Hi,
I have found a situation where --adjust-turn-headings creates a non
useful turn hint.
Compile the file:
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/207
with parameters --route and --adjust-turn-headings (maybe also
--x-no-mergeroads for easier debugging).
Try a route from Frankfurter Straße to
Hi WanMil,
I think the algo should not use/need the finalHeading value.
You may look at the algo in RoadNetwork.getAngle().
Gerd
WanMil wrote
Hi,
I have found a situation where --adjust-turn-headings creates a non
useful turn hint.
Compile the file:
Hi WanMil,
forget the 1dt sentence. I have no idea why the algo changes anything in
this situation.
Gerd
GerdP wrote
Hi WanMil,
I think the algo should not use/need the finalHeading value.
You may look at the algo in RoadNetwork.getAngle().
Gerd
WanMil wrote
Hi,
I have found a
Hi Gerd,
mmh, I don't understand what happens in the tweezeArcs method.
Can you explain in some sentences?
WanMil
Hi WanMil,
forget the 1dt sentence. I have no idea why the algo changes anything in
this situation.
Gerd
GerdP wrote
Hi WanMil,
I think the algo should not use/need the
Hi WanMil,
sorry, I read the comments multiple times, but I also don't know what it
does
in detail. It changes the initial heading value of an arc if some
criteria are met, this initial heading value is written to the img file
and Garmin uses it to calculate the angle between two arcs.
This angle
Hi Mark,
Some Garmin GPS units can tell you which lane to be in (lane
assist?) but we don't know how to encode that info. Pity, as that's just
what you need here.
I know this would be cool but I expect only something simple. attached is gpx
with 2 routes for a situation where
Hi Apollinaris,
found a problem in the osm data. there was a short bridge with the name of
the exit instead of the motorway name. the turn instruction was exactly as
expected according to your implementation.
OK.
I have another interesting one here
Hi Mark,
I think I have an example where this is useful. On a ~200km drive I got one
keep left announcement where there was only a normal exit from the motorway.
Before blindly adding this relation I want to understand how the current
algorithm should work. maybe I should fix the osm data first
Hi Apollinaris,
Hi Mark,
I think I have an example where this is useful. On a ~200km drive I got one
keep left announcement where there was only a normal exit from the motorway.
Before blindly adding this relation I want to understand how the current
algorithm should work. maybe I
Hi Mark,
found a problem in the osm data. there was a short bridge with the name of the
exit instead of the motorway name. the turn instruction was exactly as expected
according to your implementation.
I have another interesting one here
Hi Mark,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:40:10AM +, Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Toby,
Can we also try to infer through-routes from the presence of a 'route'
relation containing the ways?
Is that going to work? Just because a route uses a particular
combination of ways, it doesn't follow
Please look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.44827mlon=-3.49581zoom=16layers=B000FTF
If you approach the marked junction on the B4270 from the south,
intending to continue northwards on the B4268 then you get told turn
left as you approach the junction with 300m or so to go. Trouble
Hi Steve,
Please look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.44827mlon=-3.49581zoom=16layers=B000FTF
If you approach the marked junction on the B4270 from the south,
intending to continue northwards on the B4268 then you get told turn
left as you approach the junction with 300m or so
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Steve,
Please look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.44827mlon=-3.49581zoom=16layers=B000FTF
If you approach the marked junction on the B4270 from the south,
intending to continue northwards on the B4268 then you get told turn
left as you approach the
On a related note, I was driving a car today (untypical of me, since we
do not have one), and got a turning prompt where the twoway
highway=secondary became a dual carriageway, entering
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4492154
from the east. The transition is seamless on the road.
Marko Mäkelä wrote:
On a related note, I was driving a car today (untypical of me, since we
do not have one), and got a turning prompt where the twoway
highway=secondary became a dual carriageway, entering
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4492154
from the east. The transition is
Hi Steve,
Sounds great - I'll look forward to it.
Good, I will work on it this evening and I don't expect it to be a big
job.
We need to document the through_route relation on the wiki. I'm not
up to speed with wikis, can you (or anyone else) please write a few
words to describe what it is
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 04:37:58PM +, Steve Hosgood wrote:
Marko Mäkelä wrote:
On a related note, I was driving a car today (untypical of me, since we
do not have one), and got a turning prompt where the twoway
highway=secondary became a dual carriageway, entering
0 In article 20100205175428.33046...@crow,
0 Mark Burton URL:mailto:ma...@ordern.com (Mark) wrote:
Mark ... a junction when that cannot be reliably inferred from the ways'
Mark refs and/or names.
Can we also try to infer through-routes from the presence of a 'route'
relation containing the ways?
Hi Toby,
Can we also try to infer through-routes from the presence of a 'route'
relation containing the ways?
Is that going to work? Just because a route uses a particular
combination of ways, it doesn't follow that those ways are through
routes, does it?
Mark
20 matches
Mail list logo
