Exactly what are yo consolidating here peter? If it is blacklists or
traplists from various sources, I think this may do people a
disservice.
The problem if you are aggregating the traplists is that users don't
have a clue where stuff is coming from. They know the person is
trapped because they
It is being worked on. It will be fixed shortly.
2009/10/1 Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Steve fivering...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
spamd-setup is generating a 404 not found message while trying to download
/spamd/nixspam.gz
Is there a process change that I
Again? sheesh, it wasn't supposed to, we had talked to them.
2009/9/30 K.R. (Randy) Lewis ra...@rtmx.net:
Has anyone else noticed the nixspam list (via link) disappearing from
the http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/ page today?
Randy
--
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden,
why is it left to rot?
It is left there for historical reasons, because some old applications
may use it.
For new applications we do not use it, but prefer to use a properly
designed sysctl or ioctl
interface to retrieve information
That is my $1.87 worth - flame me - stone me - whatever if you must -
but again it is just one man's opinion.
Don't be sorry, that's one of the better and more literate rants I've seen
on misc@ in a while.
boo hoo. run one machine somewhere and make release. done.
Once you have a built release you can run upgrades everywhere from
that release tarball.
man release
to figure out how to do that.
Now you may ask, why don't we do that? We simply do not have the
resources and time to
devote racks of
I think you're missing the point; marco was talking about the dumbing down of
what's considered acceptible for being called a professional; in this case,
mostly the fact that once you start presenting system administration as a
series of buttons to push, you get button-pushing monkeys, not
But come on Bret, that's what the industry WANTS.. you can PAY monkeys
less!
Push Butan
...receive bacon lube
Keep it Sizzlin!
(you can't hear it but I'm doing the little techno pelvic dance right now..)
Practically speaking, the people who need the performance at the
edge of what OpenBSD can deliver usually are too busy to argue
benchmarks.
Precisely.
From: OpenBSD general usage list misc@openbsd.org
this thread is fucking stupid.
I didn't need the second part...
How about just saying something when the thread is NOT stupid.
Well, I've heard that it needs to be mauve,because that has more RAM,
otherwise it's a fabulous OS.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Milan BartoE! merlyn...@gmail.com wrote:
I still hear people (mostly younger people) complain about OpenBSD
performance
I still hear people telling that
I get these, but this and other reasons are why you have to do more than
*just* greylist. Yes, I greylist of
course, but greylisting is one tool. the key thing it gives you is time to
look at the sending profile of
the bozo sending the stuff.
When it's going to wait 30 minutes before it gets in
You'll never get anywhere.
Frankly your ship has got a flat tyre and the lights are on. Yes the
lights are ON!
It's your fault developers.
BrokenBSD.
Of course you don't realize, we knew it was you when you ordered so we
only put a handle on your mug, just to fuck with your little head
I saw your post on that list, and I knew he was coming, so I shipped
out a broken snapshot to cause him harm, on purpose.
Be sure to let us know if it i being reccommended on freebsd or linux lists
in the next week and we filesystem developers will try to make sure the tree
is well and truly
Traplists do not go into tables. (for this exact reason) only the
whitelisted
hosts go into tables guys.
Bob
* Peter N. M. Hansteen pe...@bsdly.net [2009-07-28 15:31]:
Renaud Allard ren...@allard.it writes:
It happened to me also with servers with huge white/black lists. If
* Marcello Cruz marcello.c...@globo.com [2009-07-29 10:51]:
Dear all,
Is there a way to use LDAP in a rule to allow or deny based on the user
instead of the IP Address?
Define user - in the context of IP. last time I looked no such thing
was in there.
authpf comes close,
Trapping an address only affects new connections that are looked up in
the
database. it does not affect existing passed connections. spamd only updates
the
tables on it's scan of the database so these will not take effect immediately.
-Bob
* Peter N. M. Hansteen
I have looked at it because it is of potential interest to me,
however it is not simply porting a filesystem, there are hacks in a number of
places in their buffer cache layer to treat things special for HammerFS, so
more work needs to be done in that area before this could be considered.
* Ross Cameron ross.came...@linuxpro.co.za [2009-07-15 03:19]:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Anton Karpovtoxah...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Provos's blog,
http://www.provos.org/index.php?/archives/34-Evading-System-Sandbox-Containme
nt.html
The initial prototype of Systrace as
* Daniel Barowy m...@barowy.net [2009-07-15 09:58]:
Hello everyone,
This is, I'm sure, a naive question, so bear with me. What is the
purpose of /usr/libexec? I see from hier(7) that it has something
to do with System daemons and utilities (executed by other
programs) which probably
* Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info [2009-07-15 11:22]:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:31:11 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Does everyone on this list have ADD?
