Hi,
I have a HP DL145-G2. The SCSI card that comes with is supposed to be
supported by the mpt driver - the LSI Logic 53c1030 Fusion. It's not.
I also bought a MegaRAID 320-2X which I thought was supposed to be supported
by the ami driver, it's not. The MegaRaid has the latest bios, H429 build
On 8/8/05, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The BIOS on your box is lying. Update it to something newer and it might
magically work.
Oh gods. I just went to HP's site, and saw that there's bios updates
available. This is a HP DL145-G2, which has 2 hard drives, and no floppy.
Even the
Ooops, sorry, replied directly.
-Tai
-- Forwarded message --
From: bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Aug 9, 2005 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: LSI Logic 53C1030 on DL145-G2 not working
To: Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/8/05, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try -current
On 8/9/05, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they all work, they do not work in that specific machien because we
don't see the PCI bus they';re in for some reason - as other people
told you before
Didn't see that part. Thanx for clarifying. This sucks (for me), as HP's our
On 7/9/07, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have yet to find aftermarket sliding rails that don't suck. Either
I've been impressed by HP's sliding rails. Haven't really seen other
rails but damn, Sun doesn't even do sliding rails for the v100s or
whatever it was I bought last year.
On 11 Jul 2007 10:59:12 +0200, Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linus contradicts Theo on Intel TLB issue:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559
Count the number of bugs in the errata. Only a very few of them deal with
the TLB and most of those
On 7/11/07, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Artur Grabowski wrote:
The TLB issues are just one small part of what Theo was talking about,
not even the most important one.
Count the number of bugs in the errata. Only a very few of them deal with
the TLB and most of those are easy
On 12 Jul 2007 09:56:03 +0200, Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that's what he said. He wasn't contradicting me, he was just
amplifying my message. :)
In that case, color me *blush* :) Apologies Jacob.
-Tai
--
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle
On 7/16/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HP-145 M1 and IBM e326, witch both works well, with the IBM giving
me some minor issues every few months, but looks like it cleared up over
time with various upgrades.
I'm not sure if I would recommend the DL-145s. I bought about 2 dozen
Because you're thinking like an experienced system administrator, not
some phb or fresh graduate pretending to be a Big4 auditor.
On 7/17/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 07:08:21PM +0300, Richard Storm wrote:
This is crappy howto. *encryption* there are
Well, there's the obvious solution, right? OUTSOURCE IT!!! Just
stick the sweaty person on the outside!
On 7/20/07, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Olsson wrote:
-Apart from health this could be used to generate electricity for Theo's
servers!
You're not looking at the big
On 8/1/07, Floor Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you asking why someone who spends so much time helping others
(probably you too, you use OpenBSD right?) does not get a real job?!
Really, the question comes down to: Should a core openbsd hacker have
to pay for the machine they do openbsd
On 8/5/07, Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
What a crappy article. Whoever gives a sh*t about what that guy
wrote, I don't know.
Well, there's also the fact that Theo lost part of the $2mil grant
from Darpa because of his outspoken opinions. If US$2mil wasn't
enough to buy
On 9/3/07, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NameFlags Part Type FS Type [Label]Size
(MB)
--
sda1Primary Unknown (27) 10479.01
sda2
On 9/13/07, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the printed, comb-binded, March 1987 Sixth Edition, version 18 of
the GNU Emacs Manual. It includes the 1985/1986 version of the GNU
Manifesto which says on page 244:
If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
On 9/13/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't. The OpenBSD installer is a very underrated part of the
overall user experience. What other OS can you install in 3 minutes
flat? Keep it simple, stupid.
Oh noes, you don't understand. See, I have a shaggy dog tale that
demonstrates
On 9/14/07, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To stay informed of new features, please supply your support contract
number on the page http://www.openbsd.org/update-me-when-stuff-is-done/
Unfortunately, 404 compliant.
--
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
On 9/15/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GNU Manifesto by Richard Stallman can be found here:
http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/GNU/info/GNUGNU
If Stallman actually believed a word of what he wrote above, he would
still be dedicating all of his works to the public domain since it
would
On 9/15/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has everything to do with Stallman's FSF/SFLC lawyer cronies.
They're the ones giving faulty counsel to Linux developers.
I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this. People who
have spoken with him indicated to me that he is
I don't thinl this helps openbsd or anyone else. As Theo is already
working with the individuals involved, and hasn't asked for help, I
think rather than saying I think you're going to suck, let's see
what happens. Going ovewrboard isn't going to help anyone.
