On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 3:27 PM Marc Espie wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:13:42AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022-05-06, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > While we could readily make libssl fall back to the legacy stack if
> > > SSL_OP_NO_TICKET is disabled, I don't think this
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:39:51PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 5/6/22 2:30 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 5/6/22 12:48 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Florian Obser wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, if you end up with a /bsd.upgrade on the running system that is
> > > > still mode 0700, your bootloader
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:13:42AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-05-06, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > While we could readily make libssl fall back to the legacy stack if
> > SSL_OP_NO_TICKET is disabled, I don't think this optimization outweighs
> > the overall benefit of TLSv1.3 - better
Agreed, pkg_add is super fast now. Thank you Marc!
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 4:07 AM Jan Stary wrote:
>
> On May 06 08:13:42, stu.li...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> > On 2022-05-06, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > While we could readily make libssl fall back to the legacy stack if
> > > SSL_OP_NO_TICKET is
Good day,
I usually code with Atom, it's elegant and very efficient with for
instance multiple line selection,
though I could really find an alternative to it, are there similar
editors in package ?
Specifically the multiline work is very helpful that ought to be enough.
Have I missed
On May 06 08:13:42, stu.li...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> On 2022-05-06, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > While we could readily make libssl fall back to the legacy stack if
> > SSL_OP_NO_TICKET is disabled, I don't think this optimization outweighs
> > the overall benefit of TLSv1.3 - better protocol,
6 matches
Mail list logo