Commit to usr.bin/mg/theo.c please ;-)
No, because all of us that read misc@ say this every single day :)
theo.c
* Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info [2009-07-05 11:05]:
On 10:36, Sun 05 Jul 09, stan wrote:
I am trying to get OpenBSD 4.5 working as a guest OS using KVM on Linux. I
have been able to get 4.4 to install and run fine, but 4.5 never gives me a
login prompt. The last message I see is
* Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz [2009-07-14 10:40]:
I have seen many emails for non-existent users greylisted.
Never thought twice about it.
What I just saw is new (to me at least) are wrong domains:
* x x tonino-pa...@lycos.com [2009-06-06 18:04]:
The spam we seem to be getting as being part of this mailing list, is it
just an unfortunate thing have to live with? Is there someway to make
sure only get legit discussions/questions?
Yes, kick all the idiots off and only allow members
joke accessory=can-opener
Original thread:
http://marc.info/?t=12428629293r=1w=2
Message that Bob replied to, starting a new thread (at least as far as
Gmail is concerned):
The in-reply-to header was correct, just because the subject line
changes doesn't make it a new
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
, end with . on a line by itself
From: Bob Beck Via Secure Email b...@openbsd.org
To: misc@openbsd.org
X-Security-Verified: Trusted Email. Always Watch for this
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
.
250 2.0.0 n4RFs9K8004500 Message accepted
* Michal mic...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-21 11:01]:
Oh I didnt realise it was that under-poweredoh now I just feel stupid
:(
Well, we are all laughing at you. but only because too many of us get hit
with
this bullshit at work.
http://a2.vox.com/6a00d09e512cfdbe2b00f30f5b193a0001-pi
I
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly
marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their
email doesn't work
IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK
We are refreshing our
Nothing that out of the ordinary. just your run of the mill
massive joe job attack against @ualberta.ca - someone whanging out a metric
bungwad of spam with bogus @ualberta.ca from addresses. the attempted
bounces get trapped.
It appears to be subsiding so that will probably
an MTA that has a horrible security track record.
Yes, Unix has a horrible security record. you shouldn't use it.
My god, remember all those horrible SunOS 4 exploits and the morris worm?
surely it must suck since software never changes.
-Bob
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid idiot
at the keyboard into doing something retarded. The OS can be the most
secure thing on the planet and if the person at the keyboard is stupid
you'll
http://www.osnews.com/story/21441/Debian_Switching_to_EGLIBC
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980
Shut up! You should be punished anyway!
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-08/msg00053.html
Silence... I kill You!
e.g. ftp://mirrors.nic.funet.fi/ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/
I'll make a bulk check of the mirrors that haven't got 4.5 yet
sometime soon and remind them to update their rsync inclusion
lists. I'll give it a bit longer because some are probably
still trying to fetch the release.
And
was delisted from the ftp.html page on Mon Apr 6.
Can you just stop bashing Wim? It doesn't make anyone happier (except
Theo probably). Or maybe we should rush searching the whole fscking
internet for the incorrect OpenBSD mirrors? Chill out, dudes.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:21 -0600, Bob Beck wrote
* Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org [2009-04-26 05:05]:
On 2009-04-25, eagir...@cox.net eagir...@cox.net wrote:
The RIT mirror is providing 4.2 sets from it's snapshots directory.
Should they still be listed?
snapshots aren't compulsory for a mirror, and they are providing
the
If you are able to weed out illegitimate recipients, this may go a long
way to reduce spam, or at least it did for us. Looking the email
address up in LDAP is *much* cheaper than doing a call-out to the
backend server(s). Greylisting helps us, too, but seems to cost mail
from broken servers
i think part of the success i experience using SPF as a means to create
whitelists is in the fact that i maintain the list of domains i fancy
whitelisting. unfortunately, it would be trivial for someone to take
advantage of an spf-based automatic whitelist to slip right on thru
Auto-whitelisting based on input from the spammer is bad. You may as
well save yourself the trouble and not use spamd.
Indeed. it is utterly mentally retarded. most spam is bogusly sent from real
envelope senders. Smart spammers just randomize their recipient lists
and use them as the
some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
Yeah... you're like... the guy who is sits outside the estwing
factory hitting his balls with an estwing hammer - telling everyone
who comes in and out that
I have a t5xxx also and want to do the same, but if I use usb flash (tried
and worked fine), how to limit at max disk writes ? so the flash can live
longer ...
