On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:22 PM Tito Mari Francis Escaño
wrote:
>
> Hi misc,
> I'm building an OpenBSD desktop PC and would like to use my Royal Kludge
> RK71 mechanical keyboard with it via USB Bluetooth dongle.
> Can somebody please point me to USB Bluetooth dongles tested working with
>
Hi misc,
I'm building an OpenBSD desktop PC and would like to use my Royal Kludge
RK71 mechanical keyboard with it via USB Bluetooth dongle.
Can somebody please point me to USB Bluetooth dongles tested working with
OpenBSD?
Hopefully you can guide me.
Thanks so much.
> On 16. Sep 2020, at 20.27, Juha Erkkilä wrote:
>
>
>> On 16. Sep 2020, at 0.18, Kenneth Gober wrote:
>> I took a very quick look at the source and it appears that 213 is shown in
>> octal. I believe that the 200 bit indicates that a core file was produced,
>> and 13 is probably a signal
In relayd.conf you use something like this for each domain you are reverse
proxying:
# load certs
tls keypair www.example.com
tls keypair www.another_example.net
tls keypair www.third_example.com
Put your certs in
/etc/ssl/
and keys in
/etc/ssl/private/
they have to be named so they match the
Hi All,
I am attempting to setup secure DNS on an OpenBSD 6.7 system using NSD,
Unbound and a package called Opendnssec.
I seem to have arrived at a point where one of the Opendnssec daemons,
"ods-signerd", crashes on startup i.e.
> # ods-signerd -dv
> OpenDNSSEC signer engine version 2.1.6
>
On 2020-09-21, open...@kene.nu wrote:
>> > My basic ruleset snippet:
>> > pass quick on vlan100 from any to any
>> > match out on vlan200 nat-to vlan200
>> > pass out on vlan200
>> > block out quick on vlan200 from
>>
>> If this is your actual ruleset, you are observing the intended behavior.
>>
Yesterday, I wrote an unprivileged sandboxing tool for OpenBSD, based
on pledge(2) and unveil(2). I have included the complete C source
code below, and also attached it in case this makes it easier to use.
I called it pledge(1), but am open to suggestions for a better
name. The tool makes
On 2020-09-21 12:51, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> Yesterday, I wrote an unprivileged sandboxing tool for OpenBSD, based
> on pledge(2) and unveil(2). I have included the complete C source
> code below, and also attached it in case this makes it easier to use.
I just realized that I forgot to include
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:44:17PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
Hello Jan,
> Presumably, as the default -s size is picked, and the camera cannot do 30
> fps in that size, -r 20 is chosen instead.
>
> If that's correct, the default size in effect overrides a specified rate.
> Is that intended?
>
> It
This is 6.8-beta/amd64 on a Thinkpad T400 (dmesg below)
using the following cheap USB camera/mic ("SriHome"):
uvideo0 at uhub7 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "webcam webcam" rev
2.00/0.10 addr 2
video0 at uvideo0
$ video -q
video device /dev/video:
encodings: yuy2
frame sizes (width x
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:14:25PM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> > > can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
> >
> > It would be interesting to hear which shreds of information you found.
> >
> Mainly this which I see now contradicts itself.
>
To whom it may concern,
I have an Acusis, which should be a USB microphone and speaker.
https://www.crowdsupply.com/antimatter-research/acusis
I have managed to use my Acusis in Trisquel (GNU/Linux) to record and
play simultaneously. I tried this in OpenBSD, but I manage only
to record, never to
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 1:39 PM Peter N. M. Hansteen
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:46:15PM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
>
> > I am seeing what could be expected behaviour but the small shreds of
> info I
> > can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
>
> It would be interesting to hear
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:46:15PM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> I am seeing what could be expected behaviour but the small shreds of info I
> can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
It would be interesting to hear which shreds of information you found.
>
> I have a box that acts as a
Hello,
I am seeing what could be expected behaviour but the small shreds of info I
can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
I have a box that acts as a router and firewall. It forwards packets from
the internal lan (call it vlan100) and sends it natted out on the external
lan (call it
On 2020-09-21, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> As of the port blocking unfortunately I am old enough to remember this
> post
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tcp.html#why
>
> and the remark that TCP is only needed for records larger than 512
> bytes.
>
> "You want to publish record sets larger than 512
On 2020-09-19, Benjamin Raskin wrote:
> Hello, Misc;
>
> I'm attempting to configure relayd to work as a reverse proxy, such that all
> web traffic goes through relayd prior to reaching some web server. I'm
> confused as to how I am to configure the ssl cert and key options in the
> relayd
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:17:47PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Nicolai wrote :
>
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:43:41AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> >
> > > For number of years I had in my /var/unbound/etc/unbound.conf line
> > >
> > > do-tcp: no
> >
> > > To make things worse I
18 matches
Mail list logo
