On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:16 PM, John Rogers microspar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not an expert on this but my theory is that the problem is not
that the CPU is running too fast but rather that it is running in a
high power state, presumably C0. Do you know if apmd adjusts the
c-state?
C0 is
On 2014-01-12, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I am having essentially the same problem as here:
http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/res-init-and-0-0-0-0-td234246.html
Specifically it is GNUMail and Pantomime which do not resolve correctly.
I reduced myself to almost
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Matt Carlson wrote:
Yasuoka,
I tried that just now and it doesn't seem to make a difference.
Thanks,
At risk of replying off-topic and out of date, I'll ask the question anyway.
Have you considered using OpenVPN, as there are working clients for
Hi Stuart,
thanks for the hint, I made one further step.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
You must use libbind's headers, too: -I/usr/local/include/libbind
Just for the record, it is not -I/usr/local/include/libbind but
-I/usr/local/include/bind
This works fine with my example test program, but
I'm not willing to part with any of my Vaxstations since I'm actively using
them, but I'm willing to donate one of my VAX 4000 model 300s that are
sitting in my basement right now. They have DSSI disks but I think one of
them has a SCSI card that I'll also part with.
They are the size of a
Actually, I just spoke to one of my co-workers... he is an OpenBSD guy and
he knows Theo and the location of the build hardware, so I've lined up
someone to move it to its location, I've just got to wipe VAX/VMS from it
and install the recent build of OpenBSD.
--
Thomas Dzubin
Tor,
I've considered it and would prefer to get the native OpenBSD VPN working. That
being said, I may look into OpenVPN if I can't get this to work.
Thanks,
Matt
On Jan 13, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Tor Houghton t...@bogus.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Matt Carlson wrote:
Thanks for the offer, but I really cannot house a 4000/300. Quite
simply, that is too large.
OK... sorry
The only other machine that I could offer is a Vaxstation 3100 m30, but it
doesn't even run VMS very well and probably would not be a very good build
machine.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
Thanks for the offer, but I really cannot
I have recently inherited a set of high-spec machines that I intend to
use for OpenBSD. I am planning on using these machines for DNS, HTTP,
mail, LDAP, netboot, build system for following -stable, etc. So my
question is, is it recommended to load all these
services on a single instance
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Christopher Ahrens wrote:
I have recently inherited a set of high-spec machines that I intend to
use for OpenBSD. I am planning on using these machines for DNS, HTTP,
mail, LDAP, netboot, build system for following -stable, etc. So my
question is, is it recommended to
previously on this list Hugo Pompougnac contributed:
As a
student, I'm discovering OpenBSD. I'm trying to automount USB keys with
hotplug,
but it's quite difficult. That's why I ask to you.
Hi,
This mounts FFS, ext2fs, NTFS, MSDOS but not cd at the moment and falls
back to ro mode giving a
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Christopher Ahrens wrote:
I have recently inherited a set of high-spec machines that I intend to
use for OpenBSD. I am planning on using these machines for DNS, HTTP,
mail, LDAP, netboot, build system for following -stable, etc. So my
question is, is
I just posted the original message to the comp.sys.dec list server.
Hopefully someone there will have an extra system or 2 to donate.
I've tried building (samba) on my MicroVAX 3100-40, but it is
painfully-painfully slow.
Do we have to have a VAX system to do builds on, or would it be possible
What happened to the original system? Completely fried, or is it fixable
(power supply, RAM, ...)?
On 1/13/2014 10:06 AM, Thomas wrote:
Actually, I just spoke to one of my co-workers... he is an OpenBSD guy and
he knows Theo and the location of the build hardware, so I've lined up
someone to
I just posted the original message to the comp.sys.dec list server.
Hopefully someone there will have an extra system or 2 to donate.
Thank you for petitioning on our behalf.
I've tried building (samba) on my MicroVAX 3100-40, but it is
painfully-painfully slow.
The smaller machines are
What happened to the original system? Completely fried, or is it fixable
(power supply, RAM, ...)?
Early of last year, a 4000/96 completely died.
Recently, another 4000/96 developed a bad row of bits in the cache
controller.
Christopher Ahrens wrote:
Wish I could split everything off to physical, but all I have for space for is a mini-rack that fits under my desk in
my apartment
Sounds like you have answered your own question!
--
Jack Woehr # We commonly say we have no time when,
Box 51, Golden CO
Jack Woehr wrote:
Christopher Ahrens wrote:
Wish I could split everything off to physical, but all I have for
space for is a mini-rack that fits under my desk in my apartment
Sounds like you have answered your own question!
What I meant by bare-metal was if I should run a bunch of
On 1/13/2014 9:11 PM, Christopher Ahrens wrote:
Jack Woehr wrote:
Christopher Ahrens wrote:
Wish I could split everything off to physical, but all I have for
space for is a mini-rack that fits under my desk in my apartment
Sounds like you have answered your own question!
What I meant by
Em 13-01-2014 18:02, Matthew P. Carlson escreveu:
Tor,
I've considered it and would prefer to get the native OpenBSD VPN working.
That being said, I may look into OpenVPN if I can't get this to work.
Thanks,
Matt
Hi,
I've used the OpenBSD native vpn, both with L2TP/IPSec and with
Em 14-01-2014 01:11, Christopher Ahrens escreveu:
What I meant by bare-metal was if I should run a bunch of services on
the same installation of OpenBSD.
I've run in the same physical space issue with my company servers and
didn't think twice to use virtualization. But, as pointed by others,
Matthew Weigel wrote:
On 1/13/2014 9:11 PM, Christopher Ahrens wrote:
Jack Woehr wrote:
Christopher Ahrens wrote:
Wish I could split everything off to physical, but all I have for
space for is a mini-rack that fits under my desk in my apartment
Sounds like you have answered your own
I personally wouldn't advise using a single bare-metal machine just for
dhcp, a separate one for dns, a separate one for sendmail etc. Seems like a
huge waste of resources to me. My opinion is that you would fare better, as
was suggested earlier, to use some of the other bare-metal machines for
24 matches
Mail list logo
