Re: hardware

On 4/20/23 17:12, Katherine Mcmillan wrote: According to ChatGPT, unfortunately, it doesn't work on plants. Me to ChatGPT: Can I run OpenBSD on my ficus? ChatGPT: No, it is not possible to run OpenBSD on a ficus plant. OpenBSD is an operating system designed to run on computer hardware, not

Re: dns priority from different network connections - or disabling?

On 4/12/23 20:20, Theo de Raadt wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-04-11, Theo de Raadt wrote: Kaya Saman wrote: This somehow is overriding my resolv.conf file; another words the information is *not* being used from resolv.conf and is instead being used from the ipcp negotiation

Re: dns priority from different network connections - or disabling?

Thanks Stu, and everyone else who responded :-) On 4/11/23 09:01, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-04-10, Kaya Saman wrote: On 4/10/23 16:24, Daniele B. wrote: Apr 10, 2023 12:52:22 Kaya Saman : how do I override OpenBSD's behavior to explicitly not use the dns servers obtained through

Re: dns priority from different network connections - or disabling?

On 4/10/23 16:24, Daniele B. wrote: Apr 10, 2023 12:52:22 Kaya Saman : how do I override OpenBSD's behavior to explicitly not use the dns servers obtained through ipcp but instead use the ones form the resolv.conf file? My solution both for security reasons (I'm using unbound

Re: dns priority from different network connections - or disabling?

On 4/10/23 11:40, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:26:22AM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, I'll ask the second question first as it might be easier to implement... Currently I have found that the dns servers specified in the resolv.conf file are not being used. Instead my

dns priority from different network connections - or disabling?

Hi, I'll ask the second question first as it might be easier to implement... Currently I have found that the dns servers specified in the resolv.conf file are not being used. Instead my machine is prioritizing the ISP obtained servers from the ipcp protocol through the kernel ppp service.

Re: rdomains finally working!!

On 4/3/23 11:25, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 10:53:26AM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: Hey guys, ... Taking an excerpt from the website I was following: https://www.packetmischief.ca/2011/09/20/virtualizing-the-openbsd-routing-table/ Citing: Creating a loopback interface

rdomains finally working!!

Hey guys, I can't spend too much time right now in writing up what I have done right now as I'm just about to head out of town to a local nature reserve in order to clear my head, but basically things are working!! At this stage with such limited documentation on the topic I wonder if I

Fwd: Understanding PF behavior

Well... somehow I managed to get inter rdomain forwarding. I have no idea how...? I think things started to work when I changed this statement in PF: block log on rdomain 0 from "block log" Right now I can only communicate between rdomain 2 and rdomain 0. I moved my ISP-B interface

Understanding PF behavior

Hi guys, So far I have spent a week on this and I feel like I'm not progressing, now I just feel like I'm banging against a brick wall. To start with, I managed to send icmp echos over my WAN link through ISP-B within the same routing domain rdomain 2. I then started looking at

Re: Static default route for a subnet

On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote: Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's? At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the end of the NAT rule... That is for _changing_ rtable; if the

Re: Static default route for a subnet

On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote: Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's? At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the end of the NAT rule... That is for _changing_ rtable; if the

Re: Static default route for a subnet

On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote: Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's? At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the end of the NAT rule... That is for _changing_ rtable; if the

Re: Static default route for a subnet

Thanks Stuart! On 3/28/23 16:19, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote: On my WAN vlan for what I am going to call ISP-B, as ISP-A is existing for a long time. What I'm trying to do right now is set this as a default gateway for a particular subnet. There's no such thing

Static default route for a subnet

Hi again, so my shiny new fiber has been installed yesterday and currently I can ping the gateway IP address but not much more. It was interesting as they gave me this whole subnet and told me I get a gateway address. What they should have said to eliminate my confusion was that there is

Re: Possible to handle fiber WAN connection with OpenBSD using PCIe card?

On 3/25/23 09:33, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-24, Kaya Saman wrote: Just responding to this for completeness as I have some more information on my side On 3/24/23 07:21, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-23, Kaya Saman wrote: Unfortunately I haven't been well for a long time

Re: Possible to handle fiber WAN connection with OpenBSD using PCIe card?

Just responding to this for completeness as I have some more information on my side On 3/24/23 07:21, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2023-03-23, Kaya Saman wrote: Unfortunately I haven't been well for a long time hence the delay in upgrade and at first found it a little difficult but the way

Possible to handle fiber WAN connection with OpenBSD using PCIe card?

