# time tar -xzpf /usr/releasedir/base53.tgz
Zeljko Jovanovic zelj...@tesla.rcub.bg.ac.rs wrote:
Is there floating-point hardware for 486 or higher that isn't
Intel-compatible?
This text seems superfluous.
I remember some Weitek floating-point coprocessors from those times - I
suppose
they were not x87 compatible?
They
an unlikely combination, but a 486sx with a Weitek 4167 would qualify.
And OpenBSD would not run on it, because it only expects an
x87-compatible FPU on such a system.
Plus... I would not be surprised if some day, someone (probably
Chinese/Taiwanese/Indian) did an embedded x86 compatible-ish
In my ~/.Xresources, I specify XTerm*locale:ISO8859-2
to get my xterm to display the chars of the Czech language,
and in my ~/.xinitrc, I toggle -layout us,cz via setxkbmap
to be able to type the Czech chars.
(See full ~/.Xresources and ~/.xinitrc at bottom.)
My problem is that _sometimes_ I
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
I understand that the support for the XTerm*locale: ISO8859-2 setting
is achieved by using luit(1). If I comment the locale setting out
(and so don't launch luit and lose the locale support),
these problems disappear.
This leads me to suspect luit, or the way
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:33:51AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
[...snip...] FWIW one of my servers (handles mail, etc) is a Sun Fire V210
(sparc64) machine with 2x1GHz CPU, 2GB RAM and a pair of SCSI drives - it
runs perfectly well in a similar CRYPTO on RAID 1 configuration. That said,
you'd
On 2 July 2013 14:39, Mikhail Krutov n...@takino.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:43:28AM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
If so, I'd like to know if you are running a recent 5.3-current. Mail me
off list so we don't pollute misc@.
Steve,
My opinion (if it costs anything) is that this info
About a month ago, I followed up on tech@ that some fuse support had
been merged into the kernel, but disable by default.
(By the way, congrats and thanks to the devs for that! :D)
I'm wondering if there's any timeframe for this getting enabled by default
- I'd love to have fuse support, but I
On 2013-07-02 18:53, Nick Holland wrote:
On 07/02/13 17:07, Jean-Francois Simon wrote:
Le 20/05/2013 13:46, Nick Holland a écrit :
On 05/20/13 00:52, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
...
3) The man pages report RAID5 as experimental. I'm curious, why
is this so? Is it just not-very-thoroughly
About a month ago, I followed up on tech@ that some fuse support had
been merged into the kernel, but disable by default.
(By the way, congrats and thanks to the devs for that! :D)
I'm wondering if there's any timeframe for this getting enabled by default
- I'd love to have fuse support,
Theo,
Don't you just love it when folks ask questions they already know the answers
to?
Still, FUSE is a wonderful idea. It certainly would make OpenBSD more versatile
(and even allow it to wend its way further into both the user and corporate
market segments.
anyway, hope you are having a
Still, FUSE is a wonderful idea. It certainly would make OpenBSD
more versatile (and even allow it to wend its way further into both
the user and corporate market segments.
So we should enable it right now, today, when it is brand new code?
Skip the testing period? Start from go, and
Did I say that it had to be run today? Funny, I only remember remarking that
its a wonderful idea.
As for my being an idiot, the jury is still out on that one. :) I know that
this is your way to motivate others into doing for themselves. There are better
ways to do this, but you are you and I
Why do we need FUSE anyway?
O.D.
On 4. juli 2013 at 2:10 AM, eric oyen eric.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Did I say that it had to be run today? Funny, I only remember
remarking that its a wonderful idea.
As for my being an idiot, the jury is still out on that one. :) I
know that this is your way to
On 03/07/13 11:07 PM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
Why do we need FUSE anyway?
To be able to utilize FUSE based filesystems.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On Jul 3, 2013, at 20:23, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 03/07/13 11:07 PM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
Why do we need FUSE anyway?
To be able to utilize FUSE based filesystems.
Fuse is a terrible hack.
But, a useful one that solves all kinds of problems.
Sent form my iFoe.
My first dumb question since I've been back and there will probably be
plenty more.
With the Ricoh 5U823 does sdhc only recognize SD cards on boot?
OpenBSD 5.3 (GENERIC.MP) #58: Tue Mar 12 18:43:53 MDT 2013
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R)
41 matches
Mail list logo