On 9/16/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL
On 9/20/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:09 PM, Josh wrote:
Can someone please inform me if this is a really bad idea or not,
ideally with some nice reasoning?
What type of throughput is required between each segment? If you've
been around here much, you've
That's why god created competant network admins and NAT.
On 9/21/07, Luca Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 10:52 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I don't understand the logic of having multiple firewalls on one box.
If one box can handle the throughput requirements of
Isn't one of the core2 bugs that nx is only honored for one of the
cores but not the other?
On 9/20/07, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to:
Sorry, iirc it was in that link that Theo posted on core 2 errata.
Hopefully I didn't read it incorrectly. But I disclaim everything...
On 9/21/07, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't one of the core2 bugs that nx is only honored for one
Is there even anything that's a full sexchange replacement? I'm aware
of a group that runs around replacing large sexchange installations
with linux running on BigIron, so there may be feasible replacements.
Is your issue sexchange or LookOut?
On 10/2/07, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On 10/23/07, Ben Goren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that's about it. I suppose running Windows virtual machines on
a real OpenBSD machine might ``have a lot of security benefits''
in some perverted sense of the words, but it's not like the VM is
magically going to protect the virtual
On 10/24/07, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All things being equal, the safest base installations in the universe
would be those whose user instances were encased in some kind of
solid VM and whose base instance administrators were provided
with and followed best practices.
My VM:
On 10/24/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
without bad config errors (that are getting harder to make, except on
cisco, they got the semantics completely wrong and stupid defaults) and
usedcorrectly, yes, VLANs perfectly isolate network segments.
I'm curious about this. Do you have
On 10/24/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, it's YOU that missed the point! I never said or made any comparison
to physical machines - the entirety of that I said is:
Running services/application domains in VMs increases security. As I
said in a previous email, only an idiot
On 10/25/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if I take your point or 'applications domain' and and translate this
in more practical term and stop using words out of the far fetch paper
and use more pragmatic day to day example. You argue that in this case,
if a setup is using VM
I'm really curious, I've never heard of a HD firmware killing bug in
linux since 1.3.x. I used to spend a lot of time following linux in
the 1.2 1.3 kernel times and don't recall hearing about that bug.
Thanx.
On 10/27/07, Tonnerre LOMBARD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Salut,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007
On 10/28/07, Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 20:27 -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
The fact that Microshaft crap has hundreds or thousands of
vulnerabilities
is the other extreme of the list.
I have gone as far as to say Windows is insecure by default which is
Hi,
Just bought a WDC 250G HD. Model WD2500JB-00G.
I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable.
fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a newfs
/dev/wd3a, the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it) and
mounts without problems.
On 6/26/05, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
you changed a default and found a bug. less than 1% of users ever use
-m.
there's really no good reason to use -m 1, and several reasons not to
(not
least of which is it apparently doesn't work).
On 7/20/05, Ryan Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a problem adding a SATA drive to my current obsd configuration.
I
have two IDE drives in the box. A 12gig and a 40gig. I have the /, /usr,
/var, /tmp and swap on the 12gig and /home on the 40 gig. I just purchased
a
SATA drive with a
Hi,
I've been following the discussion about opteron servers, and when I am
finally allowed to go get a few servers, I find that HP and IBM have both
changed their servers. IBM's eserver 325 is now 326, and HP's DL145 G1 is
now the G2.
Have anyone bought any servers from a Tier-1 (ibm, hp,
On 7/28/05, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have anyone bought any servers from a Tier-1 (ibm, hp, dell[1]) recently
that is opteron based, that works fine with openbsd?
The IBM's I bought are all 325's, I will have a 326 shortly.
Can't find any, their website states that 325's are not
On 8/2/05, Andy Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus said Barry, Christopher on Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:43:56 EDT:
Authpf seems to do this via ssh, but I'll need to service non-ssh
equipped sales folk, etc. Is there a project around that provides this
functionality, or will I need to create
On 11/8/05, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, this is a good start. One more piece of advice, try not to
make the document too narrative, but rather just put in what the user
needs to know to get a desktop working.
One piece of advice, take a look at gentoo's install docs. Just
On 11/13/05, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an attack against TCP, not SSH. TCP is not encrypted (usually -
IPSec or somesuch, with the proper settings, could make this impossible)
- all that's required is some sequence numbers.
