On 2014-10-08, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
* Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org [2014-10-05 22:49]:
Normal PF logging isn't particularly well-suited to CGNAT-type requirements,
in order to record both the internal address and the nat mapping you need
to log both the inbound
* Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org [2014-10-05 22:49]:
Normal PF logging isn't particularly well-suited to CGNAT-type requirements,
in order to record both the internal address and the nat mapping you need
to log both the inbound and outbound packets and piece it together from the
two
On 03/10/14 19:07, Russell Sutherland wrote:
I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
There are a few issues for which I would
On 2014-10-03, Russell Sutherland russell.sutherl...@utoronto.ca wrote:
I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
There are a few
I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
There are a few issues for which I would like to get some input for those
using pf for NAT
5 matches
Mail list logo
