Re: Removing pf_pool

2010-01-13 Thread Pascal Lalonde
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:58:30PM +0900, Ryan McBride wrote: My first thought is to wonder why you're not running with a symmetrical cluster. But I realise that we are not always in control of such things, and one of PFs functions is to get help people work around bad network design. Right

Re: Removing pf_pool

2010-01-13 Thread Chris Dukes
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:11:54PM -0500, Pascal Lalonde wrote: [SNEEP] Err, have you considered looking at relayd for this and make the decision to punt to the lower powered boxes based off of check http or check script. There are plenty of knobs to tweak. -- Chris Dukes

Removing pf_pool

2010-01-12 Thread Pascal Lalonde
I just caught the following from openbsd-cvs: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=126326657232193w=2 If my understanding is correct, this means that it will become impossible to emulate weighted round robin with constructs like the one below, since duplicate IPs will be flattened once converted to

Re: Removing pf_pool

2010-01-12 Thread Ryan McBride
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:11:54PM -0500, Pascal Lalonde wrote: I just caught the following from openbsd-cvs: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=126326657232193w=2 If my understanding is correct, this means that it will become impossible to emulate weighted round robin with constructs like