On 19/03/2020 8:45 am, Martijn van Duren wrote:
On 3/18/20 8:41 PM, Matthieu wrote:
Le 18/03/2020 à 19:39, Hiltjo Posthuma a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Matthieu wrote:
Hi everybody
I'm looking to use OpenDKIM with OpenSMTPd. Has anyone ever done it before ?
My first
Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:55:53 -0400 Jeffrey Walton
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:25 AM Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:59:21AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020-03-18,
Hi Jan,
Jan Prunk wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:08:26PM +0100:
> 0
> C Slovenia
> P SI
> T Ljubljana
> F Irregular
> O BSD User Group Slovenia
> I Jan Prunk
> M b...@groups.io
> U https://bsdug.wordpress.com
> N *BSD
I suggest you resubmit when a few meetings have taken place.
So far, i see
On 3/18/20 8:41 PM, Matthieu wrote:
> Le 18/03/2020 à 19:39, Hiltjo Posthuma a écrit :
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Matthieu wrote:
>>> Hi everybody
>>> I'm looking to use OpenDKIM with OpenSMTPd. Has anyone ever done it before ?
>>> My first intention is to sign mails from
On 03-18 20:29, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I have definitely collaborated with at least these NetBSD developers
> in the past:
And a lame but sincere thanks to Ingo, Theo, and everyone else,
for the impressive work freely given, and for patiently tolerating
the rest of us.
Le 18/03/2020 à 19:39, Hiltjo Posthuma a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Matthieu wrote:
Hi everybody
I'm looking to use OpenDKIM with OpenSMTPd. Has anyone ever done it before ?
My first intention is to sign mails from different domains on a single mail
server. So the
Hi,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:44:03PM -0600:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Jeffrey Walton wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:55:53AM -0400:
>>> I assumed OpenBSD and NetBSD were collaborating and shared code
>>> and docs in some places.
>> To a limited extent, that is true.
>
On 03-18 19:22, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Ingo -- I think using man.openbsd.org as a "testbed for all possible
> > man page hierarchies" incorrect.
>
> It was never a testbed, but a production service with several parts
> provided nowhere else (well, at least until FreeBSD followed our
> lead and
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> Jeffrey Walton wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:55:53AM -0400:
>
> > I assumed OpenBSD and NetBSD were collaborating and shared code and
> > docs in some places.
>
> To a limited extent, that is true.
To a limited extent, it is true that birds and fish
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Matthieu wrote:
> Hi everybody
> I'm looking to use OpenDKIM with OpenSMTPd. Has anyone ever done it before ?
> My first intention is to sign mails from different domains on a single mail
> server. So the
>
> OpenDKIM works with a socket and I don't know
Hi Jeffrey,
Jeffrey Walton wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:55:53AM -0400:
> I assumed OpenBSD and NetBSD were collaborating and shared code and
> docs in some places.
To a limited extent, that is true.
For example, NetBSD includes mandoc(1) which is predominantly
developed on OpenBSD while
Hi everybody
I'm looking to use OpenDKIM with OpenSMTPd. Has anyone ever done it
before ?
My first intention is to sign mails from different domains on a single
mail server. So the
OpenDKIM works with a socket and I don't know how and if it works with
the smptd filter.
I've seen the
Hi Theo,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 09:06:25AM -0600:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> What is the purpose of supplying man pages for the wrong operating
>> system?
The purpose is to make it simpler to compare how different systems
work without having to jump back and forth among
0
C Slovenia
P SI
T Ljubljana
F Irregular
O BSD User Group Slovenia
I Jan Prunk
M b...@groups.io
U https://bsdug.wordpress.com
N *BSD
Although this is not the kind of response you are expecting... I have spent
tremendous amount of time playing around with these voip hodge-podge softphones
like Jitsi, Qualcom, Ekiga, Linphone etc etc. One is worst than the other, they
are all full of bugs, their dev teams/community suck so
On 2020/03/18 11:55, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:25 AM Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:59:21AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:25 AM Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:59:21AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > > According to
> > > >
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:08:10PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> I haven't used jitsi yet, but other video-converencing web sites
> properly work in firefox. Jitsi claim they support chrome only, but
> according to the settings window's microphone level meter, it's
> properly
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:59:21AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > According to https://man.openbsd.org/NetBSD-8.1/security.7#FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > > OpenBSD implements glibc bounds checking on
On 3/18/20 3:59 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> According to https://man.openbsd.org/NetBSD-8.1/security.7#FORTIFY_SOURCE
>>> OpenBSD implements glibc bounds checking on certain functions. I am
>>>
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > According to https://man.openbsd.org/NetBSD-8.1/security.7#FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > > OpenBSD implements glibc bounds checking on certain functions. I am
> > > trying to
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:26 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > According to https://man.openbsd.org/NetBSD-8.1/security.7#FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > OpenBSD implements glibc bounds checking on certain functions. I am
> > trying to detect FORTIFY_SOURCE without
On 2020/03/19 00:55, tom ryan wrote:
> On 2020-03-18 19:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020-03-17, Flipchan wrote:
> >> Yeah the point with a cdn is to lower the latency of it so therefor you
> >> what is needed is just not only a fast http server but a traffic
> >> redirector depending on
On 2020-03-18 19:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-03-17, Flipchan wrote:
>> Yeah the point with a cdn is to lower the latency of it so therefor you what
>> is needed is just not only a fast http server but a traffic redirector
>> depending on the end users origin
>
> Doing this via
On 2020-03-17, Flipchan wrote:
> Yeah the point with a cdn is to lower the latency of it so therefor you what
> is needed is just not only a fast http server but a traffic redirector
> depending on the end users origin
Doing this via redirects does not lower latency, it increases it.
It may
On 2020-03-18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> According to https://man.openbsd.org/NetBSD-8.1/security.7#FORTIFY_SOURCE
> OpenBSD implements glibc bounds checking on certain functions. I am
> trying to detect FORTIFY_SOURCE without looking up operating system
> names and versions.
That is a NetBSD
I sent a diff to tech@ that should solve your problem:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=158447623916319=2
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 04:12:00PM +, Peter Müller wrote:
> Hello openbsd-misc,
>
> I am strongly interested in this, too.
>
> Since the iked manpage does not mention this, I suppose
27 matches
Mail list logo
