On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Dag Richards wrote:
Since reporting this problem I have tried running both systems on one switch,
and performed a kernel and userland build from stable.
The behavior is unchanged in both cases.
help? Am I really that stupid? This was working on 3.9
Dag Richards
Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
Make sure your addresses are in sync... number of addresses and the
netmask are different.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Dag Richards wrote:
inet 10.120.10.50 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.120.10.255
inet 10.120.10.50 netmask 0xff00 broadcast
Since reporting this problem I have tried running both systems on one
switch, and performed a kernel and userland build from stable.
The behavior is unchanged in both cases.
help? Am I really that stupid? This was working on 3.9
Dag Richards wrote:
Two systems running 4.0 GENERIC#1107 i386
On 2007/03/12 18:50, Dag Richards wrote:
insists on being master. I can ifconfig the desired slave to backup
state but after a couple of seconds it pops back to master.
how do you tell the state, ifconfig(8)? if so, try
--- Quoting Dag Richards on 2007/03/12 at 18:50 -0700:
Two systems running 4.0 GENERIC#1107 i386 on bge drivers.
They are being used as vpn servers
They are each jacked to their own cisco 2950. The switches are connected
with to each other xover cables. Each host can see the others carp
Joel Knight wrote:
--- Quoting Dag Richards on 2007/03/12 at 18:50 -0700:
Two systems running 4.0 GENERIC#1107 i386 on bge drivers.
They are being used as vpn servers
They are each jacked to their own cisco 2950. The switches are connected
with to each other xover cables. Each host can see
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/03/12 18:50, Dag Richards wrote:
insists on being master. I can ifconfig the desired slave to backup
state but after a couple of seconds it pops back to master.
how do you tell the state, ifconfig(8)? if so, try
yes precisely
7 matches
Mail list logo
