Re: Performance Update

2009-07-14 Thread Guillaume Laforge
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:19, Christian Thalingerchristian.thalin...@sun.com wrote: Jochen Theodorou wrote: show if it is worth the effort. Well.. cannot use invokedynamic on my machine yet... Why is that? Only x86 / 32bit if I recall correctly. Not yet working on AMD 64bit. -- Guillaume

Re: Performance Update

2009-07-14 Thread Christian Thalinger
Christian Thalinger wrote: Guillaume Laforge wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:19, Christian Thalingerchristian.thalin...@sun.com wrote: Jochen Theodorou wrote: show if it is worth the effort. Well.. cannot use invokedynamic on my machine yet... Why is that? Only x86 / 32bit if I recall

Re: Performance Update

2009-07-14 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Christian Thalinger schrieb: Christian Thalinger wrote: Guillaume Laforge wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:19, Christian Thalingerchristian.thalin...@sun.com wrote: Jochen Theodorou wrote: show if it is worth the effort. Well.. cannot use invokedynamic on my machine yet... Why is that?

Re: Performance Update

2009-07-14 Thread Christian Thalinger
Christian Thalinger wrote: Jochen Theodorou wrote: Christian Thalinger schrieb: Jochen Theodorou wrote: I managed to do the 64bit build, but I did not yet do the 32bit build, because not only do I need the jvm in 32bit, I also need all dependencies in 32bit. But if it is easy I would like

Re: Spread problem with 10 arguments

2009-07-14 Thread Fredrik Öhrström
Rémi Forax skrev: Your implementation doesn't follow the spec : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/pres/indy-javadoc-mlvm/java/dyn/MethodHandles.html#collectArguments(java.dyn.MethodHandle,%20java.dyn.MethodType) Only trailing arguments for a given position are collected :