On 2011 Jun 23 (Thu) at 00:32:40 +0200 (+0200), ter Voorde Informatiesystemen
wrote:
:You are completely right.
:
:I was only wondering if I do not set the variable explicitly, the
:default value would be 0 or 1.
:
:Kind regards,
:
:Frank
:
For some sysctls, the default is 0, for others, the
That would make things simpler.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:09:16 +0100, Paul Suh wrote:
Folks,
I could add another physical interface for the internal end of the bridge,
but not for the external end. Would this work?
--Paul
On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Lets get some standard stuff out of the way first.
# uname -a
OpenBSD pbxfw 4.9 GENERIC#671 i386
# dmesg
OpenBSD 4.9 (GENERIC) #671: Wed Mar 2 07:09:00 MST 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 3 GHz
2011/6/21 Daniel Dickman didick...@gmail.com
Do you only have the jre installed? Does it work if you install the jdk as
well?
I've installed a jdk but still could not use the HSQL DATABASE.
$ pkg_info | grep jdk
jdk-1.7.0.00beta122p0v0 Java2(TM) SE Dev Kit v1.7.0.00 Early Access b122
$
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:32:40AM +0200, ter Voorde Informatiesystemen wrote:
You are completely right.
I was only wondering if I do not set the variable explicitly, the
default value would be 0 or 1.
Ok, that I can not find from the documentation,
only that setting it to 0 most probably
On 2011-06-23, Magnus Rixtorp mag...@tokra.org wrote:
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.0.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.230.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.231.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out quick log on
hostname.if(5) shows the format you need to use for setting aliases.
You should only set vhid/advbase/etc once for the interface.
On 2011-06-23, Stefan N stefanbsd...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am in the midst of configuring the OpenBSD 4.9 PF using ip balancing and
active-passive
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:27:09 +0200
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Ok, that I can not find from the documentation,
only that setting it to 0 most probably is a change.
I believe the defaults are conveniently listed in the comments next to
the settings in sysctl.conf. I don't see why they'd change
On 2011-06-23, Raimo Niskanen raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:32:40AM +0200, ter Voorde Informatiesystemen wrote:
You are completely right.
I was only wondering if I do not set the variable explicitly, the
default value would be 0 or 1.
Ok, that I can not
On 2011-06-23 11:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-06-23, Magnus Rixtorpmag...@tokra.org wrote:
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.0.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.230.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from
Yol Dostlar} ile vizesiz Yunan Adalar} Gezisi (12-18 Temmuz)
Bir kez daha merhaba arkada~lar...
Yol Dostlar} olarak bu kez muhte~em bir gemiyle Yunan Adalar}na gitmeye karar
verdik. Ve bu geziyi bu turlar} 45 y}ld}r yapan dev bir firmayla yap}yoruz...
TURA Turizmin katk}s}yla Vizesiz Yunan
THIS MESSAGE IS FROM OUR TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM This message is sent
automatically by the computer. If you are receiving this message it means
that your email address has been queued for deactivation; this was as a
result of a continuous error script (code:505)receiving from this email
address.
Hello,
I would like to know who is going to the LSM (Libre
Software Meeting) of 2011 also called RMLL (Rencontres
Mondiales du Logiciel Libre) that will be in Strasbourg
this year from 9th to 14th of July.
Program shows there will be an OpenBSD booth there.
--
Khan!
Dear misc users,
I'm currenlty installing openBSD on a ALix board, the network card are
RhineIII
I may have detect a 'bug':
- the network paquet are send only when vr1 is plugged, not vr0.
as soon as you plug / unplug vr1 the network start / stop on both interface.
Is ukphy experimental ??
Or
On 2011/06/23 17:12, sven falempin wrote:
\xc2\xa0
Dear misc users,
\xc2\xa0
I'm\xc2\xa0currenlty installing openBSD on a ALix board, the network
card are
RhineIII
I may have detect a 'bug':
\xc2\xa0- the network paquet are send only when vr1 is plugged, not
vr0.
as soon as you plug /
On 2011/06/23 18:11, sven falempin wrote:
My scenario to ensure the problem is the following:
I\xc2\xa0plug both interface on same hub, and a third party box.
Two interfaces dhcp'ing on the same hub - so you have
two interfaces in the same subnet - this is a misconfiguration
Yes,
and it works !