And yes, a really good switch configured by
On 11/25/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are partially correct about the MegaRAID ATA 133-2 HBA; the
MegaRAID ATA 133-2 is _partially_ supported in OpenBSD mainly because
it is only _partially_ a RAID device. The low-end ATA-133-2 card is
actually a fake-RAID device that
On 11/26/05, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't presume to speak for Mr. Holland, of course. But I've raised
the pdf issue here a couple of times lately. I *don't* hate pdf. What I
object to is inapproriate use. Why the hell would you type out a text
document and then make it
On 11/28/05, Paul Pruett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
omg what a load of ,
to funny, any coporation stupid enough to fall for that story
by ssh to buy Tectia ssh and not use openssh deserves to be
taken for plus the security issues they will get.
That's because there's a huge number
Hi,
Hi,
I have one megaraid i4, but with two channels set up. One raid1 for the OS,
and one raid5 with 4x250G hard drives. Currently, my 3 options are:
1) use the older motherboard, P3-450Mhz with 3.8-release which supports
both channels.
2) use the newer motherboard, P3-1.4Ghz, with 3.8-stable
On 12/27/05, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strip a single RAID 5 set across channels to speed up the SCSI
backend. Then slice it up using disklabel. That should do the trick.
My problem is that the 2 OS drives are 160GB, whereas my attempt at a poor
man's raid5 are 4x250GB.
One
On 3/22/07, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Golden Age of cheap servers (and laptops and ...) is almost
upon us, just as soon as the lemmings start going to Vista.
Oh crap, I *will* use this in my sig file. 8-)
On 3/25/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works fine if you're using secure VLANs. But if you have the
money for a VLAN-capable switch, you might as well use dedicated
interfaces. But it *can* be done easily and securely.
But isn't the hope then that there's no leakage and that you
On 3/25/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disabling DTP, which should be done anyways, will prevent VLAN
hopping. I'm not sure what arp-based thing you're referring to
that wasn't fixed 5-6 years ago. Perhaps you're referring to arp
spoofing, which has nothing to do with VLANs. Please
On 3/25/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. We really need more *BSD attendees at Shmoocon. If you're
remotely interested in security, and I would assume most folks
using OpenBSD are, you should really come out next year. Besides
myself and Mike Erdely, I ran into Ray Lai
Just looking for a recommendation on a good/cheap (but not necessarily
fast) microatx motherboard. Or possibly, one of those via
motherboards, but needs to fit in an atx case.
Thanx in advance.
On 3/26/07, Todd Alan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138027
I've been quite happy with the machines thus far.
However, beware that the chipsets are all NVIDIA.
Thanx!
On 4/6/07, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you people seem to miss in the whole discussion here is that Linux
people contact vendors IN PRIVATE if they find GPL violations yet a
valuable member of the open source community does not get the same
courtesy. Only bad things happen
On 4/6/07, Marcus Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a shame the gnu folks didn't release their reversed engineered
specifications separately.
Waitaminit - I thought they did?!?! Reading that gmane list, one of
the spec writing people said he would be happy to answer any questions
about the
One thing you may want to consider - booting off /dev/sd0a, and mounting the
rest as raid, and mirroring /dev/sd0a to /dev/sd1a so that you can swap a
cable and be on the alternate /dev/sd0a. This should not be a big deal,
since the root partition should not change that much, and a nightly rsync
Out of curiousity, why do a routerboard, when you can use something like the
following:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813185094
On 4/11/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the same filename, sometimes you have to specify a different filename
to
scp, depending on whether the file is on remote system or local one.
I have created a remote file whose filename a b is 3 chars long - ASCII
codes
97, 32, 98
- Original message -
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
I thought we shouldn't support ath?
On 4/11/07, pedro la peu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The usual recommendation is ral(4)
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
On 4/13/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(On another note, ftps - ftp over SSL - does have an ASCII mode. It's
also incompatible with pretty much anything and best replaced by
something vaguely modern - say, sftp.)
What's the problem with ftp/ssl? Beyond the fact that it uses
On 4/15/07, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, find an old ups with a serial port, make sure it's on the nut
list, then buy replacement batteries at batteriesplus for ~$25 each.
Oops, sent to Chris when I mean to send to misc :)
On 4/16/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trouble is, when you have a strange mystery bug floating out
there, it may or may not be correctly blamed for any and all problems.
