On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:21:03AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Silly question… is there a tool for encrypting files with asymmetric
> keys on OpenBSD? I'm aware of GnuPG in ports, and I'm fine with using
> that, however I'm curious to know what other options there are out
>
> On May 8, 2023, at 5:32 PM, Sonic wrote:
>
> No real difference in the output of ifconfig or netstat before and
> after restarting the network after a reboot.
> The .45 alias refuses to accept/pass data other than answer a ping
> after booting until the network, or at least the interface
On 2023-05-08 23:15, Tor Houghton wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 04:40:21PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > wgport port-number wgkey my-private-key
> > inet 10.0.98.1/24
> >
> > [snip]
>
> Here's[*] a super hacky way to convert a pivpn wireguard config file to output
>
Hi all,
Silly question… is there a tool for encrypting files with asymmetric
keys on OpenBSD? I'm aware of GnuPG in ports, and I'm fine with using
that, however I'm curious to know what other options there are out
there, especially options that are part of the base system.
I know OpenSSL (and
No real difference in the output of ifconfig or netstat before and
after restarting the network after a reboot.
The .45 alias refuses to accept/pass data other than answer a ping
after booting until the network, or at least the interface (em0) that
contains the alias is restarted.
>From outside
On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 04:40:21PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> wgport port-number wgkey my-private-key
> inet 10.0.98.1/24
>
> [snip]
Here's[*] a super hacky way to convert a pivpn wireguard config file to output
that can be placed in a /etc/hostname.wg0 file, if this helps
On 2023-05-06 11:54 am, Hannu Vuolasaho wrote:
Hello,
I made a silly mistake when I set up my VM and my disk image is too
small for my next operation.
My plan is to give the new image to the VM, run a minimal install on
it so I get the boot loader installed. Also disklabel will be good.
...
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:24 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> There's not enough information really. /etc/hostname.* and maybe results
> of ifconfig -A and netstat -rn might give more clues.
Here's that info - hopefully not munged beyond use.
Note that this is after the interface has been restarted
is anyone aware of such a nice little device with low power consumption
and ECC memory? The alternatives mentioned so far just offer normal RAM
options...
On 2023-05-08, Sonic wrote:
> This is repeatable every time. After a boot the .45 alias does not
> pass any traffic, its ports are closed. It will answer a ping, and
> shows up in "ifconfig -A" (or em0) and in netstat.
> The other 3 addresses work normally.
> Restarting the interface with "sh
This is repeatable every time. After a boot the .45 alias does not
pass any traffic, its ports are closed. It will answer a ping, and
shows up in "ifconfig -A" (or em0) and in netstat.
The other 3 addresses work normally.
Restarting the interface with "sh /etc/netstart em0" brings the .45
alias
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:14:43AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> > While diagnosing an unrelated matter, I find that 'bgpctl show rib'
> > has difficulty with the 'in' keyword. The 'out' counterpart works as
> > expected. Looking at
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> While diagnosing an unrelated matter, I find that 'bgpctl show rib'
> has difficulty with the 'in' keyword. The 'out' counterpart works as
> expected. Looking at bgpctl(8), the following should work (but
> doesn't):
> $ bgpctl show
I will try and summarize the replies succinctly. As Stuart mentioned, by
wanting fanless AND rackmount, I was certainly limiting my choices.
Thanks - Damian
14 matches
Mail list logo