Please let me know if you find an answer to this question. I have all these
openbsd machines booking off hard drives, and I'm trying
* Juan Jimenez Galdos juangmgald...@gmail.com [2009-04-16 14:37]:
Hi. I want download OPenBSD 4.5 but i can't. I try to enter in the directory
but it says 550 /pub/OpenBSD/4.5: Permission denied. The others
directories work well.
That's funny. it works for me.. I wonder what your issue is?
* Cezary Morga c...@therek.net [2009-04-09 15:14]:
Nick Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Bryan Irvine sparcta...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that you can't use the pf mailing list from gmail.
-Bryan
Because people who use gmail aren't smart enough for PF?
:10:37 -0700
From: Bob Beck beck
To: Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us, hack...@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Itojun, and sending our regards.
Message-ID: 20071105231037.gk...@bofh.cns.ualberta.ca
Mail-Followup-To: Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us, hack...@openbsd.org
References: 20071104174010.gd26
:10:37 -0700
From: Bob Beck beck
To: Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us, hack...@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Itojun, and sending our regards.
Message-ID: 20071105231037.gk...@bofh.cns.ualberta.ca
Mail-Followup-To: Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us, hack...@openbsd.org
References: 20071104174010.gd26
to fund OpenBSD events in europe?
-Bob
yes, it was just a pass through transaction, just as the sponsor money
that was destined for Opencon
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com wrote:
* Wim Vandeputte wim.vandepu...@gmail.com [2009-04-07 12:26]:
Two
* Wim Vandeputte wim.vandepu...@gmail.com [2009-04-07 12:26]:
Two developers who wanted to contribute to the funeral did not have a
credit card and asked me if they could wire the money to the IBAN
account I then forwarded the money with my credit card towards the
paypal account
Which
Others are trying to do it too, but they are just more quiet about it.
And then there's the other catagory... the breeders...
No, you're forgetting the third category - the titanium clipped,
whose ungrateful spawn are now 18 and will soon be old enough to be
capable of leaving the
* Peter N. M. Hansteen pe...@bsdly.net [2009-02-02 10:22]:
Jose Fragoso inet_use...@samerica.com writes:
This list has gone quite small in size recently. The size changed from
above 10 IP addresses to only 1 now. Could it be because
University of Alberta is not being targeted so
it because they have become more selective in trapping addresses?
Oh and it's not because of this. We just managed to expire 66,000
accounts
here which will only make the trapping get better ;)
On 26-Sep-08, at 14:43, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM, John Nietzsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am searching for a tutorial on this regards that explain howto
implement it using ANSI C (I don't really care about the math
background abot this subject).
On 16-Jul-08, at 12:14 PM, Steve Shockley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a monkey.
Hey but I am! Pass the banana flavoured lube!
Oook oook oook!
Now could we return to useful conversation instead of feeding the
trolls?
-Bob
We're having some major electrical work done in our data centre.
While I have UPS, the nature of the work means I don't have air conditioning ;)
The result is some of the OpenBSD sites (ftp, www, anoncvs, etc.)
may be unavailable for much of this morning - potentially into the
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-13 21:46]:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:22:07PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
When I read that, it sounded a lot to me like saying if you're not a
skilled medical practitioner, you don't deserve decent health care.
Seems to me one of the
Me! Me! Ship it to my address:
51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1301
USA
-Bob
* Breen Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-14 13:02]:
OpenBSD developers,
In recognition of all the bullshit flying around recently on misc@, I
would like to offer to mail my
] [2007-12-14 13:41]:
It's yours Bob. Given the address you've posted, I imagine that you
might want me to send it in care of someone with the initials RMS?
Breeno
Bob Beck wrote:
Me! Me! Ship it to my address:
51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1301
USA
-Bob
Having recipes for non-free programs in the ports system is more like
including present-day neofascist web sites in the list of interesting
links in your web site. I am against censorship, so I do not believe
in closing down those neofascist web sites. But I won't refer people
to them.
If you like the current way it works, you should be able to continue
with this system. But what if my mum, who has low computer skill, would
like to install a free, functional and secure system? I think the
software should help her to make the most accurate choices. Because I
think my
Users who can no invest the effort learn enough to use a simple
interface do not deserve a reliable operating system. They deserve windows,
and they deserve pop up buttong in their browsers that they click ok blindly
for everything.
