On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk:
I still don't see the benefit though but do see added complexity or
more code to audit.
Reducing DDOS against a visible SSH service maybe? Reduce password
Alessandro DE LAURENZIS just22.adl at gmail.com writes:
(line-wrapped because of GMane)
#define SUDOCMD -fn 7x14 -geometry 60x4 -e sudo su -c 'nohup \
xfe /dev/null sleep 1'
^^
Note that this will not work on OpenBSD anyway; even mksh, which
does implement this bashism, will not parse
2014-10-17 10:24 GMT+02:00 Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
It's a good thing that traffic analysis isn't a thing, then. Otherwise
they'd be able to check
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
2014-10-17 10:24 GMT+02:00 Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
It's a good thing that
From: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org
Date: Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: sudo bad practice or inconsistency?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Alessandro DE LAURENZIS just22.adl at gmail.com writes:
(line-wrapped because of GMane)
#define SUDOCMD -fn 7x14 -geometry 60x4 -e sudo su
Hi folks,
The manpage for relayd.conf has this basic construct in it a couple of times :
table service { 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.2.3 }
table fallback disable { 10.1.5.1 retry 2 }
redirect www {
listen on www.example.com port 80
Hallo,
Undefined behavior is a concept known especially in the C and C++
languages which means that the semantics of certain operations is
undefined and the compiler presumes that such operations never happen.
For instance, using non-static variable before it has been initialized
is undefined.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk:
The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
It's a good thing
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian Grant ian.a.n.gr...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk:
The
All,
Installed 5.6-current last night and saw that the new httpd daemon will be
using the config file /etc/httpd.conf (which looks like it needs to be
created by hand, fine).
At the risk of sounding like a knucklehead, are there good examples of how
to hook php to the new daemon? (Or for that
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:45:41AM -0700, Kevin wrote:
All,
Installed 5.6-current last night and saw that the new httpd daemon will be
using the config file /etc/httpd.conf (which looks like it needs to be
created by hand, fine).
At the risk of sounding like a knucklehead, are there good
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Zé Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
Installed 5.6-current last night and saw that the new httpd daemon will
be
using the config file /etc/httpd.conf (which looks like it needs to be
created by hand, fine).
At the risk of sounding like a knucklehead, are
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 05:51:08AM -0600, David Coppa wrote:
From: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org
Date: Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: sudo bad practice or inconsistency?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Alessandro DE LAURENZIS just22.adl at gmail.com writes:
(line-wrapped
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:13:55PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk:
The impossibility to scan
2014-10-17 20:49 GMT+02:00 Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com:
Well, if, as Herr Schroeder seems to be implying, this is used to
avoid port scans, I'd look for traffic to/from address:port which
don't show up on scans.
That's certainly possible but more expensive than find all ssh servers.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if, as Herr Schroeder seems to be implying, this is used to
avoid port scans, I'd look for traffic to/from address:port which
don't show up on scans.
That's why I want to hide it behind an ordinary service.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:59:26PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if, as Herr Schroeder seems to be implying, this is used to
avoid port scans, I'd look for traffic to/from address:port which
don't show up on scans.
I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
with hexdump like so: ./memtest [pid] | hexdump -C | less
Sometimes I get a bit
I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
with hexdump like so: ./memtest [pid] | hexdump -C | less
Sometimes I get a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Bob Beck b...@openbsd.org wrote:
We have released LibreSSL 2.1.1- which should be arriving in the
LIbreSSL directory of an OpenBSD mirror near you very soon.
If I clone the GitHub repo from Bolivia, do I have to cut my eyeballs
out or stand guilty of
On Fri 17/10 17:39, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
As I read the man page for su it is the target's login shell that is
invoked, and it need not always be /bin/sh - it can be changed.
Therefore I suspect that you want -s /bin/sh between su and root.
I'm confused:
just22@poseidon:[~] sudo su -s
On 10/17/14 22:38, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
with hexdump like so: ./memtest
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Peter J. Philipp p...@centroid.eu wrote:
I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
23 matches
Mail list logo
