Re: Machine age and OpenBSD - Thinkpad R51e

On 6/15/21 8:14 PM, Thomas Vetere wrote: Hello everyone, I was looking to get a laptop to run OpenBSD. The one I am looking at in particular is the Thinkpad R51e (2005). I like this particular model because it does not come with any extra hardware that OpenBSD does not support in the first

Re: Machine age and OpenBSD - Thinkpad R51e

Thomas Vetere writes: > Hello everyone, > > I was looking to get a laptop to run OpenBSD. The one I am looking at in > particular is the Thinkpad R51e (2005). I like this particular model > because it does not come with any extra hardware that OpenBSD does not > support in the first place

Machine age and OpenBSD - Thinkpad R51e

Hello everyone, I was looking to get a laptop to run OpenBSD. The one I am looking at in particular is the Thinkpad R51e (2005). I like this particular model because it does not come with any extra hardware that OpenBSD does not support in the first place (bluetooth, camera, etc.) My main concern

Re: Who is responsible for ports.su? (admittedly a non-canon resource)

On 2021-06-15, Marc Espie wrote: > I think that his approach is doomed to fail. > > There are a lot of tricky parts to flavors and multipackages and > normalization. If you don't use the actual ports/packages framework code, > you have to figure it out all over again by yourself. > > and there

Re: Prometheus on OpenBSD - does it work?

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:47 AM Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:24:08PM +0200, Julien Pivotto wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am a Prometheus maintainer and we have received a bug regarding > > Prometheus - prometheus would no longer work on OpenBSD since we > > introduced MMAP:

Re: Prometheus on OpenBSD - does it work?

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:24:08PM +0200, Julien Pivotto wrote: > Hello, > > I am a Prometheus maintainer and we have received a bug regarding > Prometheus - prometheus would no longer work on OpenBSD since we > introduced MMAP: > > https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/issues/8877 >

Re: Who is responsible for ports.su? (admittedly a non-canon resource)

I think that his approach is doomed to fail. There are a lot of tricky parts to flavors and multipackages and normalization. If you don't use the actual ports/packages framework code, you have to figure it out all over again by yourself. and there are lots of gremlins. The official code is

Prometheus on OpenBSD - does it work?

Hello, I am a Prometheus maintainer and we have received a bug regarding Prometheus - prometheus would no longer work on OpenBSD since we introduced MMAP: https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/issues/8877 https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/issues/8799 I would like to know if the facts

Re: EACCES of UDP packet

use ktrace Siegfried Levin wrote: > Hi, > > I have a application run by a normal user communicating with the server with > UDP. It crashes very occasionally, like once per week, due to EACCES when > sending a UDP packet. According to the manpage >

EACCES of UDP packet

Hi, I have a application run by a normal user communicating with the server with UDP. It crashes very occasionally, like once per week, due to EACCES when sending a UDP packet. According to the manpage (https://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-6.9/sendmsg.2#EACCES), the reason might be either being

Re: Who is responsible for ports.su? (admittedly a non-canon resource)

Thank you! I'll get around to that shortly, hopefully. On 14/06/2021, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > rop...@gmail.com (ropers), 2021.06.14 (Mon) 00:21 (CEST): >> > On 2021-06-13, ropers wrote: >> >> Sorry to disturb, but does anyone know how to contact whoever is >> >> responsible for ports.su? >> >>

Re: openbgpd "depend on"

Hello Stuart, I see not that I have not been entirely clear on my setup. Traditionally I used carp on both upstream interfaces (to have a common nexthop address in BGP routing) and also on my downstream interfaces (to have a floating default gateway for my hosts). As it stands now I cannot use a