Re: 5.2 vs 5.1

2012-12-31 Thread Robert Connolly
On 12/30/12 05:51, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:01:41AM +, J Boehm wrote: I have recently tried out 5.2 on a slightly dated hardware (nvidia based, Athlon, 500MB Ram). Working with Seamonkey or Xombrero seems to be slow, pages load reluctantly in 5.2. Videos on

Re: 5.2 vs 5.1

2012-12-31 Thread Brad Smith
- Original message - On 12/30/12 05:51, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:01:41AM +, J Boehm wrote: I have recently tried out 5.2 on a slightly dated hardware (nvidia based, Athlon, 500MB Ram). Working with Seamonkey or Xombrero seems to be slow, pages

5.2 vs 5.1

2012-12-30 Thread J Boehm
I have recently tried out 5.2 on a slightly dated hardware (nvidia based, Athlon, 500MB Ram). Working with Seamonkey or Xombrero seems to be slow, pages load reluctantly in 5.2. Videos on Youtube are almost impossible to view. I tried changing settings in pf, cache, network cards etc but had to go

Re: 5.2 vs 5.1

2012-12-30 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:01:41AM +, J Boehm wrote: I have recently tried out 5.2 on a slightly dated hardware (nvidia based, Athlon, 500MB Ram). Working with Seamonkey or Xombrero seems to be slow, pages load reluctantly in 5.2. Videos on Youtube are almost impossible to view. I tried