2010/5/18 Eric S. Pulley pul...@dabus.com:
Is there some way to authenticate and verify source updating traffic?
So you are seriously suggesting the OpenBSD folks set up a public-key
cryptography system (SSL) to confirm their current public-key cryptography
system (SSH)? I guess then we
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 15:52, Martin SchrC6der mar...@oneiros.de wrote:
Qiu: AFAIK no.
Well, I see. Thank you!
And thanks for all that answered. Have a nice day! :-)
--
h#d=: (QIU Quan) jac...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:07:59PM -0600, Eric S. Pulley wrote:
So you are seriously suggesting the OpenBSD folks set up a public-key
cryptography system (SSL) to confirm their current public-key cryptography
system (SSH)? I guess then we would need a third system to confirm the
first two,
On Wed, 19 May 2010 16:18:53 +0800 QIU Quan jac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 15:52, Martin SchrC6der mar...@oneiros.de
wrote:
Qiu: AFAIK no.
Well, I see. Thank you!
And thanks for all that answered. Have a nice day! :-)
First of all you need to realize SSL is not as cool
Having read the FAQ, I learned there are 3 ways to sync sources. Among
them, only AnonCVS can be transmitted in a secure channel when using
SSH transport. The other two, namely CVSup and CVSync, are transferred
in clear text with no server identity authentication. However, even
the AnonCVS host
Having read the FAQ, I learned there are 3 ways to sync sources. Among
them, only AnonCVS can be transmitted in a secure channel when using SSH
transport. The other two, namely CVSup and CVSync, are transferred in
clear text with no server identity authentication. However, even the
AnonCVS host
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 16:07, Eric S. Pulley pul...@dabus.com wrote:
Having read the FAQ, I learned there are 3 ways to sync sources. Among
them, only AnonCVS can be transmitted in a secure channel when using SSH
transport. The other two, namely CVSup and CVSync, are transferred in
clear text
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:16, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe he's in China and wants to encrypt his traffic to keep the man
off his back???
*checks OP e-mail address*
nope, he has access to gmail.com... B not in China...
Yes. I'm in China. Accessing Gmail through HTTPS web interface.
Sorry. Forgot to CC the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: QIU Quan jac...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:05
Subject: Re: Some secure way of updating sources?
To: Eric S. Pulley pul...@dabus.com
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:07, Eric S. Pulley pul...@dabus.com wrote:
So
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:14 PM, QIU Quan jac...@gmail.com wrote:
SSL has some authorities which other current PKI systems, e.g. SSH,
PGP, lacks. Usually, the trusted authorities are delivered along with
OS distributions. Although a vendor should take the responsibility to
validate the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:29, Nick Bender nben...@gmail.com wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2010/03/govts-certificate-authorities-co
nspire-to-spy-on-ssl-users.ars
How could a citizen evade targeted surveillance by government
agencies? Anyone see it even possible? That should not be
11 matches
Mail list logo
