Den 07-08-2014 06:52, Indunil Jayasooriya skrev:
Dear OpenBSD users,
We have a new hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 server with 2 x 1TB Hard
disks. When we are going to install Open BSD 5.5 64 bit, Openbsd can't
detect These 2 Hard disks ( 2 x 1 TB)
These are 2 hard disks of 7.2 K SATA 1 TB
It asks
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 00:31:14 +0200, Theo Buehler t...@math.ethz.ch
wrote:
The version numbers of less and perl in 56.html are incorrect.
While there, nsd's version is wrong too:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=139481293201958w=2
Index: 56.html
See if you can switch it to a standard AHCI/SATA mode in the bios.
I switched to AHCI/SATA mode in BIOS. OpenBSD 5.5 64 bit Detected
BOTH HARD DISKS. So I installed it.
I now have 2 TB. On first disk, I partitioned /, swap , /usr and /var
on the other 1 TB hard disk, I just
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya
induni...@gmail.com wrote:
See if you can switch it to a standard AHCI/SATA mode in the bios.
I switched to AHCI/SATA mode in BIOS. OpenBSD 5.5 64 bit Detected
BOTH HARD DISKS. So I installed it.
I now have 2 TB. On first
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:08:02PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
We got this server with 2 x 1 TB hard disks. Because we want a mirrored
Hard drive with 1 TB. But We got it WITHOUT getting it mirrored.
We can tell the Hardware vendor to mirror this 2 hard disks.
My question is after
Hi!
There is a litte yet confusing typo in FAQ section 14.21.5 on softraid
crypto:
Setting the volume up refers to '/dev/sd0m' while unlocking this
volume is described with reference to '/dev/sd1m'. Most likely this typo
sneaked in as in this example the volume attaches as 'sd1'...
(Even though
Hello Stuart,
Wednesday, August 6, 2014, 8:01:21 AM, you wrote:
SH On 2014-08-05, David Dahlberg david.dahlb...@fkie.fraunhofer.de wrote:
I do not know enough of Cisco to be able to tell you whether or not
one may cluster their routers/VPN gateways. But you have multiple
options to emulate
Try to change the harddrive settings in BIOS.
They are probably defaulting to raid-mode, which doesn't work under
OpenBSD.
i.e - does NOT this server's Hardware Raid (Mirror) work under
OpenBSD? Will I have to go with Software RAID?
--
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Søren
Hi all,
You mean the hardware raid (card bios) seams to be a fake-raid ?
So OS doesn't find the devices ?
If so just not use the fake-raid, disable it, and use soft-raid from BSD.
Therfore I can't beleive HP proliant series use a fake-raid
Mine is a quite recent model DL380G5 but has a real
* Indunil Jayasooriya induni...@gmail.com [2014-08-07 15:23]:
Try to change the harddrive settings in BIOS.
They are probably defaulting to raid-mode, which doesn't work under
OpenBSD.
i.e - does NOT this server's Hardware Raid (Mirror) work under
OpenBSD? Will I have to go with
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, mxb wrote:
Probably, but you can play with ipsec-config and send your results over here.
On 24 jul 2014, at 13:23, Stefan Krueger stadtki...@gmx.de wrote:
In mailing.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
the public_ip in your ipsec.conf should be the external ip of your
Hi
Le 06/08/2014 15:15, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
On 2014-08-04, Christophe t...@stuxnet.org wrote:
Second question :
I used to write route-to and reply-to rules in pf.conf in a static context.
As far as I've seen, there are modifiers on interface specifications
like :network or :peer. But
2014-08-05 9:17 GMT-03:00 Rafael Zalamena rzalam...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Alucard wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of VPLS/PWE3 support on Openbsd right now ?
I have been researching a bit but cannot find a definitive answer.
There is several mentions of work on
On 08/07/14 05:13, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi!
There is a litte yet confusing typo in FAQ section 14.21.5 on softraid
crypto:
Setting the volume up refers to '/dev/sd0m' while unlocking this
volume is described with reference to '/dev/sd1m'. Most likely this typo
sneaked in as in this
Hi,
While reading on login.conf(5), can't find tc capability mentions.
But, examples usage are demonstrated in /etc/login.conf. After some
search and readings, found out that it has a few paragraph explaining in
getcap(3):
A special capability, tc= name, is used to indicate that the record
If so just not use the fake-raid, disable it, and use soft-raid from BSD.
If used soft-raid from BSD, does it consume more RAM or processing
functions etc?
I will have to use this server for PF , OpenVPN , Squid, Postfix or
Sendmail and Apache etc..
Therfore I can't beleive HP
16 matches
Mail list logo
