Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Never mind no one verifying any of the keys or anything else that SSL
spits out. I am talking to you firefox!
That's pretty strange coming from the guy who complained the loudest
about recent Firefox releases that actually try to enforce the chain
of
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:45:32 + (UTC)
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Never mind no one verifying any of the keys or anything else that SSL
spits out. I am talking to you firefox!
That's pretty strange coming from the guy who complained the
Like everyone verifies SSL.. right?
2009/11/21 Samuel Baldwin recursive.for...@gmail.com:
2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
That's the nice thing about open source software; we don't have to,
because we can verify their code or
Maybe if it was readable. I'll argue it was written by the NSA to make
it unreadable for mere mortals so that they can sneak in all their
sicrit backdoors!
Never mind no one verifying any of the keys or anything else that SSL
spits out. I am talking to you firefox!
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at
Pfff, you know damn well that reading the OpenSSL doc should be enough to
get a grasp at how things work ...
Gilles
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:53:19PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Maybe if it was readable. I'll argue it was written by the NSA to make
it unreadable for mere mortals so that
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:04:59PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
OpenSSL doc
parse error
--Good luck verifying the mathematics yourself, though.
No small statement, that
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:42:48PM -0500, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
That's the nice thing about open source software;
Nick Guenther kou...@gmail.com wrote:
Like, obviously the NSA's mandate is spying
Actually, that's only half the NSA's mandate. The other half is
protecting the US government from spying.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:42:48PM -0500, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
That's the nice thing about open source software; we don't have to,
because we can verify their code or mathematics ourselves.
On 2009 Nov 21 (Sat) at 17:42:48 -0500 (-0500), Samuel Baldwin wrote:
:2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
: Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
:
:That's the nice thing about open source software; we don't have to,
:because we can verify their code or mathematics ourselves.
I am now adding to the noise.
c'mon folks, stop this. there are ways to insert holes into any O/S
that allows loading of firmware blobs. how many end users have torn
one apart to see what it really does?
IO processors have access to your data at a very intimate level,
think about it
then
google we are talking to you!
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
I am now adding to the noise.
c'mon folks, stop this. there are ways to insert holes into any O/S
that allows loading of firmware blobs. how many end users have torn
one apart to see what it really
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:07:31 -0600
From: j...@fixedpointgroup.com
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Security via the NSA?
can [sic] we stop these dumb posts about the NSA and windows [sic] 7?
Only if you stop these dumb posts asking others to stop their dumb posts.
Sincerely,
IRT
That just means NoSuchUser is well hidden!! :)
On 11/21/09, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com [2009-11-21 23:41]:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
right, of course the NSA gets commit access and peer review rules
don't apply.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:51 AM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
That just means NoSuchUser is well hidden!! :)
rather, henning must be running badfinger.
-pk
On 11/21/09, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com [2009-11-21 23:41]:
Depends on
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
NSA also helped Linux with SElinux. As long as OpenBSD remains open source,
I don't see the problem.
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
NSA also helped Linux with SElinux. As long as OpenBSD remains open
2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
That's the nice thing about open source software; we don't have to,
because we can verify their code or mathematics ourselves.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:32 PM, AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com wrote:
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
* AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com [2009-11-21 23:41]:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
right, of course the NSA gets commit access and peer review rules
don't apply. right.
henn...@cvs:2$ finger nsa
finger: nsa: no such user.
hmm.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:32 PM, AG computing.acco...@googlemail.comwrote:
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
Doug Milam wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
Only if they Paypal some $$$ to http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html :)
On 11/21/2009 6:01 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
henn...@cvs:2$ finger nsa
finger: nsa: no such user.
hmm.
Perhaps they use a less obvious user name, like 'henning'...
Doug Milam wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
can we stop these dumb posts about the NSA and windows 7? it's really
not related to openbsd.
spend less time being preoccupied with the fact that
25 matches
Mail list logo