Something else happend during the boot process (with only 1 nic plugged) and
i'm still looking for the problem.
i contact you again if i m sure there is a problem,
Sorry for inconvenience.
2011/6/23 Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org
On 2011/06/23 18:11, sven falempin wrote:
On 2011-06-23 14:09, Magnus Rixtorp wrote:
On 2011-06-23 11:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-06-23, Magnus Rixtorpmag...@tokra.org wrote:
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.0.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out quick log on $ext_if inet from 192.168.230.0/24 nat-to $ext_if
pass out
Sure. Not to mention it came with source code, which you only got from
ATT if you had a source license, and those were*expensive*. I was
fortunate enough to work for a company that had exactly that source
license during the 1980:s, and I learned a*lot* just by reading the
code. Wish I still
Tobias Ulmer [tobi...@tmux.org] wrote:
Here is something to read: http://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/
I never knew cat -v was an option. Amazing! That was one of the most useful
features in cat and I've never even seen it before! Now if only I could find
something to use with tn3270
--
the
Dajka Tamas [dajka.ta...@upc.hu] wrote:
Assigning one of the phys devices as vlandev to a vlan is not working. I
mean, I can assign to them, but if vlan40 is assigned to hme2 and hme2
failes, than vlan40 will be down and hosts in vlan40 are unreacheable.
So:
ifconfig hme2 up
ifconfig
Dear [misc] mailing list(eners),
My amd64 system [4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #335] contains three sd? drives:
sd0: MO drive
sd1: boot disk
sd2: additional disk
In contrast to 4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #335 or 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #819 kernels
the snapshot 4.9-current (GENERIC) #47 kernel does not recognize sd1 as
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Jens A. Griepentrog
griep...@wias-berlin.de wrote:
In contrast to 4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #335 or 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #819 kernels
the snapshot 4.9-current (GENERIC) #47 kernel does not recognize sd1 as
boot disk even when the MO drive sd0 is empty. The system ends up in
OpenBSD specifically and old BSD in general is not true to Unix. From
ksh to billions of options to find and other tools to the entire
networking framework (bolted on with additional syscalls, pseudo devices
etc), nothing of that is Unix (or even -like).
Here is something to read:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
Does it work if you try booting with boot bsd -a and manually tell
it to use sd1a as the root device?
And if so, please include the output of running disklabel on each of your disks.
Also, what version of boot(8) do
PET
24.06
Grupnipopust Srbija
===
POTREBNO JE 5 KUPONA ZA PROLAZ
UD
itajte sliku za ispravan pregled
[IMAGE]
50% popusta na kompletan servis klima ureDaja i dopunu freona u
Beocentru
za samo 1800 dinara umesto
What do you call an OpenBSD network admin? The answer is at the end of this
message.
What kind of server load will 62 sshfs connections have on an Atom server
with 4GB RAM? The connections will last a workday. I am assuming that a
sshfs connection is basically a ssh connection and hence the post
On 24 June 2011 04:57, Brett brett.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. Not to mention it came with source code, which you only got from
ATT if you had a source license, and those were*expensive*. I was
fortunate enough to work for a company that had exactly that source
license during the 1980:s, and
[+misc@, for users not subscribed to tech@]
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active development.
Hi Scott,
Scott Stanley wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:20:05PM -0700:
Somebody wrote:
OpenBSD specifically and old BSD in general is not true to Unix. From
ksh to billions of options to find and other tools to the entire
networking framework (bolted on with additional syscalls, pseudo
On 2011-06-23 23:18, mehma sarja wrote:
What do you call an OpenBSD network admin? The answer is at the end of this
message.
What kind of server load will 62 sshfs connections have on an Atom server
with 4GB RAM? The connections will last a workday. I am assuming that a
sshfs connection is
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:17:05 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Sure, it would be nice to rip that unsigned abomination out of C.
But who is goint to rewrite the world afterwards?
Ahhh, there's the pity that BK (IIRC) used a signed variable for clock
ticks. We would have had a 2K106 bug rather than a
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Brett brett.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. Not to mention it came with source code, which you only got from
ATT if you had a source license, and those were*expensive*. I was
fortunate enough to work for a company that had exactly that source
license during the
33 matches
Mail list logo
