Quoting worik worik.stan...@gmail.com:
In a fresh(ish) OpenBSD installation I note .cshrc and .profile in /.
Why?
bin:*:3:7:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:29:59AM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
On Fri 17/10 17:39, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
As I read the man page for su it is the target's login shell that is
invoked, and it need not always be /bin/sh - it can be changed.
Therefore I suspect that you want -s
On 20-10-2014 01:53, Nicolas Haller wrote:
I have a strange issue while trying to reconfigure my Soekris after
the CompactFlash died.
Here the picture. I have a dedicated FreeBSD server linked with my
Soekris acting as my home gateway(which was running OpenBSD 4.0, and
now running OpenBSD
* Ian Grant ian.a.n.gr...@googlemail.com [2014-10-20 01:02]:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
I believe that
OpenBSD does that. But don't expect them to add
a security through obscurity layer to their kernel because I
guess they wont.
Well, they don't have a choice,
On 2014-10-20 11:31, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
On 20-10-2014 01:53, Nicolas Haller wrote:
I have a strange issue while trying to reconfigure my Soekris after
the CompactFlash died.
Here the picture. I have a dedicated FreeBSD server linked with my
Soekris acting as my home gateway(which was
On 20/10/14 06:31 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
On 20-10-2014 01:53, Nicolas Haller wrote:
I have a strange issue while trying to reconfigure my Soekris after
the CompactFlash died.
Here the picture. I have a dedicated FreeBSD server linked with my
Soekris acting as my home gateway(which was
On 20/10/14 07:08 AM, Louis Bailleul wrote:
I am using openvpn (with tun interfaces) and quagga to do something
similar between two linux boxes .
I experienced that exact issue a while back and managed to solve it by
accident while upgrading openvpn ...
I am currently using OpenVPN 2.2.1
On 20-10-2014 09:51, Nicolas Haller wrote:
Sure I can. Did you see any change fitting with my issue? I took a
look on the changelog but I didn't find anything relevant.
I think I'll try to reproduce the issue on two 5.5 OpenBSD VMs to rule
out (or not) FreeBSD and with the last snapshot to see
On 20-10-2014 09:08, Louis Bailleul wrote:
I am using openvpn (with tun interfaces) and quagga to do something
similar between two linux boxes .
I experienced that exact issue a while back and managed to solve it by
accident while upgrading openvpn ...
I am currently using OpenVPN 2.2.1
Hi!
I have a Thinkpad X200 where the fan controlling does not seem to be
working as intended. It is constantly spinning at 3300-3400 RPM
according to 'sysctl hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.fan0', even under heavy
load (100% usage on both cores) and no matter if the cpu temperature is
35 or 55 degrees
On 19-10-2014 21:01, Ian Grant wrote:
On the contrary: it_will_ make it impossible for people to know what
_we_ are doing. This is not one system I'm talking about: it's
countless independent VPNs. No one person in the world will ever know
what_we_ are doing.
Except perhaps for the nations
On 2014-10-20 13:08, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
On 20-10-2014 09:08, Louis Bailleul wrote:
I am using openvpn (with tun interfaces) and quagga to do something
similar between two linux boxes .
I experienced that exact issue a while back and managed to solve it by
accident while upgrading
On 20-10-2014 11:02, Louis Bailleul wrote:
Just to be clear, I did not say that the solution was to upgrade or
anything else.
To quote you: I experienced that exact issue a while back and managed
to solve it by accident while upgrading openvpn ...
But I think that asking someone to check the
HI there!
As my system (amd64-current) still looses sometimes the routes (?) I am
checking the logs to investigate before asking for help. Doing so I run
tail -f /var/log/messages in a xterm.
I just noticed the following error:
~~~
Oct 20 13:31:13 idefix /bsd: error:
I will spare you all the backstory but I found that tftp could not download
files over 32 mb by default from tftpd. I know you can pass blocksize to tftpd
to handle much larger files but I was originally working with a client where
this wasn't possible. Tftp protocol has 2 bytes for block number
Hi there!
I use a Lenovo T60 with amd64-5.6-current / #452 from Oct. 20th.
Looking at what 'tcpdump -nettti pflog0 inbound and action block'
reports I noticed the following:
~
~ $ sudo tcpdump -nettti pflog0 inbound and action block
tcpdump: WARNING: snaplen raised
On 2014-10-20 13:16, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
Still investigating some strange behaviour I run
~ $ sudo systat states
Scrolling some pages to the right I get some information related to
'devices' (I reformatted the page showing the last column underneath
the
first columns for better
Am 10/20/14 um 19:36 schrieb Josh Grosse:
On 2014-10-20 13:16, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
Still investigating some strange behaviour I run
~ $ sudo systat states
Scrolling some pages to the right I get some information related to
'devices' (I reformatted the page showing the last
Hello. I was wondering if there was any new information about the status
of stacked softraid for the root partition? I am particularly interested
in using RAID1C for root partitions.
I searched and the last message I could find regarding the subject was
from over a year ago and I think the
On the contrary: it_will_ make it impossible for people to know what
_we_ are doing. This is not one system I'm talking about: it's
countless independent VPNs. No one person in the world will ever know
what_we_ are doing.
'countless independent VPNs' + 'a one-time pre-shared key' = big
Hi,
I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
published with the algorithm type:
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
A couple of other popular non-OpenBSD sites omit the bit length:
16:27:ac:a5:76:28:2d:36:63:1b:56:4d:eb:df:a6:48 (RSA)
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 14:12, John Merriam wrote:
Hello. I was wondering if there was any new information about the status
of stacked softraid for the root partition? I am particularly interested
in using RAID1C for root partitions.