Hi everyone, it's been a long time since I've posted here and in the meantime I have just upgraded from 7.0-current to 7.3-beta through sysupgrade which is amazing! Thanks so much for all the hard work and effort put in to the tool!! Unfortunately I haven't been well for a long time hence

Re: NIC Port L2 Switching capability

Thanks Stuart! On 1/26/21 11:36 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2021-01-25, Kaya Saman wrote: Thanks a lot Tom for your response. Perhaps I wasn't quite clear in what I am trying to achieve? When I say trunk, I meant from a switch perspective as in a 802.1Q trunk port on a switch. I

Re: NIC Port L2 Switching capability

the best On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 22:06, Kaya Saman <mailto:kayasa...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if it's possible to get OpenBSD to make the NIC ports act like a layer 2 switch? I made a quick test in VirtualBox (unfortunately I don't have any bare

NIC Port L2 Switching capability

Hi, I'm wondering if it's possible to get OpenBSD to make the NIC ports act like a layer 2 switch? I made a quick test in VirtualBox (unfortunately I don't have any bare bones systems free to test with) and tried the following: create two systems, one called router , the other called

Re: Any idea/suggestion for old Cisco router to be use running OpenBSD current for WG?

On 6/24/20 11:58 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2020-06-23, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Have a look through https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/embedded/servers / https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/embedded/rackmount and you'll find quite a few things that give the perception "solid custom

Re: Any idea/suggestion for old Cisco router to be use running OpenBSD current for WG?

, but for fell comfortable. Call it marketing bullshit, because that's exactly what it is! (; Daniel On 6/23/20 12:37 PM, Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, I totally understand the position you're in and sympathize. I've never heard of Cisco routers being able to run OpenBSD though IOS is based on BSD as far

Re: Any idea/suggestion for old Cisco router to be use running OpenBSD current for WG?

Hi, I totally understand the position you're in and sympathize. I've never heard of Cisco routers being able to run OpenBSD though IOS is based on BSD as far as I'm aware. Not a direct solution to your use case but you could always run a small mini-itx or SBC system behind the Cisco router. You

npppd docs for tun change to pppac

Hi, I just updated my system from 6.6 (old current) to 6.7 (current) which went through fine. I realized that the npppd setup I had stopped working. Something that threw me off in the man pages was the lingering reference to the old tun interface which has since been reworked to pppac.

Re: Networking/pf question, I am not sure ?

On 5/10/20 2:12 PM, Kaya Saman wrote: On 5/10/20 2:04 PM, Tom Smyth wrote: Hello Clarence, you would need to provide some more information about your setup, ip addresses on interfaces , what is your pf.conf etc... In your experia ( I believe they are android) you can download the  hurricane

Re: Networking/pf question, I am not sure ?

On 5/10/20 2:04 PM, Tom Smyth wrote: Hello Clarence, you would need to provide some more information about your setup, ip addresses on interfaces , what is your pf.conf etc... In your experia ( I believe they are android) you can download the hurricane electric network tools (HE network

Re: setup authoritative DNS for myself with nsd + unbound

It really depends on what you want/need. If you would like to host your own DNS servers, then multi location is a good idea: Example: Master NS1 in LA and Slave NS2 in Miami. I have no idea about GoDiddy but my US based domain hosting company let's me specify my own ns servers, as their

Re: [OT?] I have 4 IPs. How is outbound IP selected, say run lynx URL on server?

On 11/30/18 8:31 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: I'm just curious. Is there a default method to select on this? Random? Can I control this somehow? It's clear how everything else selects IP, but I just wanted to know in case that ever mattered, say one of my IPs were blocked. And I wanted to be sure

Re: With all this CPU/hardware mess, any advice on what to use for an organization?

On 11/20/18 8:11 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: On 11/20/18 11:43, Chris Bennett wrote: Unfortunately, if you have performance requirements, your choices are AMD and Intel. Older Intel and AMD chips aren't getting any support to deal

Re: Routing stops after ipsec/gre tunnel activates

On 10/1/18 4:36 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:16:48PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: On 10/1/18 4:12 PM, Janne Johansson wrote: Den mån 1 okt. 2018 kl 16:56 skrev Kaya Saman mailto:kayasa...@gmail.com>>: Hi, I've got an issue where something strange is hap