-Bob
Do you apply this reasoning to
* Mathieu Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-12 11:23]:
Hello,
First I apologize if this is not the good address to post this kind of
message. I didn't find a 'getting involved' link on the 0penBSD website.
Well, OpenBSD seems to care about quality, so as a developper I thought
this would
* Matthew Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-06 15:54]:
Does anyone have recommendations on server hardware for setting up a
redundant OpenBSD firewall? Right now our network handles several
million HTTP requests per day, and we expect that to continue growing.
I expect a simple pair of Dell
The latter is far more accurate than the former.
Greg
Good god folks, just stop it. It's GPL, so it isn't going to happen.
-Bob
do you have any idea how hard it really is to mount such an attack?
without being detected? and what's the trojan going to do? copy all
your secrets to their national citizen oppression center? how do they
get their nefarious packets through your firewall without notice?
Of course
Can you dismiss PKI and the benefits that OpenPGP signatures provide to your
user community? Knowing that xyz binary is signed by OpenBSD for
distribution or abc email came from an official OpenBSD source is a good
thing. Trojaned binaries and forged emails happen. PKI can help mitigate
this.
Are you allowing the carp traffic in and out?
This is the more common fuckup I make when configuring them that has
this result. make sure the carp and pfsync traffic makes it in and
out.
while that is entirely true, I really don't see much of a point here.
actually, if I were to implement these parts now I'd make it print port
numbers only and not names - we don't print hostnames either.
but - it has been that way for more than 6 years. I don't see a good
reason to change
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do
any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only
perpetuated stupidity..
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-31 12:21]:
Probably Bad things.
Oh-oh... I increased it to 2 minutes. Thing are a bit better now.
Shouldn't be. What rev of openbsd are you running this spamd box on?
I run it on a single ide drive, I'm probably bigger than your site.
* RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-11 22:39]:
It seems that the migrated database works but new entries go on the end
- no SORT of order, and SPAMTRAP entries (that I entered using a
script) ended up showing in two bunches in the midst of other unordered
entries.
My question is: Is this
* Adrian Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-01 11:22]:
This thread is the first I have heard of him. Who is (or was) he?
A.
How unbelievably [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can't even have the decency to
google his
name before you spout your ignorance here, in an incredibly
insensitive manner.
* Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-31 08:40]:
On 10/31/07, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't need a list. They could already have started coding. Yet
we see how few people actually do start coding. Instead, they choose
to write in english...
How can we get
and i would suggest that the severe and prevelant attitude toward the
possibilty of poor patches or under-educated actions is the most
significant barrier to encouraging new/young developers.
No, the severe and prevelent attitude toward the possiblilty of poor
patches or
Who put the 36 hour date in there? spamd or spamlogd?
spamlogd may have done that for you. look at your syslogs
-Bob
* Claes Str?m [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 10:13]:
Hi,
When testing greylisting with synchronizing we noticed the following
strange behavior:
* Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-26 16:53]:
On 10/26/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, then, is the correct way to separate the project files of more
than 16 projects, where some users will need access to all of the
groups?
There has to be _some_ solution
I just noticed 011_openssl.patch and installed it on my 4.1 i386 system.
Does anyone have any idea to what extent I risked being hacked? If the
risk was significant, what is the best way to check if someone's been naughty?
If anyone competent is being naughty, you probably wouldn't
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Aaron wrote:
? share/man/mantest
unable to write, file adduser.8
No space left on device
and returns me to the #.
There is plenty of disk space.
Try a different cvs server:
http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#CVSROOT
Or, if you want an
Okay, well fresh from an install on my Sun X2100M2 my daughter wanted
to check it out
http://balius.com/openbsd.4.2.jpg
Ok, that's a cool picture. Thanks daniel :)
-Bob
(though i have to confess, i haven't made a donation since i upgraded
my gateway to 4.1 ... i have an excuse !!! and it was only last week.
and i will)
And this is exactly the problem. Look, you guys can quibble
all you want about awww, we should be able to make our own distros
Yes,
This time you should really let the U of A buy you one ;)
-Bob
* Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-01 23:37]:
Through mysterious circumstances, my Thinkpad T42 disappeared in the
Minneapolis airport today.
I know it went into the xray machine. I know I didn't have it
Wouldn't it be win-win if people there could buy DVD (with more data on
it, i.e. needing less downloads) and an agreement could be made that XX
$ (enough to compensate for the not-sold CDs) for each DVD sold are paid
to OpenBSD?
