13.01.2012 17:22, Stuart Henderson P?P8QP5Q:
On 2012/01/13 16:55, lilit-aibolit wrote:
13.01.2012 16:11, Stuart Henderson P?P8QP5Q:
a: 1.0G 63 4.2BSD 2048 163841 # /
b: 1.2G 2097215swap
c:37.3G
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:20:07PM +0200, Vitali wrote:
There is one more philosophical side effect of this question - speed.
The closer the partition is placed to the outer cylinders, the faster
the data are read from it.
More a methaphysical question. On modern disks, the
Hi misc. Here is newbee question.
I have disk with unused space:
# disklabel -p g wd0
16 partitions:
#size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 1.0G 63 4.2BSD 2048 163841 # /
b: 1.2G 2097215swap
c:
Hi,
On Friday, 13 Jan 2012 at 13:40 CET
lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi misc. Here is newbee question.
I have disk with unused space:
# disklabel -p g wd0
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 1.0G63 4.2BSD 2048
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi misc. Here is newbee question.
I have disk with unused space:
# disklabel -p g wd0
B k: B B B B B B 18.1G B B B B 40266255 B 4.2BSD B 2048 16384 B
B 1 # /home
[some text is cut]
In /var I store some
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:12:46 +0200
Vitali coonar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, lilit-aibolit
lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi misc. Here is newbee question.
I have disk with unused space:
# disklabel -p g wd0
B k: B B B B B B 18.1G B B B B 40266255 B
solution or choose a new partition map you will use on next update of the
machine.
From: lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru
Sent: Fri Jan 13 12:40:37 CET 2012
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: disk management
Hi misc. Here is newbee question.
I have
Hi
If I added it up correctly, you don't have any unused space on your disk.
As stated on the FAQ (4.6.4)
c on all disks is the whole disk partition, it is used by programs
that
have to have raw access to the physical disk, such as fdisk(8) and
disklabel(8).
So, although disklabel says
On Friday, January 13, 2012, Zi Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
Hi
If I added it up correctly, you don't have any unused space on your disk.
As stated on the FAQ (4.6.4)
c on all disks is the whole disk partition, it is used by
programs that
have to have raw access to the physical disk,
fpussa...@contactoffice.fr (Francois Pussault), 2012.01.13 (Fri) 13:28 (CET):
J /home all of the free space
may I just throw in: fsck duration upon boot after unclean unmount.
A good philosophy: as little as possible (fsck duration), as much as
necessary (user/service reqirement).
Needed:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Francois Pussault
fpussa...@contactoffice.fr wrote:
I prefer to define my parts manualy like this
A / 256Mo
enough free space on the fastest disk in the machine
[cut]
When your /var will be full, it will not grow up, you have to purge some
log
files (use
13.01.2012 14:28, Francois Pussault P?P8QP5Q:
With a so huge /var 90% is anormal, you should already look for a logrotate
solution or choose a new partition map you will use on next update of the
machine.
First of all, thanks all for your replies.
As I said /var is used for www-aplication
[cut]
2.2G B B total
do I understand correctly, that in my case the easiest way is
decrease /home and increase /var?
Taking into account that your /home is used only by 2% (the least used
of the largest by size) and your /var is used by 90% and you need more
there, - then yes. :)
--
###
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:20:20PM +0200, Vitali wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Francois Pussault
fpussa...@contactoffice.fr wrote:
I prefer to define my parts manualy like this
A / 256Mo
enough free space on the fastest disk in the machine
[cut]
When your /var will be
On 2012-01-13, lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote:
13.01.2012 14:28, Francois Pussault P?P8QP5Q:
With a so huge /var 90% is anormal, you should already look for a logrotate
solution or choose a new partition map you will use on next update of the
machine.
First of all, thanks all
There is one more philosophical side effect of this question - speed.
The closer the partition is placed to the outer cylinders, the faster
the data are read from it.
More a methaphysical question. On modern disks, the correspondence
between block/cyl number and physcial location is very
13.01.2012 16:11, Stuart Henderson P?P8QP5Q:
a: 1.0G 63 4.2BSD 2048 163841 # /
b: 1.2G 2097215swap
c:37.3G0 unused
d: 2.6G 4683375 4.2BSD 2048 163841 # /tmp
On 2012-01-13 15.55, lilit-aibolit wrote:
I got the same recommendation from Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com
with little difference, do it in single mode:
1. Boot in single user mode, enter shell.
2. mount /, /usr, /var and /home.
3. Move /var/* to /home.
4. Move /home/* to /var (except what
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:55:04 +0200
lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote:
13.01.2012 16:11, Stuart Henderson P?P8QP5Q:
a: 1.0G 63 4.2BSD 2048 163841
# / b: 1.2G 2097215swap
c:37.3G0 unused
On 2012/01/13 16:55, lilit-aibolit wrote:
13.01.2012 16:11, Stuart Henderson P?P8QP5Q:
a: 1.0G 63 4.2BSD 2048 163841 # /
b: 1.2G 2097215swap
c:37.3G0 unused
d: 2.6G
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:45:47PM +0200, lilit-aibolit wrote:
13.01.2012 14:28, Francois Pussault P?P8QP5Q:
With a so huge /var 90% is anormal, you should already look for a
logrotate
solution or choose a new partition map you will use on next update of the
machine.
That was your best
On 01/13/2012 09:55 AM, lilit-aibolit wrote:
13.01.2012 16:11, Stuart Henderson P?P8QP5Q:
a: 1.0G 63 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 # /
b: 1.2G 2097215 swap
c: 37.3G 0 unused
d: 2.6G 4683375 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 # /tmp
e: 4.0G 10052439 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 # /var
f: 2.0G 18541648 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 #
22 matches
Mail list logo