Re: Routing stops after ipsec/gre tunnel activates

On 10/1/18 4:36 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:16:48PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: On 10/1/18 4:12 PM, Janne Johansson wrote: Den mån 1 okt. 2018 kl 16:56 skrev Kaya Saman mailto:kayasa...@gmail.com>>: Hi, I've got an issue where something strange is hap

Re: Routing stops after ipsec/gre tunnel activates

On 10/1/18 4:12 PM, Janne Johansson wrote: Den mån 1 okt. 2018 kl 16:56 skrev Kaya Saman <mailto:kayasa...@gmail.com>>: Hi, I've got an issue where something strange is happening with the routing table after establishing an ipsec connection it's q

Routing stops after ipsec/gre tunnel activates

Hi, I've got an issue where something strange is happening with the routing table after establishing an ipsec connection it's quite hard to describe but what happens is that the tunnel establishes then routing goes down completely. The netstat -r command when run on the router just

Re: Running your own mail server

and Rainloop work well enough and still are actively maintained. I do not know how well those other ones you listed work. Alternatively, direct your users to some clear and well-written instructions that would allow them to configure a mail client of their choice. Best wishes, Duncan On 09/08/18 16:39, Kaya

Re: Running your own mail server

On 9/9/18 5:54 PM, Ken M wrote: On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:49:31PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: In a nutshell, monitoring email is concentrating on what is really likely to be one of the less problematic areas. The others, which IMO are MUCH more likely to be involved if any problems do

Re: Running your own mail server

On 9/9/18 5:42 PM, Ken M wrote: On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:24:38AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: While you should not take technical advice on mail servers from me, I've raised two kids to adulthood with a 17 year old to go, and had almost 200 foster children. The impedance mismatch you

Re: Running your own mail server

On 9/8/18 6:01 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: [snip] IMHO, I would skip using partially insecure OS's like Linux. These are your kids! Of course security at the OS level is important but also a lot of work must be done around in the infrastructure area too for security... running a good IDS

Re: Running your own mail server

I agree here! Basically you would need a few components: MTA / MDA / MUA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_transfer_agent One way to do it would be something like: Postfix / Courier IMAP / Then bolt something like SquirrelMail on top for web UI client There are many ways to

Re: New laptop recommendations

I couldn't say for the compatibility with OpenBSD though I have read other people running on them, but how about Lenovo?? I've got an X220 which I run a Linux distro on which I'm really happy with though the i7 CPU does seem to overheat for some reason, though I seem to have this issue with

Re: Bandwidth Queuing on Asymmetrical Connections?

Hi Jordan, I ask this a while back too and many thanks to Stuart Henderson who might chime in? Basically the queuing is done on the outbound interface. So when you make your rules if you have 15Mbs upstream bandwidth then that is where you do the queuing. See the OBSD and PF manual for how

Re: pfstat not generating graphs after upgrading to -current

On 02/15/18 07:48, Glenn Faustino wrote: After deleting and installing pfstat it now works, thanks guys! Feb 15 14:26:37 OpenBSD pkg_delete: Removed pfstat-2.5p1 Feb 15 14:27:02 OpenBSD pkg_add: Added pfstat-2.5p1 $ doas pfstat -q -d /var/db/pfstat.db $ Regards, Glenn Hi, I'm

Re: pfstat and queueing

On 02/15/2018 01:34 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018/02/15 13:27, Kaya Saman wrote: On 02/15/2018 12:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018-02-15, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: does queueing still function with pfstat? As far as I'm aware it still uses the old altq

Re: pfstat and queueing

On 02/15/2018 12:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018-02-15, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: does queueing still function with pfstat? As far as I'm aware it still uses the old altq method which has long been abandoned. you're correct, pfstat hasn't been updated to follow c

pfstat and queueing

Hi, does queueing still function with pfstat? As far as I'm aware it still uses the old altq method which has long been abandoned. It would be great if pfstat would graph queues again but the config example in: /usr/local/share/examples/pfstat/pfstat.conf still has the old altq style?