So, that's the cause of global warming... :)
On 4/24/07, Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ``it'' that doesn't have support for DRM isn't just the GENERIC
configuration---it's the OpenBSD kernel sources. There's as much
source code supporting DRM in the kernel as there is supporting
Reiser4 or ZFS.
Taking it completely out
I have a question. Some 64 bit cards (PCI-X?) seem to work in 32 bit
slots (PCI 2.2?). Is this a feature, or am I looking at possible
issues down the road? Specifically, I am trying to build a n old(er)
box, and on a whim (and vague memories about this working), stuck an
em card into it. Box
On 5/15/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-15 00:03]:
* bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-14 21:54]:
I have a question. Some 64 bit cards (PCI-X?) seem to work in 32 bit
slots (PCI 2.2?). Is this a feature, or am I looking at possible
And if he encrypts using the http server's ssl cert, he doesn't even
have to worry about decryption issues - the https server can dwcrypt
and toss it to the downloading user.
Security? What's that? His looks more like a business/audit issue.
Am I jaded that I can now see giving the users what
On 6/8/07, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm going to be different and say 3 months, but probably much less than that.
Not to be an expert, or even a competent sysadmin, in my case. It was
1992, and I was working the VMS hell desk for the school as a student
worker. Heard about this
their emails, business cards, walls, where ever.
My business cards typically have my name, and the letters bofh after
it[1]. Well, that got stopped at the last place, but I'm going to put
it in again at the new place :) Depending on certification, and what
you do, sometimes having those letters does help
On 6/11/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed. The problem isn't with certification in itself but the way it
currently works in the IT industry. The majority of the people with
certification got it by going to a boot camp or buying one of them
examcram books thus end up with a
On 6/11/07, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alot of anti-cert sentiment. borderline misinformation in
some cases. I've interviewed folks with and without certs.
I don't know why some people insist on arguing
that book != cover[1] with regard to certs. silly.
here's a couple points for
On 6/12/07, Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is generally for http layer requests but I don't think apache
re-directs will suffice.
You may want to look at pound. A lot of people seem to like it.
--
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
-- Sandhurst
On 6/13/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very fast single-CPU machines here in Hamburg, asap, since I have some
time for such development right now. If you can help, please drop deraadt@
and me an email.
Got me a t-shirt, a 4.1 CD set, and $100 to you.
--
This officer's men seem to
Don't forget to mess with your bios settings. If you set up your bios
correctly, you don't have to fsck with anything. Remember, boys and
girls, this is why the PC is such an advanced piece of 21st century
technology.
--
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
--
That's ok, you can use my wep enabled wireless keyboard!!
On 6/20/07, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bob Beck wrote:
And guess what. Keyboards use a serial protocol. Which means that
there will be slightly different voltage drops in the system varying
with the keys you press.
On 6/27/07, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo says that AMD is getting less helpful towards open source OS.
Well, that's great. We only have 2 big proc developers for i386, and
now those two are turning out crap products with diminishing
documentation =(
I wonder where this road
Work is in the process of upgrading a dual 45Mb line. We stuck a
laptop on it, and was pulling 20 to 30 MB/s. A knoppix cd came down
in less than 30 seconds.
A former work place put in a 1 Gb/s line for one segment of their
network. Would have been sweet testing that line.
On 1/13/08, Dusty
for you. And send it to you
for free!
The Grand bofh
Church Of Security (.com)
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity. --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment
On Jan 18, 2008 4:28 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/08, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I understand, if foo isn't the last hard link to the file,
and `rm foo` will NOT delete the file...
what does it matter if somebody keeps a link to it? if you have idiot
On Jan 19, 2008 1:27 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/08, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make
install,
you'll overwrite the vulnerable copy with the new one, and all the
hardlinks
won't matter, because they'd
On Jan 19, 2008 8:22 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copying to a file can be done in two distinct ways
with different results for any other hard links to same file.
cp overwrites the original inode
install unlinks the original inode (after?) writing a new inode
You probably get
So,
Look for tempest rated computers?
On 1/30/08, Daniel A. Ramaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:35, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
My wife is sensitive to what she describes as electromagnetic fields.
She gets headaches and other pains when exposed to equipment: the
On Jan 30, 2008 3:50 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AIUI, tempest shields from the transients from keyboards. I don't know
that it shields from all EMF above (arbitrarily) 100 MHz. Besides, I'll
bet that to get the tempest certification would cost a whole lot more
than even a
On Jan 30, 2008 7:17 PM, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
Look for tempest rated computers?
