Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-09 Thread Alface Voadora
2009/3/9 Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know about any installed firewall cluster that has pf+carp+pfsync working along with ALTQ on a multi-gigabit configuration with an acceptable performance?

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-08 Thread Alface Voadora
could you point me to a post that discusses the set pf + pfsync + carp + ALTQ on gigabit networks? My problem is the inclusion of the ALTQ into the configuration. If you can answer me as quick as you replied with the obvious link from your last email I would be very appreciated. 2009/3/7

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-08 Thread Alface Voadora
Thanks, but stating the obvious is not very helpful. Do you know about any installed firewall cluster that has pf+carp+pfsync working along with ALTQ on a multi-gigabit configuration with an acceptable performance? Before your wise answer and my initial question to the list I found the below

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-08 Thread SJP Lists
2009/3/9 Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com: Thanks, but stating the obvious is not very helpful. And failing to state how and what you researched is not helpful to people who might be interested in helping you. A consequence of that is that others need to state the obvious since they

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-08 Thread Alface Voadora
Please accept my apologies for the unfair and incorrect way I replied to you and to the list. My main doubt in the configuration relates with the ability of ALTQ being able to cope with a multi-gigabit throughput. 2009/3/9 SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net 2009/3/9 Alface Voadora

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-08 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:08:54AM +0100, Alface Voadora wrote: Please accept my apologies for the unfair and incorrect way I replied to you and to the list. My main doubt in the configuration relates with the ability of ALTQ being able to cope with a multi-gigabit throughput. Yes.

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-08 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know about any installed firewall cluster that has pf+carp+pfsync working along with ALTQ on a multi-gigabit configuration with an acceptable performance? how many gigabits is multi-gigabit? 2, 10, 400?

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-03-07 Thread Alface Voadora
Could you please point me to one of the hundreds of this kind of installs in the archives? I would be very appreciated. Thanks 2009/2/17 Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com hundreds! OK!! thanks!! 2009/2/16 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de * Alface Voadora

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-02-17 Thread Alface Voadora
hundreds! OK!! thanks!! 2009/2/16 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de * Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com [2009-02-08 21:37]: Did someone implement this kind of system before? Is it performing well? Is it impossible at all? you'd find hundreds of these kind of installs if

Re: PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-02-16 Thread Henning Brauer
* Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com [2009-02-08 21:37]: Did someone implement this kind of system before? Is it performing well? Is it impossible at all? you'd find hundreds of these kind of installs if you searched the list archives. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de,

PF firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit link

2009-02-08 Thread Alface Voadora
Hi all, in order to put in place a firewall system capable of handling a multi-gigabit connection, my company is also considering OpenBSD. I've been using it for my firewall setups since OpenBSD 3.5, but I have no experience on how will it perform on a multi-gigabit link. My company already uses