Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-10 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Marc Balmer said that If you care for security, go with the one in base. Huge and highly loaded websites are served with it. could you give some examples please? 1.3 has some serious limitations stemming from it's overall architecture and in some

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-10 Thread Francisco Valladolid Hdez.
--- On Mon, 11/10/08, David Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: David Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ? To: Misc OpenBSD misc@openbsd.org Date: Monday, November 10, 2008, 6:45 AM i can also only recommend to stick with the one in base. i never

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-09 Thread David Schulz
: Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ? To: Francisco Valladolid Hdez. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: misc@openbsd.org Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 8:17 AM * Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote: Hi folks. I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web hosting

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-08 Thread Pereresus ne Vlezaet Buggy
On Saturday 08 November 2008 08:40:55 Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote: Hi folks. I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web hosting for a small company. Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2 include best performance compared to

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-08 Thread Marc Balmer
* Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote: Hi folks. I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web hosting for a small company. Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2 include best performance compared to 1.3 (included in base), and best

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-08 Thread raven
Francisco Valladolid Hdez. ha scritto: Hi folks. I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web hosting for a small company. Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2 include best performance compared to 1.3 (included in base), and best

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-08 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hi! On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: Keep in mind that the Webserver in base has seen a lot of security and other improvements like chroot() by default etc. It is not a stock 1.3 Apache, it is only based on Apache 1.3. Apache 2 in ports was only imported to make it

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-08 Thread Francisco Valladolid Hdez.
--- On Sat, 11/8/08, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ? To: Francisco Valladolid Hdez. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: misc@openbsd.org Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 8:17 AM * Francisco Valladolid Hdez

Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

2008-11-07 Thread Francisco Valladolid Hdez.
Hi folks. I need a recomendation for using one or other web server for a shared web hosting for a small company. Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch that Apache 2 include best performance compared to 1.3 (included in base), and best reverse proxy for dynamic web sites.