I finally upgraded my last machine - that runs ldapd(8) for user
logins, mail aliases, and a few other odds and ends - from 5.4 to 5.5.
I'm left wondering if I'm the only one who actually uses the stock
ldapd(8), because it is not called out at all in upgrade55.html as
having problems with the
On 2014-07-22, Matthew Weigel uni...@idempot.net wrote:
I finally upgraded my last machine - that runs ldapd(8) for user
logins, mail aliases, and a few other odds and ends - from 5.4 to 5.5.
Haha! I just did the same two days ago.
I'm left wondering if I'm the only one who actually uses the
On 7/22/14, 9:03 PM, Olivier Mehani wrote:
I ended up having to create a 5.4 VM (I stuck with the same amd64 arch
as my actual server, and have not investigated or tested under what
constraints this might work across architectures) to load the ldapd(8)
database files, use third party LDAP tools
On 7/22/14, 9:37 PM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
into it, I started up ldapd(8) and connected to it with ldapvi(1) from
ports. I wrote out the contents of that buffer to a separate file, and
Actually I didn't notice it this weekend but ldapvi(1) has --in and
--out arguments that do exactly the
Hey Matthew,
On 2014-07-23, Matthew Weigel uni...@idempot.net wrote:
into it, I started up ldapd(8) and connected to it with ldapvi(1) from
ports. I wrote out the contents of that buffer to a separate file, and
Actually I didn't notice it this weekend but ldapvi(1) has --in and
--out
5 matches
Mail list logo