Re: pfstat not generating graphs after upgrading to -current

On 02/15/2018 06:39 AM, Glenn Faustino wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Sebastien Marie wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:29:23AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018-02-14, Glenn Faustino wrote: Hi, Did you upgrade your packages

Dansguardian port

Hi, I've got the Dansguardian port installed and it still seems to be part of the packages list too. https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/packa ges/amd64/ However, I think that the actual software isn't maintained anymore as it's original home: http://dansguardian.org/ has vanished. There

Re: Using queueing on asynchronous interface

On 07/27/2017 05:30 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2017-07-26, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] I'm finding that I don't really need much in the way of "downstream" queueing though. It might be needed in special cases but using mikeb's shiny new fq-codel code

Re: Using queueing on asynchronous interface

[snip] I'm finding that I don't really need much in the way of "downstream" queueing though. It might be needed in special cases but using mikeb's shiny new fq-codel code in -current, one single queue definition on the upstream interface is keeping traffic flowing nicely. queue hfsq-em1 on em1

Re: Using queueing on asynchronous interface

Many thanks Stuart! On 07/26/2017 11:37 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2017-07-25, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: My goal is to use a different queue for up/down were I can change the max bandwidth accordingly. Queuing is done outbound, your "in" queu

Using queueing on asynchronous interface

Hi, I'm trying to setup packet queueing on a WAN interface with 80Mb/s downstream bandwidth and 20Mb/s upstream bandwidth. The first point of call of course is the PF manual: https://man.openbsd.org/pf.conf.5 Then had a look to see what others had issues with and solutions suggested:

Re: xntp mlockall issue patched yet?

On 07/07/2017 10:11 PM, Allan Streib wrote: Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> writes: I'm running current (6.1 GENERIC.MP#99 amd64) and keep getting this message when trying to start ntp from @ports: ntpd 4.2.8p10@1.3728-o Fri Jun 2 02:18:56 UTC 2017 (1): Starting mlockall():

Re: xntp mlockall issue patched yet?

On 07/08/2017 12:11 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2017-07-07, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: I'm running current (6.1 GENERIC.MP#99 amd64) and keep getting this message when trying to start ntp from @ports: ntpd 4.2.8p10@1.3728-o Fri Jun 2 02:18:56 UTC 2017 (1): St

xntp mlockall issue patched yet?

Hi, found this posting back from 2013 and wondering if there was ever a commit on the proposed patch? http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-mlockall-problem-in-OpenBSD-5-2-td166000.html I'm running current (6.1 GENERIC.MP#99 amd64) and keep getting this message when trying to

Re: FTP proxy not listing certain directories?

ervers are required to support the PASV command by RFC 1123, some do not.) Or simply attempt to use Active ftp on port 20 - though this seems to be now legacy.... ---K On 01/29/2017 04:14 PM, Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, as I have now managed to get back into my OBSD

FTP proxy not listing certain directories?

Hi, as I have now managed to get back into my OBSD system I have tested ftp again from clients yet still even with the recent upgrade I seem to be unable to list certain directories?? I have checked the option flags for ftpproxy (man ftpproxy) however, couldn't find anything of help.

Re: isakmpd quits out after running ipsec on CURRENT

On 12/03/2014 07:39 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2014-12-03, Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote: This could be the bug fixed in src/sbin/isakmpd/ui.c rev 1.56. Check your system logs for isakmpd: backwards memcpy. It may not be that change, since it was only committed two days

Re: isakmpd quits out after running ipsec on CURRENT

On 12/04/2014 04:28 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:29, Kaya Saman wrote: On 12/03/2014 07:39 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2014-12-03, Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote: This could be the bug fixed in src/sbin/isakmpd/ui.c rev 1.56. Check your system logs

isakmpd quits out after running ipsec on CURRENT

Hi, for some reason, this seems to have been for a while now; isakmpd will simply quit running after initiating: ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf Starting isakmpd manually with flags -Kdv doesn't give any indication as to what might be causing the service to crash or segfault and nothing is

Re: Dansguardian not working after updating OBSD Current

in the manual. Though I did find a copy here: http://ss64.com/bash/ulimit.html :-) So thanks Philip, looks like you saved my day twice! Regards, Kaya On 09/17/2014 03:55 AM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure what

Re: Dansguardian not working after updating OBSD Current

On 09/17/2014 03:32 PM, Stefan Olsson wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:08:48 +0100 From: kayasa...@gmail.com Just a quick observation, not sure if by design or other but ulimit doesn't seem to have a man page? -It is a ksh builtin. man ksh -It would be

Re: Dansguardian not working after updating OBSD Current

On 09/17/2014 03:34 PM, Alexander Hall wrote: On September 17, 2014 4:08:48 PM CEST, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so this is just a quick follow up. Squid started dying too, checking the logs showed not enough file descriptors. After looking at both /etc/login.conf openfiles-cur

