Re: Attempting to configure syslogd for logging doas

2020-02-26 Thread ben
Hello, Raf; After creating the doas log file I was able to syslog was able to write messages to the file. I read the man page for newsyslog and have configured it for the doas log. Thank you for you help. Ben Raskin.

RE: size of size_t (diff angle)

2020-02-26 Thread zeurkous
Haai, "Marc Espie" wrote: >>> You're looking at the wrong type. size_t is very good for what it does. >> >> Yes; meproblem is with the 'what it does' part. > > It represents memory sizes. It works on anything with a sane > memory model. The way meunderstands it, it's just an offset, plain and

Re: Attempting to configure syslogd for logging doas

2020-02-26 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:59:40PM GMT, b...@0x1bi.net wrote: > I'm attempting to configure syslogd via syslog.conf. I've added two > lines which log all doas events: > > default configuration here... > > !doas > *.* /var/log/doas > > However, after restarting syslogd and

spamDB - blacklist mode

2020-02-26 Thread sub
Hi misc, Questions: Does the spamDB play a role at all in pure Black listing mode ? Does the spamDB only get created/configured when running in Normal/Grey mode ? Does is require Manual creation ? Issue: When Attempting to review SPAMDB entries i get an error: spamdb: cannot open /var/db/spamd

Re: size of size_t (diff angle)

2020-02-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:01:56PM +0100, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote: > Haai, > > "Marc Espie" wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:56:06AM +0100, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote: > > > > You're looking at the wrong type. size_t is very good for what it does. > > Yes; meproblem is with the 'what it does'

RE: size of size_t (diff angle)

2020-02-26 Thread zeurkous
Haai, "Marc Espie" wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:56:06AM +0100, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote: > > You're looking at the wrong type. size_t is very good for what it does. Yes; meproblem is with the 'what it does' part. > Try uintptr_t Are you proposing a change to struct iovec?

RE: size of size_t (diff angle)

2020-02-26 Thread zeurkous
Haai, "Anders Andersson" wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:14 PM wrote: >> >> First of all, let us reflect upon the definition of size_t in C99. >> >> > size_t >> > which is the unsigned integer type of the result of the sizeof >> > operator; >> >> That's not very specific. It kind-of implies

Same result (Re: build error on octeon, 6.6)

2020-02-26 Thread Pekka Niiranen
Hi misc, I got the same libLLVM error message "c++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault" after about 3 days since "make build". I tried twice and did not use any external drives. I have 16GB USB stick inside with - 512 MB / - 512 MB swap - 1GB /tmp - 1GB /var - 10GB /usr -

Re: PPTP NAT passthrough

2020-02-26 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
This appears to be actively maintained. https://sourceforge.net/projects/pptpclient/ On 02/25/20 12:15, Szél Gábor wrote: Dear @misc Our customer need more parallel outgoing PPTP session. I know PPTP is no security VPN, but our client not have any options. (our customer remote partner accept

Attempting to configure syslogd for logging doas

2020-02-26 Thread ben
I'm attempting to configure syslogd via syslog.conf. I've added two lines which log all doas events: default configuration here... !doas *.* /var/log/doas However, after restarting syslogd and attempting to running commands through doas, /var/log/doas is not being

IEEE 754 floating point, POSIX, C: Why are OpenBSD's logb and logbf wrong?

2020-02-26 Thread Neven Sajko
Hello, I am discussing the OpenBSD logb and logbf from the mathematical part of the C standard library, the same which were imported from NetBSD. They currently return constants for subnormal inputs. As far as I understand, this is not only not very useful for doing math, it also conflicts with

Re: pass 'password manager' problem

2020-02-26 Thread Shadrock Uhuru
On 26.02.2020 10:57, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:37:53AM +, Shadrock Uhuru wrote: > > --- > > > > shadrock Hi yes i have gpg2 installed gpg-agent.conf has cat .gnupg/gpg-agent.conf

Re: "not MAP_STACK" message in dmesg / system message buffer

2020-02-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:30:11PM -0500, Andre Smagin wrote: > Hello. > > While prototyping something in C, I made a mistake with > pre-processor macros, which I narrowed down to this: > > int > main() > { > char *test[10][2097152] = { { 0 } }; > } > > Running it results in > $ ./a.out

Re: size of size_t (diff angle)

2020-02-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:56:06AM +0100, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote: > Haai, > > The definition of size_t keeps biting me. > > Some background: in nnx, me's been using the equiv of caddr_t for > counts. This works well; yet, while writing against existing code that > uses size_t, an issue has

Re: What TERM fixes Emacs?

2020-02-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:35:21PM -0800, Emilia wrote: > > > It is impossible to use Emacs on OpenBSD Terminal (no X). > > Look at this screenshots: > > On Linux / macOs -- this same version of Emacs and org-mode would > display this file with colors etc. As stuart said, pccon is the

Re: pass 'password manager' problem

2020-02-26 Thread Shadrock Uhuru
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:11:19 - (UTC) As far as I have seen in the pass script, --batch mode is oly invoked if you are running a gpg agent or are running gpg2. Do you have gpg2 installed? Do you have a gpg agent configured? You may need to include the following line in your

Re: Trusted Boot with OpenBSD

2020-02-26 Thread Frank Beuth
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:22:28PM +0100, Julius Zint wrote: boot(8) supports the machine specific command "tpm". This allows a user to: 1: read the current contents of the Platform Control Registers (PCR) with the "pcr" parameter machine tpm p[cr] 2: seal a user supplied secret to the

Re: Determining which patches a snapshot contains

2020-02-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-02-25, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Fair enough - I can understand you don't want to give any guarantees for > snapshots. > > I guess it's fair to assume that snapshots are only built from full commits > and not partial commits? In this case then, I guess I should be fine. Snapshots can