Manufactures use the 'giga' prefix in the International System meaning.
That said, 1Gb would be 10^9 = 1,000,000,000 bytes.
Computer programmers, OS and all around computer chit-chat use the
prefix 'giga' to refer 2^30 = 1,073,741,824 bytes.
IEC recommends calling this GiB, but it's
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Gracia Garallar
danie...@electronicagracia.com wrote:
Manufactures use the 'giga' prefix in the International System meaning. That
said, 1Gb would be 10^9 = 1,000,000,000 bytes.
Computer programmers, OS and all around computer chit-chat use the prefix
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:35:18PM +0700, Edho P Arief wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Gracia Garallar
danie...@electronicagracia.com wrote:
Manufactures use the 'giga' prefix in the International System meaning. That
said, 1Gb would be 10^9 = 1,000,000,000 bytes.
Computer
There are many stupid ideas in other operating systems, I
don't see why we should be required to implement them.
Yeah, and the discussion of my ass is a more productive discussion
than talking about making df display marketing gigabytes
That'll happen in openbsd right after we switch the
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
There are many stupid ideas in other operating systems, I
don't see why we should be required to implement them.
Yeah, and the discussion of my ass is a more productive discussion
than talking about making df display marketing
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
There are many stupid ideas in other operating systems, I
don't see why we should be required to implement them.
Yeah, and the discussion of my ass is a more productive discussion
than talking about making df display marketing
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:28:00AM +0100, Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote:
Computer programmers, OS and all around computer chit-chat use the
prefix 'giga' to refer 2^30 = 1,073,741,824 bytes.
IEC recommends calling this GiB, but it's uncommon.
Today, you could assume safely only
bits are absolute.
this discussion should take a turn to beck's ass again.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:29:54PM +0100, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:28:00AM +0100, Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote:
Computer programmers, OS and all around computer chit-chat use the
prefix
hi all, lately, i obtained a seagate 200g(wd1) harddisk from my elder
brother, after i disklabel, newfs and mount the disk. only 174g is
shown as available, in windows(through samba), said 9.16g already been
used. is there any way i can claim those space back? much thanks!
# disklabel wd1
#
Two words: Filesystem Overhead.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Jennifer Ma jen.ma1...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all, lately, i obtained a seagate 200g(wd1) harddisk from my elder
brother, after i disklabel, newfs and mount the disk. only 174g is
shown as available, in windows(through samba),
Hi Jennifer,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:59:01PM +0800, Jennifer Ma wrote:
| 16 partitions:
| #size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
| a:390721905 63 4.2BSD 2048 163841
| c:3907219680 unused
|
|
| # df -h
| #
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:59:01 +0800
Jennifer Ma jen.ma1...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all, lately, i obtained a seagate 200g(wd1) harddisk from my elder
brother, after i disklabel, newfs and mount the disk. only 174g is
shown as available, in windows(through samba), said 9.16g already been
used. is
On 28 Oct 2009 at 14:59, Jennifer Ma wrote:
hi all, lately, i obtained a seagate 200g(wd1) harddisk from my elder
brother, after i disklabel, newfs and mount the disk. only 174g is
shown as available, in windows(through samba), said 9.16g already been
used. is there any way i can claim
13 matches
Mail list logo
