On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:36 PM, T. Valent tmp...@4ss.de wrote:
Folks, yes, I appreciate your attempt to help a lot. And I really am on
your side if we're talking about normal machines.
However, obviously nobody believes me when I say For us there is no
reason to update to newer versions of
Folks, yes, I appreciate your attempt to help a lot. And I really am on
your side if we're talking about normal machines.
However, obviously nobody believes me when I say For us there is no
reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet. On the contrary,
maintenance is a lot easier for us if
T. Valent tmp-ml () 4ss ! de at 2010-03-21 10:36:59
wrote:
In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
customers, just because I
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0100, T. Valent wrote:
In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
customers, just because
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:46:05AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
T. Valent tmp-ml () 4ss ! de at 2010-03-21 10:36:59
wrote:
In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
new platform (new
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:36 +0100, T. Valent tmp...@4ss.de wrote:
In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
customers, just
T. Valent wrote:
Folks, yes, I appreciate your attempt to help a lot. And I really am on
your side if we're talking about normal machines.
However, obviously nobody believes me when I say For us there is no
reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet. On the contrary,
maintenance is a
Brad Tilley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:36 +0100, T. Valent tmp...@4ss.de wrote:
In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all
Nick Holland wrote:
With Windows, Solaris or Linux, you hunt down drivers when new
hardware comes out. OpenBSD makes you do some work, too -- upgrade to
a new release. My experience has been that upgrading is easier than
hunting down the new drivers.
I think that this fact is a pretty
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:34:14 -0400 Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
The great fantasy of many people in the IT world is lots of identical
hardware and software. Sorry, this is completely unrealistic, or at
least completely unhealthy, in the big picture.
Until they understand
Hi!
We're using OpenBSD 4.3 kernels on a larger number of machines.
(For us there is no reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet.
On the contrary, maintenance is a lot easier for us if we try to keep
all systems on the same versions for as long as possible.)
Yet we have been using
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, T. Valent tmp...@4ss.de wrote:
(For us there is no reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet.
Quoting Section 5.1 of the FAQ:
...old releases are typically supported up to two releases back. It takes
resources and time to support older versions, while
OpenBSD 4.3 is no longer officially supported.
That wasn't my question. I didn't ask for support, I thought maybe
someone has an idea which recent boards could be compatible to 4.3.
It's a valid question, isn't it? ;-)
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:22:39PM +0100, T. Valent wrote:
OpenBSD 4.3 is no longer officially supported.
That wasn't my question. I didn't ask for support, I thought maybe
someone has an idea which recent boards could be compatible to 4.3.
It's a valid question, isn't it? ;-)
No, not
OpenBSD 4.3 is no longer officially supported.
That wasn't my question. I didn't ask for support, I thought maybe
someone has an idea which recent boards could be compatible to 4.3.
It's a valid question, isn't it? ;-)
Sure, it's a valid question.
And the answer is that we wouldn't
[old versions on new hardware]
And the answer is that we wouldn't know, since we don't run old code.
I didn't expect that anyone of the OpenBSD core-team would have an
answer due to the obvious fact that you must be working with the latest
versions.
But who knows, maybe I'm lucky and there's
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:11:59PM +0100, T. Valent wrote:
[old versions on new hardware]
And the answer is that we wouldn't know, since we don't run old code.
I didn't expect that anyone of the OpenBSD core-team would have an
answer due to the obvious fact that you must be working with
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:22:39PM +0100, T. Valent wrote:
OpenBSD 4.3 is no longer officially supported.
That wasn't my question. I didn't ask for support, I thought maybe
someone has an idea which recent boards could be compatible to 4.3.
It's a valid question, isn't it? ;-)
Friends
On Saturday 20 March 2010 15:02:40 T. Valent wrote:
Hi!
We're using OpenBSD 4.3 kernels on a larger number of machines.
(For us there is no reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet.
On the contrary, maintenance is a lot easier for us if we try to keep
all systems on the same
19 matches
Mail list logo