No, it wouldn't. The project has already contemplated
* Richard Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-27 07:49]:
In recent weeks I have seen a number of spam attempts to servers we host
that should never see them. More concisely, people are trying to send
spam by connecting to port 25 on our web servers. These connections die
on their arse because we
* Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-27 11:36]:
--- Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
greylisting does what it does. It delays the initial email
for 30 minutes or more. what you do with that 30 minutes will decide
on how effective it is for you.
In that 30
I'm not 100% certain I'm getting your idea here ... we do currently
run inbound/outbound mail on different IPs, but the problem isn't with
the connections themselves.
From the example session transcript with spamd that I posted earlier:
250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your
Oh, I'm not saying it doesn't work. What I'm saying is, greylisting
is trivial to bypass, and some spammers have figured that out.
Amazingly, most of them still haven't, which is why it still works in a
significant number of cases.
greylisting does what it does. It delays the
Lemme give you a big whack with the old cluestick guys..
Trolls only work if you *respond*.
If you don't feed it. it goes away.
Please just stop feeding the trolls.
spews has been dead for a while. this is why with
recent releases of openbsd, we don't include it in the example
files anymore - spews started taking a tack of basically
including every ISP on the planet, since only big companies
should be able to send mail. which, of course, is bullshit.
fresh pom blood perchance?
Fresh luser blood.
Non Ex Transverso Sed Deorsum...
Now, please return to discussing openbsd...
-Bob
* Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-14 02:58]:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Look to me if a corporation wanted to kill the open source, they
couldn't pick a better way to do it and here the GPL is walking right
into it! Or may be some guys are well paid to create the problem and
destroy
* Bob Beck beck [2007-09-14 08:14]:
* Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-14 02:58]:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Doesn't this simply sound like making free software developers
and users lose their freedoms and work they've authored? Who wins?
probably the people who want to sell
spamlogd not only needs to be running, but it needs to
see the connections - your pf rules need to log them correctly.
The best way to see if this is happening is to fire
off some debug level syslogging, and see if spamlogd is logging lines
for the hosts that connect in. You
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to
something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
I don't think it's worth putting my efforts into. The current
installer is about the easiest thing I have to deal with from AIX, 4
linux distributions, and FreeBSD.
As
Interesting, because I'm seeking the same. Based on sane's site and
what was at the local staples, I bought a Canon Lide 25 - however the
sane support on openbsd didn't work, better yet, if I boot to windows
to see if the thing is boned or not, trying to install the windows
driver crashes
of pain that was my vasectomy...
If I get something that works I'll let the list know.
-Bob
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Bob Beck wrote:
Interesting, because I'm seeking the same. Based on sane's site and
what was at the local staples, I bought a Canon Lide 25 - however the
sane support
My question is about using spamd to GREYTRAP, but not GREYLIST.
spamd doesn't do that. because it needs to look at the address
in order to trap. it does this offline after one delay. It is not written
to do instantaneous type trapping, because your MTA can do that.
-Bob
* snowcrash+openbsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-11 11:41]:
hi,
it does this offline after one delay
well, fair enough, then.
what, then, is the MINIMUM value of that delay?
1 minute is obviouly OK.
Nope, because it's up to the client (the other end) how
fast he retries.
[ A copy of this is going to the linux kernel mailing list, regarding the
recent license modifications to reyk's files]
Oh, and if you look at the OpenBSD CVS you see versions 4 months old
with dozens of contributions by Reyk and with:
/* $OpenBSD: ath.c,v 1.63 2007/05/09 16:41:14 reyk
As a free software user and developer, the question I have is how come
the Linux community feels that they can take the BSD code that was
reverse-engineered at OpenBSD, and put a more restrictive licence onto
it, such that there will be no possibility of the changes going back
to OpenBSD, given
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-30 13:56]:
Hi all...
What happens if we change #define DB_SCAN_INTERVAL 60 to 600 in
/usr/src/libexec/spamd/grey.h?
Probably Bad things.
Sorry, I'm no C coder...
Basically we just want to spread out table scans for now until we get
new
The OpenBSD Foundation is pleased to announce today it has completed
its organization as a Canadian federal non-profit corporation and is
ready for public interaction.
The OpenBSD Foundation has been formed for the purpose of supporting
the OpenBSD project, and related projects such as
You are setting the user, not the login class.
You have made a login class _mysql in /etc/login.conf,
but it looks like you may not have that as user _mysql's default
login class. You need to either change user _mysql to be in the
_mysql login class by default, (hint, chfn _mysql
101 - 200 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
