Re: usb wifi wpa2 enterprise

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:21 AM Shaun Reiger [srei...@sprmail.net] wrote: > Hi I'm trying to find out if obsd supports any usb wifi > adapters that can connect to a wpa2 enterprise network. > I have read through a couple driver man pages urtwn, iwn, > rsu..etc but can't determine if the

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

Could help some people like me who have an asus t100 which only accept UEFI boot. (scarry) -Message d'origine- De : owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] De la part de Chris Cappuccio Envoyé : vendredi 4 septembre 2015 20:23 À : Gerald Hanuer

Re: usb wifi wpa2 enterprise

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:06:28AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > The bigger challenge is accurately identifying a chipset before purchase, > but they're pretty cheap so it isn't usually a big hardship if a particular > device doesn't work. And it's never a bad idea to offer unsupported devices

Re: issue with pf syntax parser

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Joseph A Borg wrote: > this is all very fascinating. Is it possible to contemplate a pre-filter that > chomps out trailing whitespace and comments? Would this overly complicate the > parsing process and introduce security issues? Nah... you'll loose

Re: pf vs mp

On 2015-09-02, Dot Yet wrote: > Any idea if running an ipsec vpn or openvpn on the same machine will > benefit from the second core? working remotely over VPN is quite common > these days. so all the extra juice may help encryption etc. is it so? Using a processor that

OpenBSD octeon on DSR-1000n

I have a Dlink DSR-1000N and want to install OpenBSD on it. I saw the DSR-500 as a supported device on the octeon list and was hoping the 1000n would be as well. I didn't get very far - "Error allocating memory for elf image!" when booting the kernel. Anyone knows if the 1000n is being worked

Re: Another working USB WiFi adapter:

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:52:19PM -0300, Henrique Lengler wrote: > It has been difficult to me to figure out what causes this error, and > try to reproduce it, it looks totally random, some days I get a lot of > timeouts, others I get no one. A "device timeout" means that an outgoing packet

Re: usb wifi wpa2 enterprise

On 2015-09-05, Shaun Reiger wrote: > Hi I'm trying to find out if obsd supports any usb wifi adapters that can > connect to a wpa2 enterprise network. I have read through a couple driver > man pages urtwn, iwn, rsu..etc but can't determine if the adapters listed > will

Re: spamassasin large CPU usage on new snapshot and a huge bayes_toks file not reported in df

On 2015-09-04, Adam Wolk wrote: > It's quite possible that Bayesian filtering started working for me only > since this snapshot. I would appreciate it if you could check the size > of your bayes_toks db & some info on general growth per email (seems to > be around 30-60M on

Re: dmesg Intel NUC NUC5CPYH

Op 04-09-15 om 21:06 schreef Tim Kuijsten: Op 04-09-15 om 21:01 schreef Ted Unangst: Tim Kuijsten wrote: tl;dr no network, dmesg for 5.7 release, 5.8 current mp and sp included. With 5.7 release a dhcp response is received, but no other addresses than the one that is assigned to the machine

Re: usb wifi wpa2 enterprise

Thanks for the tips I will have to try these out when I'm back at University next week. I noticed that in undeadly it didn't mention anything about the certificates is that just added in the wpa_supplicant.conf script. like this ca_cert="/path/to/downloaded/cert" Thanks On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at

Re: Spamd TLS and exchange

> except as ip disconnected after 19 seconds oops 3 seconds... I have -s 3 spamd flag Anyone else receiving from microsoft, maybe it's a configuration combination such as a timeout only applied to TLS by microsoft but I would have thought the same TCP would just be encapsulated and behave exactly

Re: issue with pf syntax parser

On 2015-09-04 14:30, Joseph A Borg wrote: > I have something like this in pf.conf: > > services = "{ > ssh, > \ >

top(1), ps(1): per-process CPU time accounting wrong?

On -current amd64 (GENERIC and GENERIC.MP), per-process CPU time accounting seems wrong to me, judging from watching top(1) and ps(1) while compiling stuff. The system is under load, building an OpenBSD release, but top(1) and ps(1) look like there's not much going on: Most of the time, top(1)

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:22:48AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Since the purpose of Secure Boot provide little to no benefit to users > (in fact quite the opposite), the question becomes why? > For paranoid softraid crypto users who are concerned about a modified

Re: top(1), ps(1): per-process CPU time accounting wrong?

Timo Buhrmester wrote: > On -current amd64 (GENERIC and GENERIC.MP), per-process CPU time > accounting seems wrong to me, judging from watching top(1) and ps(1) > while compiling stuff. > > The system is under load, building an OpenBSD release, but top(1) and > ps(1) look like there's not much

httpd

Swapped over from Apache to httpd recently. Nice simple, easy to set-up httpd.conf file. The system works very well with our virtual static sites. Thanks Developers :)