Dansguardian not working after updating OBSD Current

Hi, I'm not sure what happened but after updating OpenBSD today, then updating the installed packages Dansguardian seems to not be working. My OpenBSD version is: 5.6 GENERIC.MP#376 amd64 as stated just been updated today. then used: pkg_add -vui to update the packages. Just checking

Re: Dansguardian not working after updating OBSD Current

On 09/17/2014 03:55 AM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure what happened but after updating OpenBSD today, then updating the installed packages Dansguardian seems to not be working. ... The only error in the logs

Re: adsl card advice

On 04/25/2014 11:32 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: [...] About separate adsl router I think they are pretty unsafe and very easy download the firmware from the vendor site, hack it and flash the device. And all the home adsl router u can find are linux based with all security problems that linux

Re: High Fan Speed in Current 5.5

On 04/20/2014 11:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014-04-19, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: I hope someone can help me with this... For some reason my fans are spinning up at 3000RPM and making a lot of noise. I have a similar chassis m/b combo running FreeBSD 10 which runs almost

Re: High Fan Speed in Current 5.5

On 04/20/2014 03:16 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/04/20 15:11, Kaya Saman wrote: On 04/20/2014 11:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014-04-19, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: I hope someone can help me with this... For some reason my fans are spinning up at 3000RPM and making

Re: High Fan Speed in Current 5.5

On 04/20/2014 03:16 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/04/20 15:11, Kaya Saman wrote: On 04/20/2014 11:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014-04-19, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: I hope someone can help me with this... For some reason my fans are spinning up at 3000RPM and making

Re: High Fan Speed in Current 5.5

On 04/20/2014 03:56 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/04/20 15:49, Kaya Saman wrote: On 04/20/2014 03:16 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/04/20 15:11, Kaya Saman wrote: On 04/20/2014 11:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014-04-19, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: I hope someone

High Fan Speed in Current 5.5

Hi, I hope someone can help me with this... For some reason my fans are spinning up at 3000RPM and making a lot of noise. I have a similar chassis m/b combo running FreeBSD 10 which runs almost silent. The processor usage on this machine isn't very high at all and is even being

Android 4.4 and L2TP/IPSEC VPN

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone has had any experience with VPN and Android 4.4?? I used to use OpenVPN with versions 4.1 through 4.3 however, 4.4 apparently broke the tun interface so the app doesn't work now. As I need vpn access I configured ipsec and npppd however, I keep getting these errors

Re: Network appliance recomendation.

On 08/10/2013 06:01 PM, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote: On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Maurice Janssen maur...@z74.net wrote: On 08/09/13 17:05, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote: Hi folks. Currently I have a Wireless network serving in my town using a small form factor (mini-itx) PC with

Re: pppoe(4) slow for Annex M DSL connection

On 11/01/2012 11:12 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: On 31/10/2012 18:49, Kaya Saman wrote: I've just got my dsl line reprovisioned for Annex M compatibility and the line speed showing currently on the modem is 20Mbps downstream with 2Mbps upstream. Upon the reprovisioning I got ask to do a speed

pppoe(4) slow for Annex M DSL connection

Hi, I've just got my dsl line reprovisioned for Annex M compatibility and the line speed showing currently on the modem is 20Mbps downstream with 2Mbps upstream. Upon the reprovisioning I got ask to do a speed test by my ISP and only ~5Mbps was shown for downstream while upstream was shown

Re: question_about_OpenBSD_on_ADSL_modems/routers

I think this is what you might be looking for: http://www.rocksolidelectronics.com/pages/products.php Not sure where you are based but if in Europe then Linitx can help you is in the UK however. http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=148 Regards, Kaya On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:47

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/12/2012 09:59 AM, Peter Hessler wrote: On 2012 Mar 12 (Mon) at 00:44:15 + (+), Kaya Saman wrote: :Would it not just be easier and cleaner to create a new list for :newbies? That way the more advanced stuff could be taken care of on :this list and only people willing to help others

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/12/2012 10:50 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2012-03-11, Kaya Samankayasa...@gmail.com wrote: Now I do know these without even needing to read the documentation... however even **IF** I tried to compile on one of those platforms which I do all the time I never need to adjust system

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/12/2012 11:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2012-03-11, Kaya Samankayasa...@gmail.com wrote: Well in mean time I found this: http://openports.se/devel/metaauto although I don't think it's installed as **find** didn't come up with anything. pkg_info | grep metaauto Also look at

Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest NTOP version 4.1.0 on OpenBSD RELEASE 5.0 x64 but am running into issues regarding automake and autoconfig. Basically I installed: automake-1.11.1p2 autoconf-2.67 The install script comes up saying this: # ./autogen.sh Starting ntop automatic

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/11/2012 08:10 PM, Remco wrote: Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest NTOP version 4.1.0 on OpenBSD RELEASE 5.0 x64 but am running into issues regarding automake and autoconfig. Basically I installed: automake-1.11.1p2 autoconf-2.67 The install script comes up

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/11/2012 08:20 PM, Marc Espie wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:42:43PM +, Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest NTOP version 4.1.0 on OpenBSD RELEASE 5.0 x64 but am running into issues regarding automake and autoconfig. Basically I installed: automake-1.11.1p2

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/11/2012 08:20 PM, Marc Espie wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:42:43PM +, Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest NTOP version 4.1.0 on OpenBSD RELEASE 5.0 x64 but am running into issues regarding automake and autoconfig. Basically I installed: automake-1.11.1p2

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/11/2012 08:20 PM, Marc Espie wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:42:43PM +, Kaya Saman wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest NTOP version 4.1.0 on OpenBSD RELEASE 5.0 x64 but am running into issues regarding automake and autoconfig. Basically I installed: automake-1.11.1p2

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/11/2012 10:34 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012, Kaya Saman wrote: try: automake --version autoconf --version The messages should be self-explanatory if you didn't define certain environment variables, e.g., I have this in my environment: automake --version autoconf

Re: Which automake and autoconfig versions to compile NTOP v4?

On 03/12/2012 12:21 AM, hex wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:48:24PM +, Kaya Saman wrote: On 03/11/2012 10:34 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012, Kaya Saman wrote: try: automake --version autoconf --version The messages should be self-explanatory if you didn't define

Re: Snappy Answers to Stupid Questions - WTF?

On 03/10/2012 08:27 AM, Lars wrote: Kaya Saman wrote: On 03/09/2012 10:35 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote: Brett wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 09:12:11AM +1100: I noticed and think its a great title, because it would never be approved by a marketing department. See, Nick *is* the honorary marketing

Re: Request for a new list: trolling

On 03/10/2012 01:33 PM, 0xAAA wrote: It is quite interesting that any trolling message gets more attention than a real, OpenBSD related problem (view the threads of the stupid guy which cant read installation instructions...) It could be just that people need to let off steam once in a

Re: Snappy Answers to Stupid Questions - WTF?

On 03/09/2012 10:35 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote: Brett wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 09:12:11AM +1100: I noticed and think its a great title, because it would never be approved by a marketing department. See, Nick *is* the honorary marketing department. Er... well... among other functions. (He is

ISAKMP Phase-2 not completing with Cisco ISR - IPSEC over GRE

Hi, I am trying to create a VPN between my OpenBSD test box running in a Virtual Box instance, with bridged interface to my NIC and my Cisco 857 router. I am getting these error messages in /var/log/messages: Mar 5 21:24:31 OpenBSD isakmpd[27722]: dropped message from 192.168.0.1

Monitoring PF rules on egress interface not showing pass definitions

Hi, I created a virtual instance of OpenBSD 5.0 x64 RELEASE edition using VirtualBox and set it up to be used as router/gateway with NAT. Taking this: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/example1.html as an example for practically getting to know packet filter which I've never used before and get

Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions

On 02/28/2012 01:57 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: I also would like to know if anyone knows of any ADSL2+ Annex M standard PCI (/x/) based modem card that I can use to connect to my ISP with instead of using an external device? So far in my search I came across this:

Router project on OpenBSD questions

Hi, this is my first posting here :-) I have currently only used OpenBSD as a test vector setup on VirtualBox and 2x Sun Fire V240's as a DNS server (master/slave) using Bind9. So basically in short am an OpenBSD newbee :-) Ok so here goes; I've been using FreeBSD for around 3+ years now

Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions

snip Good luck Many thanks Christiano for such a quick and comprehensive response :-) Regards, Kaya

Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions

So I would like to build a router out of a Quad Core Xeon system. I've selected the hardware for it already and the software barring the base OS. You want the highest cache and highest frequency cpu you can find. MP will not help you with routing performance at all. Something like this:

Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions

With this though I'm betting that a Core2Quad Q8400s CPU (which I currently run on a FreeBSD based Mini-NAS mainframe) will be more powerful then any Cisco SMB based router? - I can see it being more powerful then my 8xx or 18xx series in anycase! I don't know cisco, it's all about how much