I searched and the last message I could find regarding
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=141313780003055w=2
Hi list,
I'm running OpenBSD-5.5-amd64. Today, I patched the 012_openssl.patch,
built and installed the new version, but now, I'm not able to establish
secure connections. For example via
# https
$ wget -O /dev/null https://bitfactory.ws/test.txt
$ curl curl https://google.com
# smtps
On 2014-10-20, Craig R. Skinner skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
published with the algorithm type:
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
That seems useless.
The bit length doesn't appear in the known_hosts file.
Implicitly it
Hello.
I just decided to give OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) a go in my netbook,
everything is working flawlessly so far, except for the Wireless
Network. I did install rsu-firmware which did nothing.
My netbook has a Realtek RTL8192SE wireless chip, which I can't get to
work with OpenBSD. When running
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Dylan Socolobsky dsocolob...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I just decided to give OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) a go in my netbook,
everything is working flawlessly so far, except for the Wireless
Network. I did install rsu-firmware which did nothing.
My netbook has a
On 20 October 2014 14:13, Worik Stanton worik.stan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes all traffic of a country can be analysed, fairly close to real time.
With some basic statistics, smart sampling and a dedicated team
crafting cleaver algorithms... That is what those big budgets are for!
Can throw in
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:54:31PM -0300, Dylan Socolobsky wrote:
What can I do? Is the card not supported at all? Is it just bad
mapping maybe?
Not supported. Write a driver for it or find a card that works.
Here is my diff to change the data type of the block variable so tftp can
handle tftpd block rollover when transferring large files.
May not be that useful but I'm just using something trivial (pun intended) to
learn the procedure.
J
From: Justin Mayes
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:26 AM
To:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:18 PM, john slee indig...@oldcorollas.org wrote:
On 20 October 2014 14:13, Worik Stanton worik.stan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes all traffic of a country can be analysed, fairly close to real time.
With some basic statistics, smart sampling and a dedicated team
crafting
- Original Message -
| I will spare you all the backstory but I found that tftp could not download
| files over 32 mb by default from tftpd. I know you can pass blocksize to
| tftpd
| to handle much larger files but I was originally working with a client where
| this wasn't possible. Tftp
current.html has no instructions to remove the _lkm group yet.
Index: www/faq/current.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/current.html,v
retrieving revision 1.562
diff -u -p -r1.562 current.html
--- www/faq/current.html19 Oct
On 20-10-2014 20:46, Ian Grant wrote:
There's analysis, and there's analysis. None of this is particularly
interesting without knowledge of what depth of analysis was being
done.
Yes it is. Because filters can be made to alert you of odd traffic. And
certainly a tcp syn to an http port which
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19-10-2014 21:01, Ian Grant wrote:
On the contrary: it _will_ make it impossible for people to know what
_we_ are doing. This is not one system I'm talking about: it's
countless independent VPNs. No one person
On 20-10-2014 21:52, Ian Grant wrote:
How else can one protect a system from DoS attacks, other than by
concealing it some way? And what is cryptography if it's not
concealing the meaning of a communication in some way?
Oh my. DoS can be mitigated. You could never protect a system. Even if
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20-10-2014 21:52, Ian Grant wrote:
How else can one protect a system from DoS attacks, other than by
concealing it some way? And what is cryptography if it's not
concealing the meaning of a communication in
You are off-topic for this mailing list. Please go discuss it
elsewhere.
I could. My original problem was with cisco rommon tftpdnld command as client
failing talking to tftpd. I just notice the tftp client problem while testing
locally. After this I intend to go back and make tftpd work with whatever cisco
client is doing. Since that’s a two byte field in the rfc
On 10/20/2014 4:42 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
Short answer: It doesn't work yet, and no idea when it will work.
Thanks for the replies. I will keep my eye out as to what is brewing.
If I find the time maybe I'll read the code and see what needs doing
with respect to RAID1C for root.
For now
On 20-10-2014 19:37, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 2014-10-20, Craig R. Skinner skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
published with the algorithm type:
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
That seems useless.
That's not useless. SSHFP
Ok, the problem is fixed now.
I think it was solved by rebuilding/-installing the crypto library.
Sorry for the disturbance.
// Daniel
On 20.10.2014 23:31, Daniel Pajonzeck wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running OpenBSD-5.5-amd64. Today, I patched the 012_openssl.patch,
built and installed the new
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:54:31PM -0300, Dylan Socolobsky wrote:
What can I do? Is the card not supported at all? Is it just bad
mapping maybe?
Not supported. Write a driver for it or find a card that works.
Also,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw., for another guy's question (that I can't seem to google), in this:
6553 avail kvaslots
does that mean Kernel Virtual Address space SLOTS (whatever slots mean in
this context)? Or does it stand for Kernel Virtual Address
On 10/19/14, 4:36 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I am using stack ldapd on the AMD 5.5 release to manage about 100 users
in our distributed UNIX environment. I have noticed the following log
message for three users
LDAPD indexed key [uid=somebody,ou=users,] doesn't exist!
There is nothing at
Hello @misc.
Just for the record (having in mind that 5.6 its almost here !!!), im using
5.5 Release and X was hunged for a while, but get restored.
Here goes dmesg
OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #315: Wed Mar 5 09:37:46 MST 2014
46 matches
Mail list logo
