On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 8:13 PM wrote:
> Please see "Are all BSDs created equally. OpenBSD vs NetBSD vs FreeBSD"
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvSPqo3_3vM
>
> How they are handled is another matter, but its just as easy as it is in
> other OS's.
>
> Do you believe that OpenBSD has less attack
It depends on your threat model. All else being equal, using a less
known OS can even be safer. A popular OS will have many people
motivated to dedicate time to find flaws and thus, will have many more
known vulnerabilities plus a number of holes that are not disclosed by
the reearchers. If
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:16:32PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
> Trying to manually monitor channel 132, I get an error, SIOCS80211CHANNEL.
>
> # ifconfig iwm0
> iwm0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> lladdr 80:19:34:ab:ab:ab
> index 5 priority 4 llprio 3
> groups: wlan
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:34:04PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:07:33PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
>> Just sitting around doing nothing I'm seeing 30% loss to my next hop.
>>
>> # ifconfig iwm0
>> iwm0: flags=808843 mtu 1500
>> lladdr 80:19:34:ab:ab:ab
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 05:54:03PM -0700, Jacqueline Jolicoeur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mar 12 16:39, i...@tutanota.com wrote:
> > I know I am not going to get any points for this, but I had to fix a broken
> > OpenBSD box today that could not boot and I didn't have any network for a
> > couple of
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:07:33PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
> Just sitting around doing nothing I'm seeing 30% loss to my next hop.
>
> # ifconfig iwm0
> iwm0: flags=808843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 80:19:34:ab:ab:ab
> index 5 priority 4 llprio 3
> groups: wlan egress
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 09:42:37PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:05:00PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:58:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
>> >> Well, even
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:05:00PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:58:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
> >> Well, even after adding iwm0 I notice high latency and packet loss anywhere
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:58:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
>> Well, even after adding iwm0 I notice high latency and packet loss anywhere
>> from 15-50%. This occurs randomly when the device is either 2m, 10m, or 30m
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
> Well, even after adding iwm0 I notice high latency and packet loss anywhere
> from 15-50%. This occurs randomly when the device is either 2m, 10m, or 30m
> away from the access point. I did testing to verify I'm seeing
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:34:23AM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:43:57AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>On 2022-03-14, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
>If not, consider hunting down a mini PCIe iwm(4) 7260 card, or an
>M.2 AX200 iwx(4) card with an
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:31:13PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Roaming decisions are client-side though there are some things an AP can
> do to influence them.
At present, with non communicating AP, the android clients are holding
to their AP for way too long. For example if I enable wifi
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:43:57AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2022-03-14, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote:
If not, consider hunting down a mini PCIe iwm(4) 7260 card, or an
M.2 AX200 iwx(4) card with an adapter from M.2 to mini PCIe.
Both would need compatible pigtails and
On 2022-03-14, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:32:35PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> There's no chance of meeting all of these requirements with OpenBSD.
>>
>> For AP-side 11ac there are some bwfm(4) devices which _might_ do but they
>> are not common. Really at this point
On 2022-03-14, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:58:07AM +0100, Nicolas Goy wrote:
>> I actually have an OpenWRT box (LTE SMS gateway, the LTE modem wasn't
>> compatible with OpenBSD when I installed it), and yeah, it is very
>> decent. I guess that would be a viable
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:32:35PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There's no chance of meeting all of these requirements with OpenBSD.
>
> For AP-side 11ac there are some bwfm(4) devices which _might_ do but they
> are not common. Really at this point the emphasis for wifi on OpenBSD
> is for
On 2022-03-14, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use OpenBSD for all my network gears except wireless access points.
>
> My current access points are getting old and I'd like to replace them.
>
> I did a bit of researches and there are quite some boards supported by
> OpenBSD, but I cannot find
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:58:07AM +0100, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> I actually have an OpenWRT box (LTE SMS gateway, the LTE modem wasn't
> compatible with OpenBSD when I installed it), and yeah, it is very
> decent. I guess that would be a viable alternative.
It is possible to install OpenWRT on some
Hi, i have an ubiquiti u6-lr connected in bridge mode with an openbsd router.
The controller runs on the openbsd, take a look at ports packages. It works
like a sharm and i can reach about 400 mbps in wifi.
Regards,
Paulo.
> Em 14 de mar. de 2022, à(s) 04:41, Stuart Longland
> escreveu:
On Mar 14 01:52:15, k...@goyman.com wrote:
> I use OpenBSD for all my network gears except wireless access points.
Same here.
> My current access points are getting old and I'd like to replace them.
> I did a bit of researches and there are quite some boards
> supported by OpenBSD, but I cannot
20 matches
Mail list logo