These may be difficult to procure, because according to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPEST even the emission limits remain
classified, nevermind
On Jan 31, 2008 2:04 PM, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe it or not, there are only two obvious P-Pro machines on
ebay (us) right now. One is an overdrive (330MHz), the other a
diskless Dell Demention (sic ;-) at 180. They want 96$+ship
for that one. It must have considerable
On Jan 31, 2008 5:41 PM, Lord Sporkton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my question was not so much what can i do to mitigate the attack when
its happening, its more what can i do after someone attacks to stick
it to them
What would you like to do to them? It all depends on how good you are at
On Feb 2, 2008 9:36 PM, Jason Beaudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno what luck you've had, but I always ran into problems when
trying to transfer movies (and I think larger photos). but as you
pointed out.. cheap flash readers work to resolve this.
I've had problems with cheap flash
On Feb 6, 2008 3:09 AM, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please. There is enough bs here without intentionally piling it on.
Assuming a positive aspect to that, either you're confused about the
meaning of word 'based' or unfamiliar with AD.
AD is *not* Kerberos nor is it LDAP. AD may
On Feb 6, 2008 3:45 AM, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andre van Zyl wrote:
Please show me the proof that my customers are experiencing a net loss
of
productivity ...
You've provided that data point yourself: MS Windows.
That's just plain stupid, just like people who used to say
On Feb 6, 2008 7:42 AM, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Lymn wrote:
Oddly this non-standard AD seems to interoperate with the Solaris ldap
client, an openldap client and with MIT kerberos just fine.
Seems to, or actually does? Or can be be pounded in after agreeing to
On Feb 6, 2008 9:07 AM, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bofh wrote:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms818754.aspx
Read the page topic and search for the word PAC
Several links in it appears to confirm that a broken version of Kerberos
is still used:
The Kerberos
On Feb 6, 2008 9:28 PM, Sherwood Botsford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of my job description is to come as close as possible to
doing everything with no resources. (My entire IT budget for this
year is $6K. That includes internet connectivity, all repairs,
Are things really that tight?
On Feb 6, 2008 9:38 PM, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:28 PM, Sherwood Botsford wrote:
2. I figure there is less likely to be gotchas if all my core
switches are from the same vendor. What vendors do you recommend
for inexpensive switches.
Go used, but find
On Feb 6, 2008 10:45 AM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see external multi-disk IDE boxes. Besides, PATA is limited to
something like 18 from controller to drive. Even with a PCI
controller, there's not much distance. Also PATA cables aren't
shielded.
Why not just an
On Feb 6, 2008 11:38 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, for example, I have two boxes where I'm using IDE (the third box
is my Athlon with SATA drives). One won't boot (pass POST) if the drive
is over 1.1 GB, the other won't boot (pass POST) if the drive is over 9
GB.
I'm
On Feb 7, 2008 10:00 AM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh. I tossed a compaq scsi array too, last year, when I moved.
Yeah. I know that what I'm looking for, mostly, will be what people
think is worthless and fit for garbage. I'm trying to garbage pick
before that happens to
On Feb 8, 2008 7:58 AM, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
expected to emulate a Windows Server 200x domain controller.
But the interoperability issue goes far deeper than this.
In the domain control protocols that are used by MS Windows
XP Professional, there is
Dude,
I used to have a stack of proliants, and I agree with Nick. Prolaint
bios was... Special.
If you really want a low power cpu, get one of those c7 cpus, put it
in an aluminium case, and you don't have to worry about all those
issues that nick and others brought up. If you're worried about
If aesthetics is not important, a very good question to ask is - how good
are you with power tools? Else, heavy steel boxes are expensive to ship :)
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle
On Feb 9, 2008 4:12 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I just looked up the Cray1 on Wikipedia. It ran at 80 MHz!
Perfect. Just what I want in my basement. Anyone want to port OBSD?
In terms of pure computation, I believe a dual PPro200Mhz beats a Cray X/MP.
--
On Feb 12, 2008 9:47 PM, Darren Spiteri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 1:36 PM, David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's your definition of network performance?
What's your delineation between a firewall and a router?
I believe Ted's point is that receiving and sending
On Feb 12, 2008 11:21 PM, Darren Spiteri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now we're just getting into semantics. It is not uncommon for a
firewall to operate on layer 7, even with OpenBSD, considering that an
essential component of PF is ftp-proxy. What you call a firewall I
call a screen-router.
1 - 100 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
