Re: Sun Fire T2000 available

On 05.04.2016 06:19, Lukas Kaminski wrote: Hello List(s), If someone needs a T2000, it's available for free in Duisburg, Germany. I don't have time for checking the hardware, i think there are minor issues with the fans, but it should be functional. No HDDs included. We have some Fire X4200

Re: Sun Fire T2000 available

Would you be willing to ship to the UK? On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Lukas Kaminski wrote: > Hello List(s), > > If someone needs a T2000, it's available for free in Duisburg, Germany. > > I don't have time for checking the hardware, i think there are minor >

Re: sendmail mx question

> so the real smtp has the lower number but higher priority but like I said my > sendmail always ends up with shit.example.not.nz. What does "sendmail always ends up with shit.example.not.nz." mean? Of course sendmail tries the secondary MX after trying the main MX. Still no real

Re: sendmail mx question

Hi Markus, On 2016-04-05 Tue 16:39 PM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: > > no the real setup is the other way arround > 5 smtp.example.not.nz. # <<--- real server 10 shit.example.not.nz. # <<--- always defering server Their setup is fine then, a classic highlisting arrangement. > > so the real smtp

Sun Fire T2000 available

Hello List(s), If someone needs a T2000, it's available for free in Duisburg, Germany. I don't have time for checking the hardware, i think there are minor issues with the fans, but it should be functional. No HDDs included. We have some Fire X4200 and Fire X4100, too. I think they share

Re: sendmail mx question

hi there, no the real setup is the other way arround 1 shit.example.not.nz. 10 # <<--- always defering server 2 smtp.example.not.nz. 5 # <<--- real server so the real smtp has the lower number but higher priority but like I said my sendmail always ends up with shit.example.not.nz.

Re: sendmail mx question

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016, Craig Skinner wrote: > 1 shit.example.not.nz. # <<--- always defering server > 2 smtp.example.not.nz. # <<--- real server > Your server connects to 'shit.example.not.nz', which defers the mail, > telling your server to try again later. So,. your server tries again >

Re: sendmail mx question

Hi Markus, On 2016-04-05 Tue 14:22 PM |, Markus Rosjat wrote: > > yeah my server does retries but always ends up on the mailserver with the > lower priority :( > That is the correct behaviour. Without the domain name, I'm guessing with English words what you mean;- Pretending their broken

Re: Crash after updating to today's snapshot

Working again as expected with todays snap. For posterity the logs provided were from a t430s not an x230. On 4/2/16, Luke Tidd wrote: > Thanks for the info everyone. I was going to try one more snap before > filing a bug but I can do that next time if it's appropriate. >

Re: sendmail mx question

Hi peter, yeah my server does retries but always ends up on the mailserver with the lower priority :( Am 05.04.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Peter N. M. Hansteen: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/05/16 11:55, Markus Rosjat wrote: I have a mail to deliver to a domain that has

Re: sendmail mx question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/05/16 11:55, Markus Rosjat wrote: > I have a mail to deliver to a domain that has two mx record but the > 2nd record isn't really a mx (so I got told but the need to keep > that for some reasons). I would question their competence right

Re: doas.conf cmd with argument(s)

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:08:19AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > it is a bit inconsistent, yes. > > it is very much less readable with a line break. you could remove the > offset, but that doesn;t look great either. you could specify a smaller > offset and juggle the actual text a bit. > >

sendmail mx question

Hi there, this more a mail about confirming the problem isn't on my site here. So that's the case: I have a mail to deliver to a domain that has two mx record but the 2nd record isn't really a mx (so I got told but the need to keep that for some reasons). So far so good the priority on the

Re: OT: True hardware UNIX terminal

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:40:20PM -0600, Nick Bender wrote: > I wonder if any FORTRAN programmers out there remember the trick of putting > line numbers after column 72 so the card sort could sort your program back > into order when you dropped your card deck? This was not limited to FORTRAN.

Running OpenBSD 5.9 from libreboot without proprietary blobs is possible. Detailed instructions inside.

Libreboot is a free software BIOS replacement, see https://libreboot.org for details. It is a distribution of Coreboot without proprietary blobs, including CPU microcode. All tests were performed with Thinkpad X200, but it should work for most or all libreboot and autoboot machines. Since 5.9,

Re: muting keyboard bell broken on amd64 -current?

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:31:26AM +, li...@ggp2.com wrote: > > Can you reproduce it with an recent original snapshot kernel? > > My kernel is newer than the snapshot on the mirror I checked an hour or > so ago, so I'll wait until a new one hits and test. Using the latest snapshot the